Posted on 09/11/2001 12:54:00 AM PDT by kattracks
Edited on 07/12/2004 3:46:37 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
Imagine for a minute that a popular restaurant in Manhattan's Times Square was blown to bits by a terrorist's bomb. Would the American public demand from the Bush administration an immediate and aggressive effort to prevent similar attacks from occurring in the future? Or would Americans prefer a wringing of hands so as not to perpetuate a "cycle of violence" or "inflame" an already volatile and dangerous enemy?
(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...
"With compelling evidence that the Bin Laden network of terrorist groups was planning to mount further attacks against Americans and other freedom-loving people, I decided America must act," Mr. Clinton told the nation at the time.
Interesting article you posted in the wee hours of 9/11. How incredibly prescient the author was. But I have absolutely no memory that Clinton bombed Bin Laden's camps in 1998. I remember other bombings, but not that one.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.