To: HalfIrish
You seem to be taking my pointing out that there is a constitutional argument that can be made as me being advocating that this is the correct course of action.
That is not the case, at all.
To: Hugh Akston
I see. You are saying the constitution is only a useful tool to prop up a pro-Bush argument. Understood.
To: Hugh Akston
Re-reading your post, it appears I completely misunderstood it the first time around. DOH! So, you're not making a constitutional argument for Bush's actions?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson