Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Navy review puts future of highest-tech US aircraft carriers in question
AP News ^ | April 21, 2026 | KONSTANTIN TOROPIN

Posted on 04/24/2026 6:55:05 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican

The U.S. Navy is reviewing the design and costs of one of its most high-tech and expensive warships — the Ford-class aircraft carrier — and the service’s top boss is not ruling out canceling future versions of its design.

Navy Secretary John Phelan told reporters Tuesday that the review, which should be complete next month, was “a prudent and practical” move aimed at examining “the costs of the designs and the systems to make sure that they make sense and they have all the systems and requirements that we want going forward.”

The review of the design comes after years of criticism from President Donald Trump, who has taken issue with some of the technology on this type of aircraft carrier, including its magnetic catapults, which he claimed “didn’t work” during remarks in the Oval Office last year.

When Phelan was asked if the review could lead to the cancellation of future Ford-class aircraft carriers, he told reporters only that “it’s too early to say, but we will have carriers.”

The USS Gerald R. Ford has been on a record-setting deployment of more than 300 days — since June 2025 — that has seen the world’s largest aircraft carrier participate in two key military actions by the Trump administration: the capture of Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro and the war against Iran.

Navy budget documents made public Tuesday did not list Ford-class aircraft carriers among the ships that the Navy planned to buy. The documents instead simply said “aircraft carrier.” Meanwhile, other ships — such as the Columbia-class submarines and Arleigh Burke-class destroyers — were described by class name.

(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aircraftcarriers; associatedpress; fordclass; konstantintoropin; leftistsource; russiansource

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

1 posted on 04/24/2026 6:55:05 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

The Ford Class aircraft carrier is not the ship we need going forward.


2 posted on 04/24/2026 6:59:58 PM PDT by rdcbn1 (..when poets buy guns, tourist season is over................Walter R. Mead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

EMALS has been a balky money pit. Maybe back to steam catapults.


3 posted on 04/24/2026 7:14:26 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
Battleships at the bottom of the Oahu pond due to aircraft carriers.

Aircraft carriers at the bottom of the ocean due to . . . ???

Drones?

4 posted on 04/24/2026 7:26:31 PM PDT by imardmd1 (To learn is to live; the joy of living: to teach. Fiat Lux! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: imardmd1

Montana Class BBs could force the Strait of Hormuz.


5 posted on 04/24/2026 7:28:13 PM PDT by Jim Noble (Assez de mensonges et des phrases)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Several small carriers have advantages over a single supercarrier for the same cost. Design drones to fit the ship, instead of designing a ship around 20th century war fighting technology.

Also a fan of some conventional subs to supplement the big boats.


6 posted on 04/24/2026 7:31:58 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

My understanding is that the ship is very SUSTAINABLE, meaning it has a very small impact on the environment.

Hard to see a anything more important than that.


7 posted on 04/24/2026 7:36:32 PM PDT by BobL (Trusting one's doctor is the #1 health mistake one can make.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

The fewer transformations of energy the greater the efficiency.
Steam cats work.


8 posted on 04/24/2026 7:38:25 PM PDT by sasquatch (Do NOT forget Ashli Babbit! c/o piytar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

There are a half dozen or so display battleships that could be modernized and do the job.


9 posted on 04/24/2026 7:42:25 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sasquatch

And the navy sure knows how to operate and maintain those steam catapults.


10 posted on 04/24/2026 7:45:50 PM PDT by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: imardmd1

Lint fire or bad toilets.


11 posted on 04/24/2026 7:47:34 PM PDT by moviefan8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

I guess until we can find another method to project our power and have the capability to mass planes/drones outside the confines of the U.S., I think we’re stuck with aircraft carriers.


12 posted on 04/24/2026 7:51:46 PM PDT by Doc91678 (Doc91678)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Sorry but in the era of the silicon chip, virtually all naval surface combatants are obsolete. In order to prove that concept wrong, the US Navy would have to be engaged with a technologically sophisticated opponent. May that day never come.


13 posted on 04/24/2026 8:05:27 PM PDT by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: imardmd1

We have a winner!


14 posted on 04/24/2026 8:05:36 PM PDT by cqnc (sic transit gloria mundi...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PAR35
Also a fan of some conventional subs to supplement the big boats.

Diesel subs? We’re not a poor country. That’s what a poor country has to try and defend its coast. Our subs operate on the other side of the world.

15 posted on 04/24/2026 8:09:56 PM PDT by Gunslingr3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Doc91678

Correct. The next generation platforms to enable projection of force globally are needed.

I believe those platforms are already in the works, designed to be rapidly constructed, and “autonomous”.

The weapons of war will adapt to the threat.


16 posted on 04/24/2026 8:15:43 PM PDT by dadgum (Fight to WIN or do not fight at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

I can say with some certainty that Phelan won’t be cancelling anything.


17 posted on 04/24/2026 8:16:53 PM PDT by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Shift to drone carriers IMHO and put the $$ saved elsewhere


18 posted on 04/24/2026 8:20:43 PM PDT by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

Damn straight! (or strait, if you prefer! lol)


19 posted on 04/24/2026 8:48:45 PM PDT by BB62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

I agree. While EMALS is great in theory, steam is not dependant on electronics.


20 posted on 04/24/2026 9:17:41 PM PDT by ro_dreaming (Who knew "Idiocracy", "1984", "Enemy of the State", and "Person of Interest" would be non-fiction?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson