Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal court strikes down injunctions limiting tear gas use near Portland ICE Facility
KATUS news ^ | 11/10/26

Posted on 11/10/2026 11:57:26 AM PST by CFW

PORTLAND, Ore. (KATU) — New federal appeals court rulings will change how protests and crowd control are handled around the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) building in south Portland, and what rights demonstrators, journalists and nearby residents hold under the law.

A panel of Ninth Circuit judges vacated major preliminary injunctions that previously barred federal officers’ use of non-lethal crowd-control measures like tear gas or pepper balls. It also applied strict limits on when and how they could deploy munitions near the Portland ICE facility.

In both decisions handed down Tuesday, the judges sided 2-1 with the Trump administration.

KATU has been following this unfolding legal battle, which began after a year of frequent and sometimes chaotic protests outside the facility.

[snip]

On appeal, the Ninth Circuit panel disagreed with several key points in the lower court’s ruling, saying that based on established legal precedent, officers do not need to wait for an imminent threat of physical harm before deploying non-lethal force to disperse disorderly crowds or restore order.

(Excerpt) Read more at katu.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: ice; ninthcircuit; portland; trump

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


1 posted on 11/10/2026 11:57:26 AM PST by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CFW

The majority ruled that agents can use crowd-control weapons to restore order without facing an imminent threat of physical harm. It found insufficient evidence that agents deliberately targeted peaceful protesters or journalists for exercising their First Amendment rights.

The majority also found the restrictions too broad because they covered people beyond the five plaintiffs. It ruled that requiring more visible identifying markings on agents’ uniforms exceeded the district court’s authority.

Link to opinion:

https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2026/11/10/26-1609.pdf


2 posted on 11/10/2026 11:58:53 AM PST by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Good. Time for water cannons. Perfect in the winter


3 posted on 11/10/2026 12:00:00 PM PST by cyclotic (Don’t be part of the problem. Be the entire problem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

NONE OF THIS IS A GAME OF “CAPTAIN, MAY I”?.


4 posted on 11/10/2026 12:04:16 PM PST by ridesthemiles (not giving up on TRUMP---EVER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson