Posted on 09/16/2026 7:56:10 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
The government announced a major tax reform at the Canada Investment Summit that will allow businesses to write off investments.
The productivity mega-deduction will allow companies to expense the total cost of new investments across a number of sectors, including machinery, equipment, clean energy, zero-emission vehicles and more.
"Our goal is simple — to make Canada the most attractive place in the G7 to invest," Prime Minister Mark Carney said at the summit.
The program is an expansion of the government's earlier productivity super-deduction outlined in last year's budget, which initially extended to a limited selection of investments in things like equipment, machinery and technology. That meant only about 15 per cent of possible investments were covered initially, but the prime minister said the expansion means two-thirds of assets will now be eligible.
Carney added during a media scrum that the expansion to more sectors would give business leaders the freedom to invest wherever they saw the most value. He also saw it as one of the best ways to boost productivity — an area where the country has long lagged.
In the past, Canadian companies have been able to recoup costs over the lifetime of a project, said Randall Bartlett, deputy chief economist at Desjardins. But this program gives that money back immediately, which could free up investors to put more money into new projects.
"This is meant to provide significant incentives for companies to invest and invest very quickly," Bartlett said.
He said that makes Canada very competitive on the tax front compared to other countries. The government says the change would slash Canada's marginal effective tax rate — a measure of tax on businesses used to compare tax competitiveness between nations — from 13 per cent down to 6.4 per cent, making it the lowest of any country in the G7.
And that could be a big help especially amid the trade war, Bartlett said. It could give companies a reason to stay in Canada, rather than moving production south of the border, and help them make investments they've been holding off on due to uncertainty.
But it will also cost an estimated $36 billion over five years. Bartlett said revenue brought in from high oil prices means the extra government spending isn't too much of an issue in the short run, but the government will have to make sure it has the coffers to sustain that kind of spending long-term.
Jim Stanford, economist and director at the Centre for Future Work, says the plan isn't so new, since its an expansion of an old program.
But he says it seems like a better framework than an across-the-board corporate tax cut, which wouldn't require businesses to reinvest those savings, and may not lead to results.
"In this case ... you have to pay to play. If you're not investing in new capital in Canada, then the deduction is worthless," Stanford said.
"So as a model, it's not bad."
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
Con Man Carney is destroying Canada so why would anyone invest there
Investors are fleeing Canada. Canada experienced a historic capital exodus between 2015 and 2024, with over $1 trillion in net investment leaving the country, though recent government summits and policy changes aim to reverse the trend.
simply finally copying a key provision of the great big beautiful tax bill, which eliminated mult-decade expensing of capital expenditures in favor of fully expensing all capital expenditures the year they were expended ...
During the Plandemic, Canada would freeze and/or seize bank accounts of people who told the truth, or protested.
Why would anyone invest in such a place?
Why would anyone invest in a place that at the moment is reaching out to the sclerotic European Union?
Canadian voters & Carney have been making a lot of stupid decisions lately.
This isn’t one of those stupid decisions.
It is actually a pretty good one.
However, once firms take advantage of the program, in the year the equipment is expensed, there may be no Canadian federal income tax paid. When that happens watch left-wing Canadians scream about how corporations are not paying their fair share.
I mentioned this in a post awhile back about Canada’s GDP debt ratio between their government, businesses, and individuals.
Their federal debt ratio isn’t bad, but the other two are on the high end.
Carney is willing to burn some of that federal credit up and try to do something positive for his business sector & by extension his people.
You mean all the third world illiterate imports and putting them on welfare aren’t super charging the Canadian economy?
> mega-deduction
Wait... so lowering taxes is good for the economy? Shocking!
That’s not quite the whole story, though.
You’re right; from 2015 to 2024 Canada was losing inward investment.
Two large German car manufacturers were being schmoozed by the USA for the last seven or so years, Canada too, and that pre-2025 climate was always the problem for Canada.
I’m talking about Audi and Volkswagen.
The USA literally had the best arguments. So, deals were in the works between the German companies and the USA.
Then along came Trump’s three-way tariffs against the EU, Mexico, and Canada. Trump’s favorite word, tariffs! Ignoring literally every lesson from history, about what actually happens if a country *abuses* tariffs.
Trump literally sabotaged his own stated aim of inducing said companies to grow their presence in the USA, by punishing the companies he was trying to woo.
The cost to Audi and Volkswagen of doing the deals with the USA skyrocketed, and the ambition of creating jobs and growing the market in the USA was outweighed by the risks. In effect they were going to end up millions (if not billions) out of profit UP FRONT while building the capacity in the USA, at the same time that tariffs would create inflation across the USA making high-end expensive German brand cars a lot harder to sell.
Punishing the companies that you want to invest, and creating an inflation pressure that’d suppress the buyer market, at the same time, was literally the antithesis of “art of the deal”.
A great deal is one where both sides are getting a benefit from the deal. A crap deal is where both sides end up saddled with big headaches. Trump’s tariff obsession turned a no-brainer into a turd sandwich. The only person who would’ve benefited if the deal had gone ahead would’ve been the negotiator - who could brag about how he got the signatures on paper even if everyone else thinks the deal is a total turd sandwich.
To paraphrase one commentator, the switch from USA to Canada, from the VW perspective, wasn’t even a question of diplomacy or politics, it was basic arithmetic.
Trump’s aggressive tariffs meant the math simply didn’t work in the USA’s favor. Carney, not Trump, mastered the “art of the deal” by making the math around switching to Ontario look fantastic by comparison.
So, instead of massively boosting its American production base, Volkswagen has committed $7 billion to build a massive gigafactory - an electric vehicle battery plant through its subsidiary PowerCo in St. Thomas, Ontario.
Art of the Deal. Carney’s got it, Trump’s lost it.
He is such a POS.
Was the legislation designed by chinese belt and road investment strategists?
Exactly! Tax breaks for the rich!
All that being said major manufacturing in Canada simply isn't a good way to go. You'd get the same perks from President Trump if you located in the USA. If Canada tries any tariff business on USA goods then you don't loose much of a market at all.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.