You asserted that Missler had "Ph.D, B.A. all that good stuff in astrophysics ..." [snip]. Missler's own website shows this is NOT true. Thus, it is NOT Missler who is lying, but you who appears to be making untrue statements.
As for me not making "any case," I once again remind you that you have the burden of proof, not me, as it is you who have asserted that "everything decays" and that the speed of light has decayed. I have merely pointed out that the vast preponderance of scientists, who DO have degrees in physics and astrophysics, subscribe to position that is contrary to your assertion.
I have provided you with examples of four things that have never been seen to decay on their own, to wit: protons, photons, neutrinos, and electrons. If your assertion that ALL things decay were true, then it would be true for these four nuclear particles. Yet you have cited not a scintilla of evidence that any have ever decayed. Nor have you provided us with an over-arching scientific principle that would require the decay of everything that would apply to the speed of light.
Lastly, I was unaware that pointing out errors constituted a "personal attack." I am also perplexed by your bizarre characterization that pointing out errors could somehow be motivated by "my religious beliefs," as I have made no statement regarding same.