Posted on 09/10/2001 12:36:36 PM PDT by liberalism=failure
Edited on 09/03/2002 4:49:18 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
WASHINGTON -- U.S. National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, one of the most influential blacks in the Bush administration, said Sunday she doesn't think African-Americans should be compensated for the wrongs of slavery.
Rice said the United Nations conference on racism, which ended in Durban, South Africa, on Saturday without U.S. participation, looked too much at the past by focusing on the issue of reparations for slavery and on finding ways to condemn Israel.
(Excerpt) Read more at chicagotribune.com ...
Except of course in the conference itself.
She'll probably be called some kind of female uncle tom or something, but its good to see that Bush isn't "reaching out" so far as to support this reparations nonsense just so he can get more black votes that he will never ever get.
Now if only he and his justice department could stop supporting racial preferences he might even get me to come out and vote for him in '04.
How common sensical of her. Too bad there's little room for common sense anymore.
Indeed. Common sense is now "racist", no doubt an evil white male "construct" created to oppress minorities. Just like Truth and Logic.
Oh dear. Well, my favorite team is the Chicago Bears, who suck miserably.
So, then according to the doctrines of liberalism they must therefore have been oppressed in some way, and are therefore in need of reparations.
A good quarterback would be a good first payment, thank you very much.
...or, should never have gone to begin with.
As it seems the media is the primary fanner of these flames, why should Rice jump into them? As National Security Advisor, is this now an issue at that level?
At least she said what was right, most of the time anymore liberals light flames and republicans say it still isn't hot enough yet.
As it seems the media is the primary fanner of these flames, why should Rice jump into them? As National Security Advisor, is this now an issue at that level?A fair point to raise. The question is: why did she jump into it? This was a point she could have declined to comment on as it is a domestic political affair (international "reparations" just doesn't have the same resonance within the black community as the prospect of payback for slavery might). But she went ahead and denounced it full bore.
The answer is rather simple: she wanted to serve notice to the black community in particular (most notably the "black leadership") and the nation in general that this was one black person who was rejecting out of hand the siren song of reparations. It is a direct challenge to JJ, Mfume, Bond, and the rest of that gang.
I'm betting that the racist gangsters over at the NAACP have no idea what they're up against.
Anyone want to give me the over and under on how many days before JJ or someone like him (such as the Reberend Al) come out and denounce Condi as "out of the mainstream" of the black community?
Kick some ass, Condoleezza!
Be Seeing You,
Chris
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.