Skip to comments.
Defense Dept: THE USA HAS *NOT* BOMBED KABUL AFGHANISTAN
FOX NEWS ^
Posted on 09/11/2001 3:33:08 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
Brit Hume just stated.
TOPICS: Announcements; Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
To: Recovering_Democrat
We are at such confusion.
Comment #3 Removed by Moderator
To: AMMON-CENTRIST
Of course we haven't bombed Kabul....................
4
posted on
09/11/2001 3:35:57 PM PDT
by
OldFriend
To: AMMON-CENTRIST
Of course we haven't bombed Kabul....................
5
posted on
09/11/2001 3:36:28 PM PDT
by
OldFriend
Comment #6 Removed by Moderator
To: OldFriend
I'm beginning to think we don't have any nuclear weapons. We don't have any. We just don't. If you have them and can't/won't use them then you don't have them... Oh well.
To: Recovering_Democrat
Maybe the Russians are attacking.
8
posted on
09/11/2001 3:38:49 PM PDT
by
Kerensky
To: Recovering_Democrat
WOlf Blitzer confirmed that a WHite House spokesman stated the US has nothing to do with what's going on in Kabul.
To: Hugh Akston
Maybe they're bombing themselves so the Islamic world will think it's us. I'm jesting of course, but not completely. Nothing is too loony for that crowd.
10
posted on
09/11/2001 3:40:07 PM PDT
by
lasereye
To: To All
Now is the time for ALL Americans to UNITE and stand behind President Bush!
Save the politics for another time!
To: Hugh Akston
didn't the taliban say it wasn't them as well...so why would we do such a thing.
12
posted on
09/11/2001 3:40:25 PM PDT
by
CJ Wolf
To: Recovering_Democrat
It could easily be that Northern Alliance.
To: Kerensky
I think you're right! I think the Russians are taking this opportunity to get a little revenge on the Taliban, who, after all, are mostly the same ones who humiliated them in the 80s. Whatever - happy shootin', Russia!
14
posted on
09/11/2001 3:42:45 PM PDT
by
agrandis
To: Recovering_Democrat
I posted this on another thread that got pulled.
Guy on CNN now (Cohen) is saying that this could just be part of the civil war that's been going on over there.
Possible.
The current news is that the last main opposition to the Taliban was killed yesterday.
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Intelligence reports show the guerrilla commander who led the fight against Afghanistan (news - web sites)'s ruling Taliban, Ahmad Shah Masood, died in a weekend explosion, U.S. officials said on Monday, amid conflicting comments about the opposition leader's fate.
``We believe he's dead,'' a U.S. official told Reuters on condition of anonymity. ``Intelligence reports from the region and elsewhere say he's dead.''
See U.S. Officials Say Afghan Commander Masood Dead
It was believed that there would be an offensive against his forces after his death was confirmed.
To: Recovering_Democrat
>>THE USA HAS *NOT* BOMBED KABUL AFGHANISTAN<<
There's nothing to see here-move along.
To: Recovering_Democrat
Why not???? Bin Laden, eat Nuclear!
To: tallhappy
The Israelis?
To: lasereye
They are still fighting a civil war, this may be Afghans bombing Afghans.
19
posted on
09/11/2001 3:45:26 PM PDT
by
ao98
To: Jim Noble
20
posted on
09/11/2001 3:46:25 PM PDT
by
Kerensky
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson