Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why the US Navy Won’t Clear the Mines Even Though It Can - 18 minutes youtube
Y-Tube ^ | 3-19 | - Navy Decoded -213,000 views

Posted on 03/19/2026 7:15:37 PM PDT by dennisw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2NNZ2u2WDD0&t=883s

SUMMARY >>>

2. Cost asymmetry ****************

Mine: ~$1,500

Destroyer: ~$2 billion

Ratio: 1 : 1.3 million

This makes mines one of the most cost-effective weapons ever created.

3. Geography of the Strait of Hormuz ************

Only a 6-mile-wide shipping corridor actually needs to be mined.

Iran doesn’t need to block the whole strait—just the key lanes.

4. Psychological & economic impact ************

Mines act as an “insurance weapon”:

One explosion → insurers withdraw coverage

Tankers stop entering the region

Trade halts without further attacks

Critical insight: ************* The goal isn’t to destroy ships—it’s to trigger fear and shut down commerce.

Types of mines discussed: ***************

Contact mines

Explode when physically touched

Influence mines

Triggered by:

Magnetic field

Sound (propellers)

Pressure changes

Can selectively target large ships

Rising mines (EM-52)

Launch upward like rockets

Nearly impossible to defend against

Main takeaway: **************** Naval mines combine stealth, low cost, and strategic disruption, making them nearly “perfect” weapons.

Chapter 3: The U.S. Navy’s High-Tech Solution **********

Traditionally, mine clearing is extremely dangerous:

Divers manually locate and destroy mines

Ships operate inside active minefields

The U.S. Navy created a fully unmanned, multi-system approach to eliminate this risk.

The Four-System Strategy: **************** 1. Laser Detection (ALMDS)

Mounted on helicopters

Uses laser scanning (LiDAR) to map near-surface mines

Works like a “CT scan of the ocean”

2. Unmanned Sonar Boats (CUSV + AQS-20C) ***************

Robot boats tow sonar systems

Detect mines on the seafloor

Operate for long durations without human risk

3. Decoy System (Unmanned Influence Sweep)

Simulates a large ship’s:

Magnetic signature

Noise

Pressure

Tricks mines into detonating themselves

4. Precision Kill Drone (Archerfish)

Small underwater drone

Identifies and destroys individual mines with shaped charges

Key concept: ****************** A complete mine-clearing chain:

Detect

Scan

Trigger

Destroy

All done without putting sailors in the water.

Chapter 4: Why the Mines Haven’t Been Cleared Yet ****************

Despite having the technology, the Navy hasn’t cleared the mines yet. This is explained through three strategic variables:

1. Stop new mines from being deployed

Clearing mines while new ones are being laid is pointless.

Military operations have:

Destroyed mine-laying ships

Hit production facilities

Eliminated stockpiles

Result: The “faucet” is turned off—no new mines are coming.

2. Protection for mine-clearing forces ****************

Mine-clearing ships are vulnerable:

Slow and focused on one task

Easy targets for:

Missiles

Fast attack boats

Submarines

They require a protective military “bubble”, including:

Air cover (fighter jets)

Naval escorts

Marine forces

This protection is being assembled (e.g., amphibious assault ships with aircraft).

3. Economic pressure on Iran **************

The mines hurt Iran too:

Iran depends on the same shipping route for oil exports

Insurance costs stop tankers from entering

Oil exports collapse

Result: The mines create a self-inflicted economic blockade. ***********

Strategic conclusion

The Navy is waiting for:

Mine production stopped ✔️

Full protection in place (incoming)

Maximum economic pressure on Iran

Only then will clearing begin.

Chapter 5: Final Message & Strategic Insight ************

The story concludes by reinforcing the central themes:

Naval mines are:

Cheap

Old

Extremely effective

A single low-cost weapon can disrupt:

Global trade

Energy markets

Military operations

The U.S. response: ******************

Replace human risk with automation

Use layered, unmanned systems

Ultimate takeaway

This isn’t just about weapons—it’s about strategy and timing:

The Navy isn’t acting immediately because waiting creates advantage.

Mines only work once.

If no replacements exist, clearing them becomes permanent victory.

Big Picture Summary ************

This content argues that: ****************

Naval mines are one of the most powerful asymmetric weapons ever created.

They can shut down critical global infrastructure (like oil routes) with minimal cost.

The U.S. has developed advanced systems to counter them—but chooses when to act strategically, not immediately. ***************

Warfare here is not just physical—it’s economic, psychological, and logistical.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Iran; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: concerntroll; concerntrolling; fakenews; huh; iran; mines; navy; tds; tldr; whatisthisidonteven

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 03/19/2026 7:15:37 PM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dennisw

Good post. Thank you.


2 posted on 03/19/2026 7:23:06 PM PDT by JusPasenThru (They were the FA of times, they were the FO of times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

Thx for posting. Informative.


3 posted on 03/19/2026 7:31:33 PM PDT by TexasKamaAina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JusPasenThru

Put them on the bottom of the Taiwan Strait and all around the island. Set a trap for the Chicoms. Once the shooting starts their ships will be sitting ducks but there will be a whole lot of them.Their air force would be the most effective weapon but they can’t land. I wonder what the Taiwanese are doing on their own behalf.


4 posted on 03/19/2026 7:36:46 PM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (Curt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

Thanks for a Great Post: much to learn on this topic.
Dennis W, really like your bio too !!


5 posted on 03/19/2026 7:37:00 PM PDT by InkStone (ONLY returning to Faith in God, thru Jesus Yeshua, will save America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

I just dont get how the mine threat goes from none to credible. What determines if the threat is credible? We dont just take Irans word for it and go “Oh, theres mines. Really? Ok, thanks for letting us know.” There has to be some validation to say “yup, there they are!” So if we know there are mines then we know where they are. Why not just depth charge the hell out of the whole area?


6 posted on 03/19/2026 7:46:56 PM PDT by know.your.why
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Thanks for posting. However, maybe format it for reading. As
it stands it's like a horrible power point. It's not prose.

7 posted on 03/19/2026 8:07:45 PM PDT by Governor Dinwiddie ( O give thanks unto the Lord, for He is gracious, and his mercy endures forever. — Psalm 106)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: know.your.why

I don’t know how Iran can lay any mines in the Hormuz Strait. They are allowing Chinese, Indian and other BRICS allies to sail their tankers through the Strait. Mines don’t know what flag a ship is sailing under.

Mines on the top just bob around until a ship hits them. The mines on the bottom have sensors that a ship is above and release a mine that seeks that ship but it doesn’t know one ship from another.

I don’t think the IRGC wants to sink a ChiCom or Indian tanker.


8 posted on 03/19/2026 8:41:13 PM PDT by TigersEye (Are the RINOs helping the Democrats wage their color revolution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

Thanks for the summary. I saw this yousetube but didn’t want to watch thinking it just another sensational bit of junk.

Far too much junk on yousetube these days. Hard to sort senseless and AI junk from useful.


9 posted on 03/19/2026 8:47:23 PM PDT by Sequoyah101 (Opinions and belly buttons, everybody has one and they get to show them if they want to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Maybe we should ‘cause’ an accident. Wouldn’t want a lot of oil to spill.


10 posted on 03/19/2026 8:47:51 PM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (Curt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET
The IRGC has hit about four tankers with, presumably, surface-to-surface missiles.
I haven't heard a word about any oil spills from that.

Maybe they were coming in empty.

11 posted on 03/19/2026 8:53:09 PM PDT by TigersEye (Are the RINOs helping the Democrats wage their color revolution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Perhaps a Chinese ship could broadcast a signal that turns off a mine. Would that give up the mine’s location? Could that signal be intercepted and duplicated? Or could it be time dependent, so the interceptor can’t use it?

Would need the signal to work on all the mines, all the time. Not sure Chinese captains and seamen would want to sail.

Dolphins might be able to clear mines. Not sure they’d want the risk. Maybe lifetime uranium, I mean fish, would do it.


12 posted on 03/19/2026 9:15:33 PM PDT by Tymesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

I have not seen any confirmation that the Iranians have mined the shipping lanes. In any event two can play that game. Mine Kharg Island and Iran won’t be exporting any oil and their economy collapses if it hasn’t already and we don’t have to blow the facilities up. Inshore mining of the ports and coastal waters can also put an end to the small boat threat.


13 posted on 03/19/2026 10:49:05 PM PDT by your other brother
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: your other brother

CentCom has said that they have no evidence that the IRGC has mined the Strait. If anyone would know!
Plus no ships have been hit by mines.

We don’t want to collapse the Iranian economy completely. And by “we” I mean Trump specifically. Iran is going to need that oil to rebuild once they finish off the regime. And they’ll be charging China, India and other BRICS countries the going price not $15 a barrel cheaper. And, at least for now, the going price in Asia is $150 bbl.

Here in the west it’s $100 bbl FWIW. :D


14 posted on 03/19/2026 11:11:24 PM PDT by TigersEye (Are the RINOs helping the Democrats wage their color revolution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

It should not be too hard to produce a mine that would shut down when when pinged by a friendly ship that knows the right frequency or code.


15 posted on 03/20/2026 3:09:03 AM PDT by Paperpusher (Gal 5:15 But if ye bite and devour one another, take heed that ye be not consumed one of another.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

Wooden boats will not set off magnetically detonated mines. They are effective as minesweeping hunter-killers.


16 posted on 03/20/2026 3:10:52 AM PDT by jonrick46 (Leftniks chase illusions of motherships at the end of the pier.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Governor Dinwiddie

Why don’t you reformat it yourself.


17 posted on 03/20/2026 3:26:03 AM PDT by Palio di Siena (Kralik…..you get the wallet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Governor Dinwiddie; Palio di Siena

Proper formatting is difficult when you copy n paste from chatGPT. But I look into a better way. Screen shots maybe.


18 posted on 03/20/2026 3:46:33 AM PDT by dennisw (Qatarlson the Insufferable blowhard = There is no limit to human stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

Were you in the Navy?

I started reading then I saw the assumption that destroyers are minesweepers. Fail


19 posted on 03/20/2026 3:49:09 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn... )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

The U.S. Bombers youTube channel makes the same point, about cost effectiveness. The U.S. mining Japanese ports was extremely cost effect, and with very low risk to the bombers sowing them. Japan was starving because of loss of merchant shipping, partially to mines.

Post war, the U.S. made great efforts to clear the mines but still lost merchant ships - with loss of life - to mines we had sown.

In one piece of supreme irony, German shore batteries did not fire on highly vulnerable (mostly British) mine sweeping operations on June 5th, 1944 because they thought they were decoys, setting the batteries up for attack by battleships’ and cruisers’ counterbattery fire. Apparently similar tactics had been deployed previously.


20 posted on 03/20/2026 4:30:39 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets ( Thorough planning and careful preparation is no substitute for wishful thinking. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson