Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Condoleeza Rice Weighs in on Reparations and the (Racist) Racism Conference
Chicago Tribune ^ | September 10, 2001 | Tribune News Services

Posted on 09/10/2001 12:36:36 PM PDT by liberalism=failure

Edited on 09/03/2002 4:49:18 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

WASHINGTON -- U.S. National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, one of the most influential blacks in the Bush administration, said Sunday she doesn't think African-Americans should be compensated for the wrongs of slavery.

Rice said the United Nations conference on racism, which ended in Durban, South Africa, on Saturday without U.S. participation, looked too much at the past by focusing on the issue of reparations for slavery and on finding ways to condemn Israel.


(Excerpt) Read more at chicagotribune.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
(the) declaration fell far short of this demand, instead agreeing to fight racism "wherever it can be found."

Except of course in the conference itself.

She'll probably be called some kind of female uncle tom or something, but its good to see that Bush isn't "reaching out" so far as to support this reparations nonsense just so he can get more black votes that he will never ever get.

Now if only he and his justice department could stop supporting racial preferences he might even get me to come out and vote for him in '04.

1 posted on 09/10/2001 12:36:36 PM PDT by liberalism=failure
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: liberalism=failure
..And she picked Denver to go to the Super Bowl!!..
2 posted on 09/10/2001 12:39:58 PM PDT by SGCOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: liberalism=failure
"I think reparations, given the fact that there is plenty of blame to go around for slavery, plenty of blame to go around among African and Arab states and plenty of blame to go around among Western states, we are better to look forward and not point fingers backward," (emphasis mine)

How common sensical of her. Too bad there's little room for common sense anymore.

3 posted on 09/10/2001 12:41:30 PM PDT by mancini
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mancini
Too bad there's little room for common sense anymore.

Indeed. Common sense is now "racist", no doubt an evil white male "construct" created to oppress minorities. Just like Truth and Logic.

4 posted on 09/10/2001 12:45:18 PM PDT by liberalism=failure
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SGCOS
..And she picked Denver to go to the Super Bowl!!..

Oh dear. Well, my favorite team is the Chicago Bears, who suck miserably.

So, then according to the doctrines of liberalism they must therefore have been oppressed in some way, and are therefore in need of reparations.

A good quarterback would be a good first payment, thank you very much.

5 posted on 09/10/2001 12:49:04 PM PDT by liberalism=failure
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: liberalism=failure
"I think the United States made the right decision to leave," Rice said.

...or, should never have gone to begin with.

As it seems the media is the primary fanner of these flames, why should Rice jump into them? As National Security Advisor, is this now an issue at that level?

6 posted on 09/10/2001 12:58:02 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onedoug
As it seems the media is the primary fanner of these flames, why should Rice jump into them? As National Security Advisor, is this now an issue at that level?

At least she said what was right, most of the time anymore liberals light flames and republicans say it still isn't hot enough yet.

7 posted on 09/10/2001 1:03:16 PM PDT by liberalism=failure
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: onedoug
As it seems the media is the primary fanner of these flames, why should Rice jump into them? As National Security Advisor, is this now an issue at that level?

A fair point to raise. The question is: why did she jump into it? This was a point she could have declined to comment on as it is a domestic political affair (international "reparations" just doesn't have the same resonance within the black community as the prospect of payback for slavery might). But she went ahead and denounced it full bore.

The answer is rather simple: she wanted to serve notice to the black community in particular (most notably the "black leadership") and the nation in general that this was one black person who was rejecting out of hand the siren song of reparations. It is a direct challenge to JJ, Mfume, Bond, and the rest of that gang.

I'm betting that the racist gangsters over at the NAACP have no idea what they're up against.

Anyone want to give me the over and under on how many days before JJ or someone like him (such as the Reberend Al) come out and denounce Condi as "out of the mainstream" of the black community?

Kick some ass, Condoleezza!

Be Seeing You,

Chris

8 posted on 09/10/2001 1:51:39 PM PDT by section9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SGCOS
Watch out for Dickie V and the Chiefs, my friend, the sleeper in the AFC West.
9 posted on 09/10/2001 2:10:26 PM PDT by ChiefsMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SGCOS
She also likes the NY Buffalo Bills. Too bad the Bills didn't keep Flutie instead of Johnson.
10 posted on 09/10/2001 5:53:44 PM PDT by marajade (maraskywalker@earthlink.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson