Posted on 01/30/2026 8:31:34 PM PST by SeekAndFind
About a month late, presumably due to last fall's government shutdown, the Census Bureau has released its estimates of the populations of the 50 states and the District of Columbia for July 1, 2025.
It provides an interesting picture of what the country is, and is becoming, halfway through the decade of the 2020s and one-quarter of the way through (have we really gotten this far?) the 21st century. It also provides some political dynamite, all the more explosive because of Census Bureau statisticians' deserved reputation for apolitical rigor and willingness to admit mistakes, as it did on the COVID-19-plagued 2020 Census.
The headline story is the sharp rise and sharp fall in immigration. The notion that immigration exploded sharply during the Biden administration and contracted sharply during the second Trump administration is not political propaganda.
After the expiration of most COVID-19 restrictions, immigration rose to 1.8 million in 2021-22, 2.6 million in 2022-23, and 3.2 million in 2023-24.
The snapback to 1.9 million in 2024-25 reflects changes in both outgoing and incoming administrations. With the election looming, the Biden administration in early 2024 discovered that current legislation let it restrict immigration in ways it had claimed it didn't before, and under the same legislation, the Trump administration immediately stopped almost all illegal border crossings. Government policy can make a difference.
Taking that into account, the Census Bureau estimates immigration will fall well below 500,000 in 2025-26. That's comparable to the sharp falloff of immigration during the financial and economic crises of 2007-08.
That means the nation's total population increase is sharply down, especially in the states centered on the nation's four largest metropolitan areas, which either grew just barely (New York and Illinois) or lost population (California). Meanwhile, every state in the Midwest gained population, and five states grew above the national rate.
Even more striking, 44 percent of the nation's population gains in 2020-25 came in just the two states of Texas and Florida. When you add in North Carolina, Georgia, Arizona, South Carolina -- with the nation's higher percentage growth in 2024-25 -- and Tennessee, you have 70% of the total national popular gain, all in states carried by Donald Trump in 2024.
Projecting 2020-25 or 2024-25 patterns ahead of the 2030 Census and the reapportionment of U.S. House seats among the states that automatically follows results in a sharp change of political balance. Two different projections have California losing four House seats and Texas gaining four, leaving California with 48, only marginally larger than Texas's 42.
One has Florida gaining four and New York and Illinois losing two each, while the other has Florida gaining two and New York and Florida losing one each, with the same net partisan effect. There is agreement that five more or less Republican states will gain one seat each (Georgia, North Carolina, Arizona, Utah, Idaho) and that five more or less Democratic states will lose one each -- Rhode Island, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Oregon.
Apply either set of projections to the 2024 presidential election totals, and Trump gains either nine or 11 electoral votes -- and wins even if he loses his three closest states, Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania. The blue wall has become a purple flowerbed.
That doesn't mean Democrats will be frozen out of the White House. Changes in opinion of a magnitude often experienced can render the 2024 numbers obsolete. But one can see difficulties, even in 2028, if Democrats nominate one of the two California politicians, Gavin Newsom or Kamala Harris, who top their polls. Will the nation be well served by policies that have prompted more people to leave than to head to a state with California's beautiful scenery and comfortable climate?
It's harder to be sure whether the 2030 Census will give Republicans a boost in Congress. The current ructions over mid-decade redistricting make prediction perilous. An intermediate court has blocked Virginia Democrats from gerrymandering, and a trial judge has ruled that the Voting Rights Act requires linking a Staten Island-dominated district to Manhattan rather than Brooklyn.
But almost certainly any political redistricting would rather be a Republican adding multiple districts in Texas and Florida than a Democrat required to eliminate some of his party's incumbents in California, New York or Illinois. And heavily Democratic central cities will no longer be entitled to as much representation from masses of illegal immigrants protected from deportation but counted by census takers.
A final caveat. Issues aren't static, politicians aren't around forever (even if Trump Derangement Syndrome sufferers fear that), and voters move around amid changes in the political landscape. The Trump era has been full of surprises -- who thought he'd win in 2024 because of increased Latino support? -- and the 2030s, when Trump won't be president or running for president, will have their surprises for us too.
Michael Barone is a senior political analyst for the Washington Examiner, resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and longtime co-author of The Almanac of American Politics. His new book, "Mental Maps of the Founders: How Geographic Imagination Guided America's Revolutionary Leaders," is now available.
Then, add in redistricting for more seat pick ups.
Things are flowing our way. We MUST win in 2028, they are the ones in trouble and they know it.
And, if Trump can get it passed that illegals are not counted.
That’s what the Dems are really panicking about. It’s not votes, per se.
It’s always been about apportionment.
L
>who thought he’d win in 2024 because of increased Latino support?
We did (not just FR, all the MAGA people) silly.
We know that the people who either a) directly experience narco-terrorism and narco-socialist conglomerates or b) talk to the communities that have both experienced and really hate the invasion of illegals.
That’s why 2025-2026 is full of protests by AWFLs and not the theoretically impacted “POC” groups. Take a look at the freaking-out people waving their signs.
I don’t think this is properly catching the truth.
People are moving to Florida and Texas. These people are often fleeing Democrat states.
They leave behind apartments and homes that someone else rents and buys. These are preferentially illegals and immigrants that aren’t all there, mentally.
The net of it is that Democrat states still have gotten a disproportionate amount of some sort of immigrant, while Texas and Florida get a disproportion of legal citizens fleeing craziness.
So, no, I do not believe Florida or Texas are getting a high proportion of the new illegal and legal immigrants. They are just getting sane people fleeing states that have immigrant-friendly structures, at the expense of local legal citizens.
It all hinges on whether we reduce election fraud.
Michael Barone is still around? Bless him!
“Things are flowing our way. We MUST win in 2028, they are the ones in trouble and they know it.”
2026 too!!! We must go out in force and vote during the midterms!!! Trump has worked hard. The least we can do is vote!!!
Here, here!
That would completely change the electoral map.
Yes, this is VERY important!
Illegals give Dems like a dozen of Congressmen and comparable number of electoral votes!
The next census should do the normal head count but it also *MUST* include a count of USA citizens. This is the number that will be used to allocate congressional reps.
Drop a line to your congress-critter TODAY !!
Use snail-mail as most electronic communication is ignored or deleted if the your message is not what they want to hear. A posted letter will usually get a written response, probably a boilerplate form letter saying that they will give your opinion the consideration that they feel it is worth.
Barone doesn’t mention if self deportation is factored in. He groups things together making it sound like the Census Bureau is only counting migration between certain states.
EC
Which is why the FBI raid on the Fulton County elections warehouse makes us hopeful and energized.
I like Barone. He’s not a flamethrower and we learn reading his articles when we get tired of the others.
Or really landowners...That would kill RINOs and Democrats...
“Michael Barone is still around?”
That was my thought, too. He’s done great work forever.
By that I mean, a constitutional amendment mandating that all redistricting would be accomplished by an algorithm that drew lines within a state to provide the calculated or iterated LOWEST length of boundaries between congressional (or state delegate/senate) districts.
No impact of one party or the other, or incumbents, protecting their seats. I have no confidence in "non-partisan" commissions. There are more actual unicorns and leprechauns than 'non-partisan' commissioners.
What say you all?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.