To: ClancyJ
Any radical, blasphemous depiction of Christ is allowed - why? Free speech. Why is free speech only for those that tear down religion and never for those that support religion? Not on my dime. Reverent or blasphemous, I don't want the government subsidizing anyone's religious expression. If you want to drag the NEA into this, I am of course against their subsidies as well.
To: Britton J Wingfield
Well they are and you can't stop it. Endowments to the arts by taxpayer funds is going on each year. Each year the Boston Museum finds a way to allow an artist to depict Jesus in derogative or obscene ways and we have to take it. I will never visit the Boston Museum because of this fact.
79 posted on
09/06/2001 8:21:25 PM PDT by
ClancyJ
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson