Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Donald Trump's new city-destroying nuclear missile 'is spotted for the first time' as planespotter photographs it on hush-hush test flight
UK Daily Mail ^ | 11/08/2025 | SHANNON MCGUIGAN

Posted on 11/08/2025 11:50:20 AM PST by DFG

US President Donald Trump's 'secret' city-destroying nuclear weapon appears to have been pictured for the first time by a planespotter during an alleged test flight.

Californian plane enthusiast Ian Recchio spotted the flying object while attempting to picture military aircrafts while overlooking the Owen Valley.

Now, military experts believe it could be the AGM-181 LRSO, the US Air Force's (USAF) next-generation stealth nuclear cruise missile.

The missile is set to replace the Cold War-era AGM-86B and will be carried by both the forthcoming £585m B-21 Raider and upgraded B-52 bombers.

It is thought the weapon will have an adjustable nuclear yield between 5-150 kilotons, allowing uses ranging from tactical effect to destroying cities.

A yield of 150 kilotons is a blast ten times more powerful than the bomb dropped on Hiroshima in August 1945.

And if experts are correct, it is the first time the deadly missile has ever been pictured over California.

Photographer Mr Recchio told The Aviationist: 'We heard Torch52 on the scanner and looked up just in time to catch it climbing to about 5,000 feet.

'When we reviewed the photos, the ordnance looked unlike anything we’d seen before.'

The bomber carried classic orange test markings and two unidentified weapons that bear a resemblance to public renderings of the AGM-181A, the publication said.

Officials have confirmed the nuclear warhead has been tested several times, and is scheduled to be ready for service by 2030.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: cruisemissile; dailymail; enemieslist; enemyjournalist; handgrenades; horseshoes; ianrecchio; shannonmcguigan; stealth
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Use it on Sacramento

1 posted on 11/08/2025 11:50:20 AM PST by DFG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DFG

Well, if we try using it on Russian cities, Russia will turn around and use their nukes on our cities.

Hmmm...come to think of it...never mind.


2 posted on 11/08/2025 11:52:43 AM PST by BobL (Trusting one's doctor is the #1 health mistake one can make.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DFG

so it wasn’t hush-hush, it was only hush.


3 posted on 11/08/2025 11:57:07 AM PST by NonValueAdded (First, I was a clinger, then deplorable, now I'm garbage. Feel the love? )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DFG
Looks a lot like a SRAM.

The drama queens writing this story act like this is something new.

4 posted on 11/08/2025 11:58:11 AM PST by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DFG

Donald Trump’s bomb?


5 posted on 11/08/2025 11:58:20 AM PST by HIDEK6 (God bless Donald Trump )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DFG

I read somewhere that there are actually only two choices for yield: 5kT, and 150kT.

That’s because it’s a hydrogen bomb with a fission trigger. The fission trigger yields 5kT, and the fusion bomb yields 145kt.

The selection either enables the fusion secondary, or disables it.


6 posted on 11/08/2025 11:58:24 AM PST by Steely Tom ([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HIDEK6

He made it himself. /s


7 posted on 11/08/2025 11:59:49 AM PST by yuleeyahoo (“Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!” - the deep-state)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HIDEK6

Well yeah. He’s responsible for everything evil right? Fidiots!


8 posted on 11/08/2025 12:02:01 PM PST by rktman (Destroy America from within? On hold! Enlisted USN 1967 proudly. 🚫💉! 🇮🇱🙏! Winning currently!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DFG
Looks like the one under the starboard wing was already deployed. No pictures of the results? Yeah. Thought so.
9 posted on 11/08/2025 12:03:53 PM PST by Texas Eagle ("Throw me to the wolves and I'll return leading the pack"- Donald J. Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded
so it wasn’t hush-hush, it was only hush.

There are two on the pylon. Hush. Hush.

10 posted on 11/08/2025 12:04:10 PM PST by null and void (New NYC hungry homeless begging sign: "I got what you voted for, PLEASE HELP!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DFG

Who knew Trump owned a nuke missile??


11 posted on 11/08/2025 12:05:00 PM PST by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

Oops. Starboard wing = port wing. Damn autocorrect! I know the difference between port and starboard!


12 posted on 11/08/2025 12:05:16 PM PST by Texas Eagle ("Throw me to the wolves and I'll return leading the pack"- Donald J. Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: HIDEK6

The warhead was tested?

Idiot writer doesn’t know the difference between a delivery system and a warhead.


13 posted on 11/08/2025 12:05:31 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DFG
And if experts are correct...

What do you mean "if" , paleface?

14 posted on 11/08/2025 12:07:02 PM PST by Texas Eagle ("Throw me to the wolves and I'll return leading the pack"- Donald J. Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DFG

Amazing for us that Donald Trump could order, implement, and field a nuclear missile in only 10 months...


15 posted on 11/08/2025 12:15:32 PM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /Sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DFG

“US President Donald Trump’s ‘secret’ city-destroying nuclear weapon”

No, it’s not Donald Trump’s weapon, it’s a military ordnance currently under development that he happens to approve of, and someday it might be added to the Ordnance Corp’s inventory.


16 posted on 11/08/2025 12:20:55 PM PST by equaviator (Nobody's perfect. That's why they put pencils on erasers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

There are two on the starboard wing on a pylon that appears capable of holding up to six. Chances are that the port pylon was empty at takeoff. Testing doesn’t always mean a full combat loadout.


17 posted on 11/08/2025 12:21:59 PM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /Sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DFG
These articles are becoming entertainment, pure and simple.

1) Wiggle words -- "appears to have been pictured for the first time by a planespotter during an alleged"

2) The detail on the photos seem rather good for capturing a plane at 5K feet. But here is one of his photos -- he copyrights them, so Daily Mail either got permission or paid for the use -- as he captured a plane from ABOVE it. [ Note this photo carries no copyright, though the DM photos carry copyright markings. ]

3) A "city-destroying nuclear missile" isn't much farther afield than out atomic bombs at the end of the War in the Pacific, which rather well destroyed two cities.

So who is he? "Retired- Curator of Herpetology" from the LA Zoo, and a guy with some film credits.

Ian Recchio is known for Little Giants (2019), Ancient Aliens (2009) and 72 Dangerous Animals: Latin America (2017).

Another opening, Another Show. And Daily Mail's the place to go!

18 posted on 11/08/2025 12:23:28 PM PST by Worldtraveler once upon a time (Degrow government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DFG

The Mamdani. Destroys cities.


19 posted on 11/08/2025 12:26:26 PM PST by HYPOCRACY (Wake up, smell the cat food in your bank account. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded
so it wasn’t hush-hush, it was only hush.

LOL!

Pretty sure we've all had city-destroying nukes since the 40s.

Problem is, retard Gen-Z journalists skipped this day in class so it's all new to them.

20 posted on 11/08/2025 12:27:44 PM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson