Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran Now Walking Back and Repackaging One of Their Demands, Sounding Like Democrats
Red State ^ | 05/25/2026 | Nick Arama

Posted on 05/25/2026 8:34:00 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

The U.S. and Iran are reportedly in the process of working out a deal to end hostilities and reopen the Strait of Hormuz.

President Donald Trump assured people he wasn't going to make the mistakes of the Obama Iran deal, and has placed focus on getting the highly enriched uranium to deter the nuclear threat. In fact, he was even pursuing a broader peace across the region, asking other countries like Saudi Arabia to sign on to the Abraham Accords once the Iran deal is finalized.

This also may have pushed Iran to try to clean up its language when it comes to its idea of charging tolls for transiting the Strait of Hormuz. So the regime just came up with a slick move that sounds like a move Democrats would make. 

Vessels crossing the Strait of Hormuz will need to pay fees for “navigational services,” Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei said Monday.

Such payments for transiting the waterway were not tolls, he said at a press briefing.

“The services that are provided, navigational services, in addition to the measures necessary to protect the environment of the Strait of Hormuz, the Persian Gulf, and the Sea of Oman, require the collection of certain fees,” Baghaei said, adding that Tehran was “not seeking to collect tolls.”

Oh, so they'll scream "environmental fees" like Democrats to get money, leaving out that the only environmental problem is the Iranian regime stopping and attacking ships. Oh, and maybe the regime is possibly releasing oil into the Persian Gulf because they've run out of storage capacity. 

They're desperate for money with how much they've been crushed, and they want to establish, officially, that they have control over the Strait.

The New York Times is reporting they're in talks with Oman about it. The Strait involves the territorial waters of Iran and Oman.

Bottom line, though, it doesn't matter what you call it; it's still basically trying to hold people up.

Under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), all ships have the right to unfettered passage, and states cannot charge for it or impede it, even if it is in their territorial waters. While Iran is not a signatory to UNCLOS, Oman is, and Iran still can't do it even if they haven't signed it. Oman has already said they would not charge tolls because they'd agreed to UNCLOS, so it remains to be seen if that report from the NY Times is correct. The allure of the money might attract Oman, but it would not make their neighbors happy with them.

Meanwhile, the U.S. and many other nations have spoken out previously against any efforts to charge. And they can't have Iran have control over it, as this episode with their bad behavior has demonstrated. But it's so typical of Iran when they realized they had to walk back tolls, to try to repackage it into something more legally palatable.

But that's not going to fly either.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Iran; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: blockade; hormuz; iran

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 05/25/2026 8:34:01 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Yeah, that sounds like paying protection money to the mob.

CC


2 posted on 05/25/2026 8:44:30 PM PDT by Celtic Conservative (Heghlu'meH QaQ jajvam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Like I said last week, Iran hasn’t honored one agreement since 1977. No reason to think they would start now. Time to tighten the noose.


3 posted on 05/25/2026 8:47:26 PM PDT by econjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Welcome to negotiating with Persians. They will stretch out the talks......
They are well aware restarting the war would be a nightmare for both sides


4 posted on 05/25/2026 8:48:33 PM PDT by birg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

They’re stalling until November because they know that the war is unpopular and the Midterms are coming up.


5 posted on 05/25/2026 8:49:11 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The fact that the Iranians think they have the right to charge for passage through the Straits --- whether they call them "fees" or "tolls" or "bribes" or "tribute", or any other words --- tells me they think they control (own) the Straits.

This is unacceptable.

6 posted on 05/25/2026 8:50:29 PM PDT by ZOOKER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Roberts: "Clarence - they are not tolls, they are navigational services."



7 posted on 05/25/2026 8:54:45 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Are there not fees and charges for going through the Panama Canal?

Iran is not going to give it all that anymore than they’re going to give in and give the United States or anyone else their nuclear material.


8 posted on 05/25/2026 8:57:34 PM PDT by Captain Peter Blood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: econjack

I think you mean 1979. The shah was in power in 1977.


9 posted on 05/25/2026 8:58:28 PM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Captain Peter Blood; MinorityRepublican; SeekAndFind; birg; econjack

At its narrowest point, all of Hormuz (BTW, it’s spelled “whore - mose”) falls either in Omani or Iranian waters.

However, under the the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), Hormuz is considered an international strait, and ships generally have a right of “transit passage” through it.

Under UNCLOS, Iran may charge a fee for optional services, but cannot make passage conditioned on payment of the fee - the key here is: optional. But I think Iran can charge reasonable environmental (e.g. dredging) fees.

So, under UNCLOS, Hormuz is quite different from Panama or Suez.

But here is the catch: Iran never signed UNCLOS.

But really, negotiating against Persians is really, really tough. I’m an Iranian-American attorney, and I hate negotiating against Iranians.

And the rulers of Iran are especially slimey. Imagine the sleaziest used car salesman you can think of. Now imagine a drug addict who will say anything - lie, threaten, beg, or compliment - to get drug money. Now imagine a timeshare salesman. Now think of a divorce lawyer who got disbarred because of unethical behavior. Now think of the slick conman who does 3-card monte in touristy locations to fleece out-of-towners. Now think of some guy in a basement running the Nigerian Prince scam.

Now mix them up. That is the typical negotiator representing the rulers of Iran.


10 posted on 05/25/2026 9:35:32 PM PDT by Time_Has_Come (I'm a proud Islamophobe, and for very good reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Just boob their asses already they don’t want a deal they only understood violence


11 posted on 05/25/2026 9:46:32 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

They are not terrified of getting boobed. LOL


12 posted on 05/25/2026 10:57:54 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ZOOKER

21st century Barbary Pirates


13 posted on 05/26/2026 12:58:57 AM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), all ships have the right to unfettered passage

Hmm, globalists not enforcing their rules based order...


14 posted on 05/26/2026 4:38:52 AM PDT by Steven Tyler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

What does Egypt charge to transit the Suez canal?


15 posted on 05/26/2026 4:42:05 AM PDT by Steven Tyler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I am getting way past tired of this koranimal waffling. PDJT should try to mafia approach ... “here is the treaty. Either you signature or your brains will be on that document very soon”


16 posted on 05/26/2026 5:04:28 AM PDT by ByteMercenary (Election 2020 was stolen by mail-in voting. Mail-in voting and RCV counting should be abolished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoCal Pubbie

Sorry...fat fingers.


17 posted on 05/26/2026 5:26:42 AM PDT by econjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; BraveMan; cardinal4; ...

18 posted on 05/26/2026 5:29:45 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (TDS -- it's not just for DNC shills anymore -- oh, wait, yeah it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Steven Tyler

I believe canals are different because they have to be operated.


19 posted on 05/26/2026 5:48:32 AM PDT by AppyPappy (They don't call you a Nazi because they think you are one. They do it to justify violence. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv; All

Or the pre emotive strikes are working...


20 posted on 05/26/2026 6:32:38 AM PDT by Milagros
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson