Replies

Kudos to dogbyte12 for illuminating with prolonged special focus another angle on the Condit case that, when turned over, reveals nothing but worms, just like all the others. You are exactly right in insisting that an innocent man would be able to account precisely for his whereabouts on any of those several critical days: Condit can't do that and will never get corroboration for a false timeline unless he's able to enlist some of his ever-dwindling pool of bitter-end defenders like staff or family. The timeline and his account of it is just beginning to show its seams now; give it real prosecutorial scrutiny and it will fall apart. Unless this case is settled in a court of law, though, and Condit is subjected to tough questioning, it will all go away and he will save his sorry ass the way it looks like he's planning to, simply announcing that he's considering not running again. His own disappearing will be the political payoff that will satisfy all those who want to see him go away. He's about as likely to be brought to justice as Chandra Levy's body is likely to be found. We are now in an uncharacteristically quiet and fallow period in this scandal. The public at large knows NONE of the details we know; they can barely remember or get straight a fraction of the facts that have come out in the mainstream media since mid-May, and hence there will be no "public outcry" for the very guilty Mr. Condit to get his just desserts.

This is just a theory, but lets have some input. Someone namely Condit or Mrs. Condit or hired help kills Chandra at her appartment in a way that left no blood evidence, such as strangling, or being shot up with something lethel. The body could not be removed at that particular time, so they take the keys to the place in order to either come back later to clean up the mess, or have someone else come back to clean up.

You are exactly right in insisting that an innocent man would be able to account precisely for his whereabouts on any of those several critical days

One theory I toyed with for a while is that Condit was sleeping with somebody else other than Chandra between 1-3:30PM, that is why he can't tell us what he was doing. I don't know though, it doesn't fly after all the other women came out though. Is it better to be thought of as a murderer, or that he was doing just another in a long string of women?

Something is wrotten in Denmark though. Condit obviously was doing SOMETHING from 1PM to 3:30PM that he is too embarassed to let us know. I wish Larry King wasn't so hopeless and senile. I wish it were an act and "Super Larry" came out and whacked Mike Dayton during the interview.

If King whacked Dayton and pressed him for specific details of the days of the 1st and 17th it would have been a thing of beauty. My question is why Connie Chung, Newsweek, The sacramento reporter, Vanity Fair, The Merced paper, and Larry King didn't try to pin Condit and Dayton down when they had a chance.

Connie Chung was free to ask any question she wanted, so she asked the affair question about 5 gazillion times even though Condit wouldn't respond. If she just took a minute of those questions away and asked him to explain the false timeline, 1-3:30PM and May 17th it would have at least put him on the record and the FBI and DC police could have tried to verify.