Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congress Mulls Taking White House to Court
Reuters ^ | Septmeber 7, 2001 | Susan Cornwell/Reuters

Posted on 09/07/2001 7:01:45 PM PDT by riley1992

Congress Mulls Taking White House to Court

Last Updated: September 07, 2001 05:45 PM ET

By Susan Cornwell

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Congress' investigative arm moved on Friday toward what would be an unprecedented court fight with the White House to get information about possible industry influence on the administration's energy policy.

The General Accounting Office threatened to take the Bush administration to court after the White House refused to give details of how its energy task force crafted proposals that were announced in May after a series of closed-door meetings.

Critics, including Democratic congressmen, suspect industry influence on the Bush administration. Vice President Dick Cheney, who headed the energy task force, is a former executive with Hallibruton, an oil services firm.

Among other things, the accounting office wants the names of the industry executives the energy task force met while making the policy. But the White House, having handed over some documents to the GAO, this week said it would provide no more.

"We are finalizing discussions with key congressional leaders and are preparing for possible litigation," Comptroller General David Walker, head of the GAO, said in a statement.

"This is a very significant matter with significant potential implications for the GAO, Congress and the American people," he declared.

Under the law, the GAO may bring a civil action in a U.S. district court to require agencies -- including the White House -- to produce records, a GAO spokesman said.

But congressional sources could not remember a case when the GAO had done so.

They said that in the past the investigative office's requests for material had been met short of a courtroom battle -- notably a decade ago, when the GAO obtained details of health care task force meetings from former first lady Hillary Rodham Clinton.

"STANDING ON PRINCIPLE"

The Bush White House said it was "standing on principle". Spokesman Ari Fleischer said the information sought by the GAO was not a matter of public purview.

"It is not a matter of public purview for each and every meeting, of each and every minute, of the president and the vice president each and every day to be reported publicly," he said.

The Bush energy policy developed by the task force called for stimulating production of coal, oil and nuclear power as well as conservation measures.

Two Democratic congressmen asked the GAO last spring to investigate the energy task force's proceedings, saying Congress and the public had a right under the law to know how the energy policy was developed.

Reps. John Dingell of Michigan and Henry Waxman of California questioned whether White House closed-door meetings with energy executives violated the Federal Advisory Committee Act, which requires public meetings when outside experts are involved in shaping government policy.

Cheney's office provided some information about the task force's finances, but spurned a Sept. 6 deadline for handing over more details, saying the GAO had no right to demand them.

The GAO statement said that the information it received from the White House "is clearly inadequate."

It also said several principles were at stake, "including the right of Congress to oversee the executive branch, and the need for transparency and accountability in connection with the development and execution of federal government policies."


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 09/07/2001 7:01:45 PM PDT by riley1992
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: ratcat
If nothing untoward was done, I see no reason not to hand over what was requested.
3 posted on 09/07/2001 7:42:17 PM PDT by riley1992
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: riley1992
So. If Waxman prevails, neither the President, nor the Vice-President, nor any cabinet official, can have a private meeting with anybody, for any reason.
4 posted on 09/07/2001 7:45:11 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
questioned whether White House closed-door meetings with energy executives violated the Federal Advisory Committee Act, which requires public meetings when outside experts are involved in shaping government policy.

So, if this turns out to be a violation, will it be okay to overlook it since the charge was leveled by a Democrat at a Republican?

5 posted on 09/07/2001 7:51:22 PM PDT by riley1992
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Ah, but while Nostralitis Waxman was defending his criminal champions in the sinkEmperor administration, he fought efforts at disclosure tooth and nostril.

Henry is a sleazy little man, twisting truth at every turn. His brand of socilaist societal engineering is well designed to destroy the governmental institutions as they're used to propel democrats to ultimate power. With the sleeping populace, he and his ilk may actally succeed.

6 posted on 09/07/2001 7:53:25 PM PDT by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: riley1992
I wish Congress had the guts to investigate Condit.
7 posted on 09/07/2001 7:56:37 PM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: riley1992
So, if this turns out to be a violation, will it be okay to overlook it since the charge was leveled by a Democrat at a Republican?

I suppose whether or not it is a violation is the issue at hand. If the GAO takes it to court, I presume it will go to the Supreme Court. If Cheney loses, he loses.

8 posted on 09/07/2001 7:59:14 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: riley1992
It also said several principles were at stake, "including the right of Congress to oversee the executive branch, and the need for transparency and accountability in connection with the development and execution of federal government policies.


I thought the Executive,Legislative,Judiciary were all equal.If the congress has the right to "oversee" the Executive,that means they're not equal but the congress is,shall we say, more equal! Baloney!

9 posted on 09/07/2001 8:00:27 PM PDT by Lady In Blue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: riley1992
If Keyes was the president,what do you think he would have told Waxman and congress? I don't for a minute believe that he would stand for this nonsense.
10 posted on 09/07/2001 8:03:47 PM PDT by Lady In Blue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lady In Blue
In the system of checks and balances, they are all supposed to be equal but that also means that Congress is there also to keep the Executive Branch in line.
11 posted on 09/07/2001 8:04:04 PM PDT by riley1992
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: riley1992
The GAO is in the pocket of the Democrats & they are definitely overstepping their authority. Do not think for a minute that Cheney doesn't have his ducks in a row & he definitely has gotten excellent legal advice (remember Ted Olson & the Supreme Court) HeeHee. The reason Cheney & the WH are fighting this is just like he said on Nightline a few weeks ago. "Principle". If they don't fight this, they will set a precedent & the Dems will make their lives hell from now on. First, the Energy taskforce is made up SOLELY OF BUSH ADMINISTRATION OFFICIALS.....NO OUTSIDERS. That is perfectly legal. Also, they met with all kind of folks to get information on energy. Who were they supposed to get info from, the NEA??(sarcasm). They also met with labor unions & environmentalists as well. I read an article in the LA Times recently about two of the people they met with (two lefties). It was funny. This is paraphrased from what these two guys said:

They said "We have to admit that we are two of the people that VP Cheney's taskforce met with. If the GOP every found out that he met with "the likes of us", they would kick him out of the party. You see, we are solar energy producers."

We can all be assured that there was no funny business going on with the VP & his energy taskforce. You see, we now have honor & integrity in the WH. He is just drawing a line in the sand with the Democraps & the meddling GAO. He told Ted Koppel on Nightline he would go to court if he had to. I look for the WH to take this all the way to the Supreme Court if they have to.

12 posted on 09/07/2001 9:52:02 PM PDT by nightowl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson