Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Beijing and America’s leftwing fifth columnists
The New Australian ^ | Mon 10 September 2001 | Peter Zhang

Posted on 09/10/2001 2:42:32 AM PDT by captain11

Beijing and America’s leftwing fifth columnists

by Peter Zhang

TNA News with Commentary
Monday 10 September 2001

Any military man will tell you that no matter how well-equipped an army is what ultimately matters is its Will. Without this technology becomes nothing but an expensive accoutrement.

What struck about the attack on Serbia Beijing was not the fact that it was social democrats who ordered it (the same people who never condemned a communist regime) but their obvious fear of suffering casualties. Many people have been deceived into thinking that because Clinton and Blair forced NATO into attacking Serbia this showed courage and determination on their part. Beijing sees it differently. Moreover, it was not impressed with the aerial bombardment. To be able to plaster from a short distance a small target like Serbia does nothing to intimidate Beijing. As far as she is concerned, these are weapons she will soon command herself, including counter-measures.

Beijing’s long-term strategic objective is to drive American bases and influence out of the Pacific region and to exercise hegemony over it. Now this does not mean another Pearl Harbour but it does mean that unless China’s nationalists are kept in check, if not actually subdued, there will be a great deal of tension in the future between Washington and Beijing. I have written before that the Chinese leadership knows its history.

It knows that powers rise and fall. It is coming to the conclusion, if it hasn’t already, that America is in a state of terminal moral decline. To China's ruling elite the reelection of Clinton; his popular support; the refusal of the American people to evict him from the White House, despite his contempt for them; his treason and gutting of America’s military and the refusal of America’s so-called intellectual elites to abandon him are symptoms of a country that has lost its spirit and rejected its heritage and destiny. Nevertheless, keenly aware of its own weaknesses Beijing will move with caution for now, despite any sabre rattling.

Neverthless this interpretation of the American mood and its moral character could lead to Beijing taking a more aggressive stand in the near future against American policy and interests, even if it means uttering threats and demanding demeaning apologies. This will be done to undermine Asian countries faith in American resolve. By convincing Asian countries that America is straw man, an ally whose word cannot be counted on, it would hop to detonate a chain reaction that would result in these countries deciding to throw their lot in with Beijing.

I doubt if Americans will ever fully learn the dreadful role Clinton has played in fuelling and strengthening the PLA’s ambitions. By selling it the key to America’s military secrets and aiding the PLA in modernising its military it has brought closer the time when it can intimidate its neighbours. This is what most American observers have overlooked. To drive America out of most of the Pacific China does not have to threaten the nuclear destruction of American cities; she only has to apply subtle, and perhaps not so-subtle, threats against the rest of Asia. This is not so far fetched as many might think once one realises that Beijing seeks domination and not occupation.

The danger, I think, is that Beijing’s nationalists tend to view America as Rome viewed Carthage. If this idea should take hold the consequences could indeed be fearful. It is the same kind of idea that took hold among pre-war Japanese nationalists. But I view America in another light. To me she is not suffering a moral decline but sliding into a moral malaise. The common values that held it together are constantly under attack: ridiculed and scorned by its own intellectuals. Its history and traditions mocked and denigrated. Its moral standing in the world continuously under assault. (The recent disgraceful spectacle in Durban of leftwing moral posturing is a sickening example of what I mean). However, it’s the continuous assault by its domestic leftwing intellectuals — described by my editor as a fifth column — that has created confusion and uncertainty among the mass of its citizens.

If America is going to ever again face down genuine threats to its existence it must first win the war at home. If the so-called values of the likes of Clinton should finally prevail America will be in mortal danger. Its sheer size and reputation for revitalising itself pose dangers that tyrants cannot afford to tolerate.


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 09/10/2001 2:42:32 AM PDT by captain11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: captain11
Trying to make my day?

Some solid elements of truth here. It's America's choice...

2 posted on 09/10/2001 3:17:58 AM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: captain11
Except maybe Willy Lam, Zhang is one of the best authorities on China. I believe he is right, but I don't see much hope for America's revival.
3 posted on 09/10/2001 6:05:05 AM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: captain11
very good article, last paragraph is best;
4 posted on 09/10/2001 6:18:47 AM PDT by Red Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson