Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 10/21/2025 7:42:52 AM PDT by Words Matter
BBC Radio 4 producer Jayne Egerton steps down from admin role after sharing controversial post about Charlie Kirk's widow, raising questions about BBC staff impartiality.
(Excerpt) Read more at jfeed.com ...
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
The BBC’s coverage of Israel has been criticized for journalistic malpractice, consistently framing narratives to vilify Israel while downplaying Hamas’s actions. Below are ten cases highlighting systemic anti-Israel bias, editorial failures, and breaches of public trust.
The BBC omitted parts of an interview with Israeli President Herzog, including references to Churchill, BBC’s conduct, and criticism of Israel. Herzog’s emotional response to the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack, which killed 1,400 Israelis, was also cut, including his statement: “This is eight times bigger than 9/11—what else do you want us to do?” Spokesperson Naor Ihia criticized the BBC for selective editing, suspecting distortion.
Ahmed Alagha, a BBC Arabic freelance contributor since 2023, called the Israeli army “the embodiment of filth” and Jews “the devils of the hypocrites,” as reported by The Telegraph. His antisemitic remarks raised concerns about BBC’s vetting processes.
The BBC apologized for falsely claiming Israel targeted medical staff and Arabic speakers in Gaza. The correct statement was that IDF forces included medical staff and Arabic speakers for an operation, highlighting sloppy reporting.
The BBC’s documentary Gaza: How To Survive A Warzone featured a 13-year-old narrator, Abdullah al Yazouri, without disclosing his father, Ayman Alyazouri, was a Hamas deputy minister. An independent review criticized the production company and BBC for failing to vet the narrator, allowing a Hamas-linked voice to shape the narrative while sidelining the group’s role.
The BBC livestreamed a Bob Vylan performance at Glastonbury chanting “death to the IDF” on BBC iPlayer, despite flagging it as “high risk.” Critics, including UK Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy, accused the BBC of anti-Semitism. The broadcast led to a surge in UK antisemitic incidents, and Bob Vylan faced a criminal investigation and professional repercussions.
A leaked BBC email instructed staff to dismiss debates over Gaza aid quantities as “irrelevant” and claim the distribution system “doesn’t work,” obscuring Hamas’s documented theft and sabotage of aid. This directive deflected blame from Hamas onto Israel.
The BBC’s Panorama documentary Gaza: Dying for Food blamed the IDF for most of 1,300 Palestinian deaths near aid centers, ignoring evidence from ACLED and eyewitnesses that Hamas gunmen killed aid seekers. The reliance on Hamas-run Ministry of Health figures further skewed the narrative.
BBC Arabic cited Samer Elzaenen, a Palestinian journalist, despite his history of antisemitic posts, including praising Hitler and endorsing attacks on Jewish civilians. The BBC’s decision to platform him, even after his record was exposed, was called “sloppy” and “reckless.”
An internal BBC email marking the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack anniversary described it as “escalations in the Israel-Gaza conflict” and used an image of Palestinian suffering, ignoring Israeli victims. Critics, including Jewish community members, called it insensitive and biased.
BBC Radio 4 producer Jayne Egerton resigned from a social media group after calling Charlie Kirk’s widow a “Zionist handler” and sharing anti-Zionist content. The scandal, reported by Jewish News UK, highlighted ongoing concerns about BBC impartiality.
These cases reveal a pattern of anti-Israel bias at the BBC, from selective reporting to platforming controversial figures and obscuring Hamas’s actions. Critics argue the BBC’s editorial failures fuel anti-Israel sentiment, demanding greater accountability.
The BBC is actually government sponsored propaganda. It's no different than TASS or the old Pravda.
I do not understand this statement. "raising questions about BBC staff impartiality"
The BBC is a huge source of Britain's current problems. The poor British citizens don't know a darn thing! They've been dis-educated by the government-owned BBC.
That is wven worse
The amazing thing about this story is that the BBC forced her to step down over her comments. They are par for the wretched course at the BBC.
The BBC is just a hamas and muslem enabler they are so wound up the fascistness of islam, of muslems that they would kiss those animals feet and ask for more.
The real-life INGSOC decided that if two minutes hate was good, 24 hours hate would be even better.
Most upper class Brits are anti-semitic, aren’t they? Somebody prove me wrong.
“raising questions about BBC staff impartiality”
There are no questions about this. This has been known for at least 20 years.
“raising questions about BBC staff impartiality.”
Actually l don’t have any questions. We know exactly where they stand.
Almost spit my coffee out on my phone.
Too bad that most in British government perhaps share her view so no hope BBC would lose government money as NPR and PBS did.
BBC
Biased
Bs
Cr#p
Interesting news site and good information. Thanks for posting.
I’m for the Zionists. Muslims have always caused problems worldwide — wherever they go, whatever they conquer. The Zionists have made the desert bloom and made a prosperous home for a persecuted people.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.