Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 04/15/2026 5:04:32 PM PDT by delta7
1: Introduction
Purpose of the guide 1.1 The Bank of England (the Bank), as the UK’s resolution authority, is responsible for taking action to manage the failure of certain financial institutions, including UK headquartered banking groups and UK-incorporated banks and building societies (together, firms),footnote [1] a process known as ‘resolution’. Resolution allows the shareholders and unsecured creditors of failed firms to be fully exposed to losses, while ensuring the critical functions of the firm can continue and helping to preserve financial stability. Resolution reduces risks to depositors, the financial system, and public funds that could arise due to the failure of a firm. By ensuring losses will fall on a failed firm’s investors, rather than depositors or taxpayers, resolution can both reduce the risk of firm failures by supporting market discipline and limit the impact of failure when it does occur.
1.2 Bail-in is one of the stabilisation tools available to the Bank as resolution authority under the Banking Act 2009 (the Banking Act).footnote [2] Bail-in ensures investors, rather than public funds, bear losses. Bail-in enables the Bank to impose losses on shareholders and to write down or convert into equity the value of the claims of certain unsecured creditors, so that the failed firm can be recapitalised and continue to operate thereby ensuring the continuity of critical functions pending a reorganisation of the business that addresses the causes of failure. The exposure of shareholders and creditors to losses in resolution should respect the order in which they would have received distributions in an insolvency of the firm,footnote [3] and leave them no worse off than they would have been if the firm had been placed into an insolvency process. This is a key protection for investors in firms and known as the ‘no creditor worse off’ safeguard.footnote [4] The Bank considers that for the largest, systemically important firms – including UK global systemically important banks (G-SIBs) and domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs) – the use of a bail-in resolution strategy is likely to be the way in which the special resolution objectives would best be met in the event of the failure of the firm. Firms which have been set a bail-in preferred resolution strategy are required to hold additional loss absorbing resources.
1.3 The purpose of this document is to provide practical information on how the Bank might execute a bail-in resolution, and in particular the operational processes and arrangements that may be involved in this. This document is technical in nature and is likely to be of particular interest to those who may be directly affected by or involved in a bail-in. This includes firms for which bail-in is the preferred resolution strategy; shareholders and holders of eligible liabilities which may be subject to bail-in and custodians acting on their behalf; other creditors of such firms; financial market infrastructures and other market participants that may be involved in the execution of a bail-in; and others who would have an interest in resolution actions, such as host authorities of UK banking groups subject to bail-in. The document also provides practical information which may be relevant where the Bank executes a transfer of a failed firm to a bridge bank or private sector purchaser. This includes, for example, the steps necessary to write down regulatory capital instruments. Further information on the operational execution of a transfer can be found in the Operational guide to transfer resolution...
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
Already written into law, coming to a bank near you?
“But we would never do that in the United States, right? Try this headline:
“Citigroup Says Debt Beats Peers in Advance of ‘Bail-In’ Rule.”
In principle, depositors are the most senior creditors in a bank. However, that was changed in the 2005 bankruptcy law, which made derivatives liabilities most senior.
In other words, derivatives liabilities get paid before all other creditors — certainly before non-crony creditors like depositors. Considering the extreme levels of derivatives liabilities that many large banks have, and the opportunity to stuff any bank with derivatives liabilities in the last moment, other creditors could easily find there is nothing left for them at all.”
Cyprus was the early NWO testing grounds. They’ve moved on to Australia and New Zealand now.
The endgame ultimately is to ‘bail in’ everyone into their Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDCs) and tokenize everything, including the water and air we breathe onto the blockchain. The bankers will then own and control everything going forward forever with a coming mandatory Digital ID, Social Credit Score, VAX ID and global CBDC.
“Ask the depositors how it worked out in Cyprus crisis.”
Yeah, Alex has talked about it many times. I think the way it worked is that if you had deposits in excess of the insurance limits ($100,000 Euros now, but only $20,000 Euros back then, in 2008)...the government came in and SWIPED it.
Pretty damn nasty.
But when Silicon Valley Bank collapsed, the government (under Biden’s Girls) simply bailed them out, completely, even though their deposits averaged something like $100M each (the bank was only for the uber-rich). Seems their campaign contributions more than paid off.
But when Silicon Valley Bank collapsed, the government (under Biden’s Girls) simply bailed them out,
Never trust delta7.
He said load up the truck when silver was 121.
Last year when JPM was long on silver he said that they were short and it would cause their downfall.
He predicted that a US civil war would start last year with the US breaking up into four new countries in 2026.
He is just trolling for suckers dumb enough to send their credit card numbers.
He was banned for shilling for an ex-con convicted scammer.
“Ask the depositors how it worked out in Cyprus crisis.”
And the major shareholder of their Number One Bank was a Russian oligarch.
You are funny.
“unsecured creditors of failed firms”
Otherwise known as depositors.
Its called a haircut. One day you have $100,000 in your account and next day $66,000.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.