Posted on 08/19/2025 3:35:47 PM PDT by little jeremiah
It’s been under attack since WWII.
Gen.Flynn knows history. The Soros machine and friends are trying to create “color revolution” in Serbia now. Hope it doesn’t work. Globalists want to destroy national soveignty, traditiona, culture, history, language, and religion, so they can usher in a world government with no freedoms whatsoever.
Accelerating quickly now.
The Russians might choose to get involved if that happens.
As Bismarck said, “When war comes to Europe, it will be some damn fool thing in the Balkans that sets it off.”
Sarajavo.
Might be of interest.
Bookmark
>> The Globalist agenda often targets faith, particularly Christianity, which provides a moral framework that challenges globalist absolutism.
^^^^^^^^^^ THIS ^^^^^^^^^^
I’m a Christian, and I’m a nationalist.
I’m not exactly a “Christian Nationalist”, because I’m not looking for a theocracy, unless Christ Himself is the King! While “the earth [remains] in the hand of the sons of men”, I favor and value America’s constitutional republic, and believe that form of government to be closest to God’s heart for His creation.
Globalism, humanism, transhumanism, socialism, marxism — along with islam — are of the devil and are to be resisted.
It’s been under attack since WWII
****************
Nationalism took a hit because of a very bad actor in Germany, a guy that couldn’t limit German nationalism within German borders and went on a suicidal war of conquest.
However, it won’t matter what current globalists do, their goose is cooked, they had “their run” & the nationalist backlash is building momentum.
Economic reality will unwind the globalist fantasy economy much quicker than the time it took to build it.
They’re “Humpty Dumpty” but are arrogant and can’t see it yet.
Nationalism took a hit because of a very bad actor in Germany, a guy that couldn’t limit German nationalism within German borders and went on a suicidal war of conquest.
They focused on the “Nation” part, instead of the “Socialist” part. They should have been called “Sozis” instead of “Nazis”.
We do live in interesting times, but I guess it’s better than being a Stark.
The US and BJ Clinton, should have stayed away from Serbia. Nice how we treat old allies. The Serbs fought the Nazis and their fellow occupants Croatia in WW 2. We tore into them in favor of Muslim terrorists. WTF was the reason for that?
I remember that... everything Klintoon touched turned rotten. Leftists always side with Muzzies.
Hitler, the Taliban, and Islamic terrorism came about from the US intervening in WW 1. Every single time we try to control countries other than our own, another problem sprouts.
The UK, had their hand all over the ME, and was on the hunt since way back in history. We should have left them to their own natural consequences, and let wars die down without US involvement.
What’s a “Stark”?
Look at the two biggest allies we had in WWII, China and Russia.
Soon after they became our enemies.
I would also point out that Italy and Japan were allies in WWI.
Game of Thrones reference
“Hitler, the Taliban, and Islamic terrorism came about from the US intervening in WW 1. Every single time we try to control countries other than our own, another problem sprouts.
The UK, had their hand all over the ME, and was on the hunt since way back in history. We should have left them to their own natural consequences, and let wars die down without US involvement.”
___________________________________________________________
The US entered WWI largely due to Germany’s unrestricted submarine warfare against US flagged ships. Us public sentiment turned sharply against Germany, and for intervention, when a communication between Germany and Mexico (known as the Zimmerman telegram)demonstrated efforts by Germany to enlist Mexico as an ally against the USA.
The “natural consequences” you admire would have included German attacks on the mainland USA from Mexico.
The U-Boat warfare was in response to Britain’s Naval Blockade of Germany, which would not have allowed US ships to dock in German ports, even though the US was technically “neutral”.
But the fact is, since the US was rapidly beefing up the Pacific Fleet, we did rely heavily on the Royal Navy for our Atlantic Security, which is really why we could never be ‘neutral’, as far as Britain was involved.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.