Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RED LIGHT CAMERA TICKETS DISMISSED
KFMB.com/WorldNetDaily ^ | 6-4-2001 | KFMB.com Staff

Posted on 09/05/2001 2:47:34 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP

RED LIGHT CAMERA TICKETS DISMISSED

(09-04-2001) - A judge Tuesday dismissed 250 tickets issued through San Diego's red light camera program, ruling that a private contractor's involvement in the system made evidence inadmissable [sic] at trial.

Superior Court Judge Ronald Styn ruled that the city's decision to contract with Lockheed Martin to run the program, combined with a contingency fee, made evidence gathered from the red light cameras "unreliable" and "untrustworthy."

Styn, in upholding his Aug. 15 tentative decision, ruled that the city failed to operate the red light system as outlined by the Legislature.

He also said the agreement for Lockheed Martin to get $70 for each $271 ticket paid made evidence obtained from the system inadmissable [sic] in court.

City officials will decide soon whether to appeal Styn's ruling, Deputy City Attorney Steven Hansen said.

Attorneys in the case said the judge's ruling affects only the 250 red light citations that were consolidated for trial.

A class action lawsuit filed Thursday by four groups of plaintiffs alleges Lockheed Martin was illegally allowed to run the red light program, and that the private company had an illegal financial incentive by taking the $70 for each ticket paid.

All 19 red light cameras in the city of San Diego have been turned off pending completion of an inspection of the entire system.

A hearing is scheduled Oct. 4 on a defense motion to disqualify the San Diego City Attorney's Office from prosecuting any pending or future red light cases.

What do you think of red-light cameras to enforce traffic laws? <-----Weigh in with your opinion here!


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: photoradar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
Please bump this article to keep it off the bottom! Thanks!
1 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
What do you think of red-light cameras to enforce traffic laws?

Should be banned 35.19% (38)
Just a revenue generator for police 25.93% (28)
Disturbing invasion of privacy 18.52% (20)
Good concept, but ripe for abuse 9.26% (10)
I have the feeling I'm being watched right this second! 7.41% (8)
Excellent tool, should be more of them 2.78% (3)
Not sure 0.93% (1)
I'm indifferent to them 0.00% (0)
Other 0.00% (0)
--------------------
TOTAL VOTES: 108

2 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: MeeknMing
bump
5 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by ChadGore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
I take issue with one of these, its not to get money for the police depts, it is money for the politicians at city hall, When Chief of Police I was told by the mayor 'we need more money in fines to run the city', I asked 'Oh? you mean the police depart. is a money making agency?, He got hot as heck.
6 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by gulfcoast6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gulfcoast6
I take issue with one of these, its not to get money for the police depts, it is money for the politicians at city hall, When Chief of Police I was told by the mayor 'we need more money in fines to run the city', I asked 'Oh? you mean the police depart. is a money making agency?, He got hot as heck.

LOL Good for you! He got hot as heck, huh? I bet he got over it though? :-)

7 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Ok Where to Begin? HMMMM Alright Atown on the eastern border of the city of Syracuse,N.Y. called Dewitt has Cameras at a major intersection. Their Purpose is undisclosed , When I ask a highway employee he stated it's for redlight violators, When I asked a public official HE claims they're for catching the bad guys. Anyways these cameras are only about a mile away from Lockheed Martin,s radar faciluty I wonder if the Town of dewitt cut deal to beta test the cameras for lockheed???????
8 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by SirTaurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BENSON_CARTER,TLBSHOW,FREEDOMFIRST
BTTT
9 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by SirTaurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late,2right
Bump
10 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by SirTaurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
So does this ruling set a precedent? Are all tickets issued from cameras null and void?
11 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by HEFFERNAN2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Why does this poll require the entry of an email address to participate? I'm on enough spam lists as it is.
12 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by strela
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirTaurus
They'll appeal.
13 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by b4its2late
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: strela, ALL
Why does this poll require the entry of an email address to participate? I'm on enough spam lists as it is.

It's World Net Daily and they won't spam you.

They require e-mail to vote for good reason. A few months ago, they were inundated with homosexuals multiple voting on a poll. When I saw the results of the poll and weighed in the content/issue of the poll, I knew the results had been skewed by these weirdos leaping into the poll. Shortly after that, they required e-mail login to prevent multiple voting.

I understand your concern, but don't be alarmed or fear for "spamming." Thanks for letting me know. ;-)

14 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: gobshite
Red-light or speed-sensor ticket surveillance systems were shot down by an Arizona high court (don't know if it was Supreme) in 1987. The decision was scathing and made without prejudice, meaning the author didn't ever want to return to the issue. Case-closed. Speed sensors and cameras for the purpose of presenting a minor arrest warrant (which is what a misdemeanor traffic ticket is) are NOT LEGAL.

Perhaps, but explain then why Scottsdale is currently using them?

15 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by cruiserman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gulfcoast6
I take issue with one of these, its not to get money for the police depts, it is money for the politicians at city hall, When Chief of Police I was told by the mayor 'we need more money in fines to run the city', I asked 'Oh? you mean the police depart. is a money making agency?, He got hot as heck.

I have a similar beef. IMHO, for many years now, law enforcement agencies see themselves as revenue-generators. Its echoed in the speeches of other elected officials as well. How many times have you heard this: "Our city/county has lost $X over the past three years due to unpaid traffic tickets." They actually see "fines" as revenue due them, and if you dont pay, then you have stolen from them and they have lost revenue. It sickens me.

16 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by FreeTally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: gulfcoast6
You were a REO in LEO clothing?? Naaaaaaah!?

REO: (Revenue Enhancement Officer)

17 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by sam_paine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
I knew the results had been skewed by these weirdos leaping into the poll.

Oh please. As if "freeping a poll" is not common practice around here.

Whether it's wierdo homo's or libertarian freepers, internet polls are always skewed. Hell, all polls are skewed.

18 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by sam_paine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: FreeTally
They actually see "fines" as revenue due them,

Well, they have to, don't they? Fines have to be accounted for as "assets due." If they don't materialize, then they have to account for them as a loss. Maybe if they had a loooockbooooxxxx..... Bwahhaaaa!

19 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by sam_paine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SirTaurus
I wonder if the Town of dewitt cut deal

Don't wonder, FOIL their records. (Freedom of information lawsuit)

20 posted on 12/31/1969 4:00:00 PM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson