Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: telos
SCROTUS can be tyrannical, and wrong; especially when staffed by political hacks and charlatans.

The Supreme Court has been wrong on many occasions; judicial activism at all levels of the system can be construed as tyrannical in that it upsets the balance of powers by usurping the power of Congress to make laws. But this is the system that the U.S. Constitution that we all know and love has allowed. If you don't agree with a law, then the court system is one place to challenge that law. Your state legislature or Congress is another.

Once again, everybody taking on the role as private interpreter of what is legal and what isn't is the beginning of anarchy. If you think tyranny doesn't recognize your God-given rights, just wait until everyone starts interpreting the laws in their own way and Anarchy takes over. Anarchy doesn't recognize anyone's rights. Just look at any WTO protester. Anarchists don't give a sh** about your rights.

125 posted on 09/09/2001 4:58:19 PM PDT by wimpycat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]


To: wimpycat
I think you are wrong. I think the Clintons and Janet Reno would pat you on the head for your response. Making a lot of noise is very healthy; have respect for the sovereign dignity of your fellow citizens, the political priesthood may be sanctimonious, but it is in no sense sacred.
126 posted on 09/09/2001 5:13:24 PM PDT by telos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson