Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump brands Burnham as 'extremely liberal' in first comments on frontrunner to be next PM
LBC ^ | June 24, 2026 | Chay Quinn

Posted on 06/24/2026 2:54:14 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican

Speaking after an Oval Office meeting with NATO chief Mark Rutte, the President branded Mr Burnham as "extremely liberal" when asked about what he knew of the former Manchester mayor.

He told reporters: "I don't know anything. I see that he was, I guess, the mayor of a town.

"I hear he's extremely liberal. Extremely. So that means he probably won't open up the North Sea".

The Labour government's reluctance to drill for oil in the North Sea has been a common bugbear of Mr Trump's.

He added: "You know, I gave Keir Starmer some pretty good advice. I said, open up the North Sea."

Discussing the state of the UK oil industry in the UK, the President said he has "every oil company come to see him" about having "access to the UK".

He said: "I have had every oil company come to see me. 'Sir, could you give us access to the UK? We would do anything to drill in the North Sea'.

"The amazing thing is they buy their oil from Norway, which gets the offer of the North Sea. Think of it, and they pay a big premium.

"Norway's got now $2trillion in the bank and UK is dying, so they should open up the North Sea, and it's an easy one. And a lot of good things are going to happen."

(Excerpt) Read more at lbc.co.uk ...


TOPICS: United Kingdom
KEYWORDS:

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


1 posted on 06/24/2026 2:54:14 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

The stupidity of this is breathtaking. They won’t open North Sea oil harvesting to appease the Climate Nazi’s. So they buy it from Norway who gets it from… the North Sea.


2 posted on 06/24/2026 3:02:09 PM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
Burnham is a far left extremist, which is good, because that will make sure Labour loses the next general election.
3 posted on 06/24/2026 3:03:17 PM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

Yeah but not for another 3 years.


4 posted on 06/24/2026 3:04:00 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

It is possible Burnham may exploit the Reform/Restore split and call a snap election. If it worked it would cement Labour’s grip on power but it would be risky as hell


5 posted on 06/24/2026 3:07:03 PM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy
Whoever they buy oil from, those people are drilling it from somewhere.
Oil doesn't fall from the sky.
Funny thing is, Norway is currently one of the richest countries on the planet from their Sovereign Fund, most of who's money come from North Sea oil.
6 posted on 06/24/2026 3:08:00 PM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy
Restore didn't do much of anything in the local government elections which was only last month.
Reform dominated both Labour and the Conservatives.
7 posted on 06/24/2026 3:11:02 PM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe; MinorityRepublican

Fun fact: Labour won the last UK general election with only 34% of the popular vote. Other parties split the remainder.

If Reform, Restore, and the pathetic Tories cannot come to some agreement, Labour certainly could cruise to another win in 2029.

Side point:
As I see it, this agreement would have to carve out districts. For example, if Reform is strong in a district, Restore and the Tories would have to agree not to run a candidate there. No opposition vote splitting.

MinorityRepublican, you know more about this than I do. Does my take make sense?


8 posted on 06/24/2026 3:17:15 PM PDT by Leaning Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

True but Restore has gained enough strength to be a spoiler. Too bad because Restore is what is needed and l don’t think they can win. Too many of the sheep are scared of them.


9 posted on 06/24/2026 3:24:01 PM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

I thought Burnham was a socialist?

If so, he’s not liberal of any way kind or form. Socialism is a postliberal ideology. Socialists hate liberalism and they’ve said it. But even if they don’t say it, they do it they legislate it and they act on it. Socialists are destructive of liberalism.


10 posted on 06/24/2026 3:32:40 PM PDT by ProgressingAmerica (The U.S. Constitution is not a suicide pact. Progressivism is a suicide pact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

Your take makes perfect sense but l think it’s extremely unlikely. That degree of co-operation is unprecedented and exactly what is needed to save England but l just don’t see it.


11 posted on 06/24/2026 3:34:28 PM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right
As I see it, this agreement would have to carve out districts. For example, if Reform is strong in a district, Restore and the Tories would have to agree not to run a candidate there. No opposition vote splitting.

They should do that.

But will it happen?

No.

Rupert Lowe and Nigel Farage should mend fences and come to an agreement for the next general election.

12 posted on 06/24/2026 3:38:27 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy
That degree of co-operation is unprecedented and exactly what is needed to save England but l just don’t see it.

The first step is to recognize that they have a problem. They're too late. All of this should have happened 10 years ago before Boris Johnson.

13 posted on 06/24/2026 3:40:21 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

14 posted on 06/24/2026 3:43:15 PM PDT by jdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

Restore/reform combined was still less than burnham


15 posted on 06/24/2026 5:54:38 PM PDT by joshua c (collectivism has many names but the result is the same; the state is primary, the citizen is a slave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Exactly. Johnson was a catastrophe. He was supposed to be against opening the borders to the hordes. Instead, he opened the floodgates.


16 posted on 06/24/2026 7:28:46 PM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson