Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ClancyJ
Any radical, blasphemous depiction of Christ is allowed - why? Free speech. Why is free speech only for those that tear down religion and never for those that support religion?

Not on my dime. Reverent or blasphemous, I don't want the government subsidizing anyone's religious expression. If you want to drag the NEA into this, I am of course against their subsidies as well.

68 posted on 09/06/2001 3:43:21 PM PDT by Britton J Wingfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Britton J Wingfield
Well they are and you can't stop it. Endowments to the arts by taxpayer funds is going on each year. Each year the Boston Museum finds a way to allow an artist to depict Jesus in derogative or obscene ways and we have to take it. I will never visit the Boston Museum because of this fact.
79 posted on 09/06/2001 8:21:25 PM PDT by ClancyJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson