Posted on 01/22/2026 12:09:19 PM PST by Twotone
Fake Nobel Winner found "responsible" in $9M lie to DC jury.
snip
BREAKING: The Superior Court in DC just NUKED disgraced climate scientist Michael Mann AGAIN.
Last year, Mann was sanctioned for "knowingly feeding the jury false data" in a manner of misconduct that was "extraordinary in its scope, extent, and intent."
Today, the court doubled... pic.twitter.com/fQff5YsM7V — Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) January 22, 2026
Here are some highlights from today's decision (my emphasis in bold):
The Court has considered Dr. Mann's request for reconsideration. For the reasons Mr. Simberg and Mr. Steyn articulated orally during in-court arguments and presented in their pleadings, and as reasoned in the Court's March 12, 2025 Order, the Court will deny the request....
The fact remains that Dr. Mann throughout this litigation complained that he suffered lost grant funding directly stemming from the defamatory statements of Messrs. Simberg and Steyn, while providing very little in the way of specifics about the dollar amounts of his losses directly attributable to the statements (such as corroborating testimony from percipient witnesses), all while promising to illuminate the Court at trial. At trial, Dr. Mann elected through his attorneys to present to the jury a blown-up demonstrative, without redaction or explanation, a demonstrative intentionally prepared for its use at trial, which included a budget (loss) amount of $9,713,924.00, when the correct amount, previously corrected during a third round of discovery, was $112,000.
Dr. Mann and his attorneys explain that there was no harm in publishing the demonstrative to the jury because Defendants and the Court knew well that the $9.7 million was later corrected during discovery, while ignoring the fact that the trial's factfinders, the jury, were never made privy to the discovery corrections through Dr. Mann's in-court testimony...
(Excerpt) Read more at steynonline.com ...
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
If he would lie to a judge and jury while under oath, is there any doubt that he would lie to the readers of his “research” and tortured “data”?
The whole global warming scam started by bureaucrats getting larger budgets for promoting the global warming scam.
“If he would lie to a judge and jury while under oath, is there any doubt that he would lie to the readers of his “research” and tortured “data”?”
A liars gotta lie.
This is very good news, except that apparently other appeals are ongoing. Mark Steyn has been put through the wringer by this charlatan—over nothing but a disgusting money grab by Mann.
UPenn should fire him. Should have already done.
Mann is such a sleaze.
There should’ve been a judgement that this case was a fraud from the beginning, with full restitution to Mark & others of what they spent defending themselves. Mann’s lawyers have already threatened to go after Steyn’s estate, should he die. These people are plain, flat evil & should be punished.
>>The court also ordered Mann to pay $28k to the defendants (Mark and Rand Simberg) as part of its sanction.
He tried to extort $9.7 million through perjury, he should have to pay his victims (Steyn and Simberg) $9.7 million.
He won’t go away! Keep flushing!
Maybe, Dr. Mann should be liable for Trillions of dollars wasted to address the Global Warming hoax, he started by his fraudulent research.
Our legal system’s main goal is not justice; but to enrich lawyers.
Go sit on a hockey stick, Mann.
Whenever a person uses a “hockey stick” forecast, it’s ALWAYS bullshit. No exceptions.
Mann is the Jack Smith of “science”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.