Posted on 10/19/2026 10:02:40 PM PDT by Freeleesy
Abdul El-Sayed is being slammed over a resurfaced Columbia University research paper he authored with a “racist and eugenics outcome” that concluded Arab women should only breed with their own kind for optimal health outcomes.
El-Sayed — who has repeatedly called himself a physician though he never completed his medical school residency — warned in the 2011 paper published in the “Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health” of the hazards of “interethnic mating” — which he insisted increased the risk of children being born premature.
“Our findings suggest that interethnic mating may be associated with increased risk for adverse birth outcomes among Arab ethnicity mothers,” he stated, back then going by Abdulrahman M. El-Sayed.
El-Sayed published a 2011 paper titled “Interethnic mating and risk for preterm birth among Arab American mothers.”
El-Sayed began the paper, titled “Interethnic mating and risk for preterm birth among Arab American mothers,” with the bold claim that Arab mothers, “a growing ethnic group,” have “systematically better birth outcomes” than white mothers.
... Critics savaged the paper as pseudoscience.
“This is ‘science’ with “a pre-ordained racist & eugenics outcome,” wrote Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tx.) on X. “Scary stuff.”
Others wondered what the radical Democrat’s real motivation was to even research the topic.
“Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed’s scientific research is…odd. Arab mothers who engage in ‘interethnic mating’ have worse birth outcomes than those who mate with Arab men?” ripped John David Haltigan, an Honorary Research Fellow at the University of Buckingham. “Why research this?”...
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
Supposedly Hitler was impressed by the American eugenics theories from the Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger who wanted the dilution of racial superiority of whites to be reduced by having black women have more abortions. Hitler considered common Americans to be “mongrels.”
Very sick stuff.
I just watched a video today describing the high percentages of Muslims who marry their 1st and 2nd cousins.
In some countries, it’s nearly 40%.
No wonder the IQ levels are what they are.
el-Sayed deleted hundreds of old social media and online statements supposedly so they would not “confuse” people with “lack of context”.
But thank goodness a few scraps from his writings survived like this one.
>> Very sick stuff.
Indeed.
One wonders how anyone in Michigan (except dyed-in-the-wool mooselimbs) could possibly support him.
Many Orthodox Jews are against interfaith marriage which is considered the silent holocaust. Shoah Shketa, in romanticized Hebrew.
But when you think about it, they probably should.
This was my father's belief And this is also mine: Let the corn be all one sheaf— And the grapes be all one vine, Ere our children's teeth are set on edge By bitter bread and wine.
“Arab women should only breed with their own kind “
I am certain, there is a group of liberal women out there cheering this insanity on. Many are LGBTQ. The are probably in favor of sharia law as well. They have no idea what they support. Someone explain to me how this sounds different than what the NAZI’s we’re selling.
“Dr” El-Sayed published a 2011 paper titled “Interethnic mating and risk for preterm birth among Arab American mothers” claiming the ethnic group, has “systematically better birth outcomes” than white mothers.
In some countries, it’s nearly 40%.
In Pakistan, it is more like 55%
I agree with him..Arab women should only mate with arab men and Arab me should only be allowed to mate with arab women, goats and donkeys.
I think it is a good policy overall.
Goats hardest hit.
Oh, an NIH study says... Well, time to mask up again I suppose and get quintuple boosted. Until we reestablish integrity in the sciences all such stuff should be just taken as propaganda - whether it comes from El-Sayed or from a DEI infested institute. This is the problem - just stop believing anything of this kind. And I am a physicist. In the infamous words of JR Ewing, once you abandon integrity the rest is easy. Or as House said “everyone lies.”
They should mate with their own. Over in yemen or afghanistan and stay there..
Until we reestablish integrity in the sciences all such stuff should be just taken
as propaganda - whether it comes from El-Sayed or from a DEI infested institute.
Good advice.....thx.
Hitler did the “T Plan” thanks to Maggie.
Marrying your first cousin increases the health risks for any children blood relatives have together.
When first cousins have children, the risk of genetic and developmental problems rises because they share a higher number of identical genes:
• Autosomal Recessive Disorders: Children of first cousins face a 4% to 7% risk of severe genetic birth defects or recessive conditions (such as cystic fibrosis, sickle cell anemia, or rare metabolic disorders) compared to a 2% to 3% risk for unrelated parents.
• Developmental and Physical Issues: Studies like the Born in Bradford Study via BBC News indicate that children of first cousins can experience higher rates of speech or language delays and lower developmental scores by age five.
• Cumulative Risk: If a family has a history of multiple generations of cousin marriages, that risk can rise higher (around 10% to 15%) due to increased genetic similarity (homozygosity).
In the United States, first-cousin marriage is prohibited or criminalized in 24 states.
Internationally, several countries (such as Norway and Sweden) have restricted or banned first-cousin marriage over public health and child welfare concerns.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.