Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Aristophanes
It occurs to me that if the majority of bishops in America had views and attitudes similar to Bruskewitz, there'd be no need for the SSPX.
23 posted on 09/06/2001 10:41:52 PM PDT by Aristophanes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Aristophanes
It occurs to me that if the majority of bishops in America had views and attitudes similar to Bruskewitz, there'd be no need for the SSPX.
That’s just it. The Church indicates that the Society’s Mass is valid, but illicit. Similar to how the Church views the Orthodox Church’s Masses. That is, you can attend if there is no valid Catholic Mass nearby. So, if you live in a diocese like Hawaii, where there may not be a valid Mass, it might be OK to go to the SSPX. But in Bishop Bruskewitz’s diocese one would be hard pressed to say there are no valid Masses. The Church indicates that a preference for Latin is not a good enough reason to go Society, just like a preference for Greek would not be a good enough reason to go Orthodox. So, where there are valid Masses, he has every reason to clear up the confusion and make their status clear to the faithful.

patent

25 posted on 09/06/2001 11:42:50 PM PDT by patent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson