Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sen. Danforth Was MIA When Bush Needed Him
NewsMax.com ^ | Sunday, September 9, 2001 | Carl Limbacher

Posted on 09/09/2001 5:05:55 PM PDT by Paul Ross

NewsMax.com: Article Archives

NewsMax.com

 

Sunday, Sept. 9, 2001 1:22 p.m. EDT

Sen. Danforth Was MIA When Bush Needed Him

Former Republican Senator Jack Danforth can kiss the Supreme Court goodbye.

Danforth has long been touted as one of Bush's possible nominees to fill any Supreme Court vacancies.

Previously, Bush had seriously considered the moderate Republican as his vice presidential running mate.

In his new book "The Accidental President," David Kaplan reports that Danforth was missing in action when Bush's campaign sent out an urgent 911 to him.

Kaplan writes that immediately after the election Bush campaign official Don Evans asked Danforth to represent the campaign in a federal challenge to the constitutionality of the manual recount in Florida.

Danforth was vacationing with his wife in Cancun. Before he finished a second Margarita, a hostess told him he had a call. After listening to Evans, Danforth asked, "Is there a chance of us prevailing?" He then worried aloud to Evans that any lawyer filing the suit was jeopardizing his credibility.

The next morning, Evans called back and said, "We've thought about it and we want you to do this." The Bush campaign arranged to send a private plane to take Danforth to Tallahassee.

Danforth checked out of his hotel, though he remained uneasy. He decided he needed to talk to Bush himself. In his next call with Evans - with the leader of Bush's team, Jim Baker, on the line as well - Danforth said so.

Danforth assumed they'd put him right through. The phone rang, but it was Evans again "Jack," he said, "it sounds like your heart's not in this. Maybe it's best for you not to do it. Have a nice vacation."

As it turned out, a real Bush loyalist, James Baker, took the job - and did a masterful job.

To get the full story, read Washington Times' reporter Bill Sammon's "At Any Cost: How Al Gore Tried to Steal the Election," which details how the media and the Gore campaign cost Bush 10,000 votes in Florida by having the results called before polling had finished.


Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:
Presidential Race 2000



TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
Finally. The infamous 'friend' of the Bush family showed his true spots. He probably only too well knows the penalty of disloyalty to the Skull & Bones gang...
1 posted on 09/09/2001 5:05:55 PM PDT by Paul Ross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
The infamous 'friend' of the Bush family showed his true spots. He probably only too well knows the penalty of disloyalty to the Skull & Bones gang...

Danforth didn't want to do it. So what?

As it turned out, it was the right decision, for both Bush and Danforth.

Danforth is independently wealthy, and was just named special envoy to Sudan.

Sounds like Bush still has some level of confidence in him.

Your "Skull and Bones" blather is stupid.

2 posted on 09/09/2001 5:13:42 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
W just appointed him as special envoy to the Sudan.
3 posted on 09/09/2001 5:14:25 PM PDT by kylaka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kylaka
Special envoy to the Sudan, that sounds wonderful.
4 posted on 09/09/2001 5:16:29 PM PDT by Agog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
What do you mean he knows the penalty of disloyalty...what kind of logic is that; if he knew the penalty then he would have steamrolled over anyone in his way to be utterly loyal and above reproach...you are making claims disproved out of the box simply by Danforth's behavior. Besides, after his review of Waco, he revealed his colors: a grand whitewashing politico.. Baker, whatever his machinations, acquited himself as truly a loyal soldier, not only to Bush, but to the country. V's wife.
5 posted on 09/09/2001 5:17:49 PM PDT by ventana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Agog
Must need new tragets for a waco simulation.
6 posted on 09/09/2001 5:18:41 PM PDT by dts32041
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Agog,Satadru,Database,ppaul,allend,Jeremiah,JusticeLives,Mark17,John Paul Jones,LBGA,Eric in Mpls
Special envoy to the Sudan, that sounds wonderful.

ROTFLMAO! Indeed, your sarcasm is well placed. Point Proven. Silly Sinkspur, I suppose you just don't get it. Confidence in being appointed to Sudan...the HELLHOLE? Blather indeed...but not from me.

7 posted on 09/09/2001 5:28:12 PM PDT by Paul Ross (Because NO ONE is Above the Law!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: SentryoverAmerica
Amen on Danforth; hold your horses on Bush.

Danforth is as you say. Only thing he ever did worthwhile was Clarance Thomas--but that was only because he had a personal connection to Thonas as his former employer. Danforth was also in on the Souter stealth operation to slip a lefty past Bush GHW for the Supreme Court. It was absurd of the Bush campaign to even turn to Danforth after the election. His "heart isn't in it" puts it exactly right. He would have failed just as he intended to fail on the "investigation" Clinton got him to front for. He is just a tool. That there was an element in the Bush campaign that turned to him actually reveals th eproblematic side of the present White House. There are these types in there having a voice. That's the part of your point in decrying the value in electing GW anyway.

No. That's too much. I won't give that up at present. Just so long as he doesnt do something as stupid as his father in signing that 1991 "Civil Rights Act" which was a quota dream and which undermined more than a decade's slow progress in the Supreme Court. The father foolishly gave that as a peace offering after winning on Thomas. It is those conselors to the Bush presidents that we have to worry about.

9 posted on 09/09/2001 5:44:57 PM PDT by ontos-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
"Your "Skull and Bones" blather is stupid."

Methinks I've identified a liberal who has resorted to typical name-calling in the absence of substantive intellectual rebuttal.....

10 posted on 09/09/2001 6:05:10 PM PDT by yooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

I was just playing "The Weakest Link" online game along with the show. Some person in there starts raving about how Bush stole the election in the chat room. They can't even play a game without spewing that nonsense. I said, "GORE LOST--GET OVER IT!". They respond childishly "No--it was stolen, get over it."
11 posted on 09/09/2001 6:12:47 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ontos-on
Sentry is a seminar poster--best to ignore.
12 posted on 09/09/2001 6:15:05 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: yooper
Methinks I've identified a liberal who has resorted to typical name-calling in the absence of substantive intellectual rebuttal.....

Methinks I've found someone who thinks there IS substantive rebuttal to the "Skull and Bones" foolishness.

It's blather.

13 posted on 09/09/2001 6:20:22 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: yooper
sinkspur didn't say, "You are stupid." sinkspur said that something said was stupid.

Methinks your analysis is incorrect.

14 posted on 09/09/2001 6:21:11 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
If I wanted something done, Danforth would be one of the last people that I would ask. He's a wuss. Always has been, always will be.
15 posted on 09/09/2001 6:23:50 PM PDT by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
In re Sudan: I think that place needs one of our best, and not a vain third-stringer in the morality league.
16 posted on 09/09/2001 6:26:52 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
Silly Sinkspur, I suppose you just don't get it. Confidence in being appointed to Sudan...the HELLHOLE? Blather indeed...but not from me.

Well, jerkweed, we'll see how important Sudan is in the scheme of things. One of us will be right.

17 posted on 09/09/2001 6:34:14 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
Danfourth now has an opportunity to be ambassador to Sudan, one of the poorest nations on earth, a nation engaged in a terrible civil war, a nation that shoots down planes full of food for the hungry, a nation that bombs hospitals, raids villages and steals the children and uses them as slaves. He was hoping to be on the Supreme Court, instead he's going to Sudan, oh great!!!. So, I think that Bush is punishing him.

But Danfourth is a born-rich country club republican just like Bush who doesn't care for our people and won't do anything for them. Typical Country Clubber response he gave down in Cancun, he said that if he doesn't have strong assurances of success he won't participate, that is not the type of a mentality we need in our leaders. That is how all the Country Club Republicans, including Bush, think. They're not willing to fight for what's right, therefore, they will not achieve anything.

18 posted on 09/09/2001 6:37:54 PM PDT by Red Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat
"sinkspur didn't say, "You are stupid." sinkspur said that something said was stupid.

Methinks your analysis is incorrect."

Sphincter did indeed say "you are stupid". By inferring that the poster said something stupid, he inferred that the poster was stupid. It's called logic. Then again, I guess it all depends on how you define the word "said." In other words, Clintonspeak, tortured fracturing and "parsing" of a statement which intent is clearly self evident to the rational.

FWIW, I happen to agree that Skull and Bones is blatantly illogical and arrogant, but if these namby-pamby elitists wish to make fools of themselves with their exclusionary exercises, it's their business, at least until their old-boy crap is proven to harm others or their careers.

If your screen handle is accurate you really shouldn't be defending name-calling, or as you present it, objectionable editorial remarks aimed at someone's opinion....

19 posted on 09/09/2001 6:42:05 PM PDT by yooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
It's a good thing Danforth didn't take the job. It needed a tough, focused operator to pull it off. Chances are Danforth would have flunked the test. To give him some credit, maybe he realized that he was the wrong man for the job.

But in any case he'd be a terrible Supreme Court Justice.

20 posted on 09/09/2001 6:44:49 PM PDT by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson