Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 08/03/2025 5:23:06 PM PDT by texas booster
Truly glorious irony.
The state attorney general has asked a federal judge in Mississippi to explain errors in a recent ruling, which some lawyers speculated were made by artificial intelligence.
U.S. District Judge Henry T. Wingate issued a temporary restraining order on July 20 that paused the enforcement of a state law that prohibits diversity, equity and inclusion programs in public schools. But the order was riddled with mistakes — naming plaintiffs who weren’t parties to the suit, quoting state law incorrectly and referring to cases that don’t appear to exist.
(Excerpt) Read more at frontpagemag.com ...
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
On the same day in New Jersey, U.S. District Judge Julien Neals withdrew a ruling he issued in a securities lawsuit after defense attorneys told, opens new tab the court that the decision made factual errors and included quotes that the lawyers said were not in the cited cases.
Neals is a Biden appointee. ...
AI has enabled all sorts of DEI employees to not do their jobs. But a federal judge who lets AI write his rulings is violating professional standards and should be dealt with.
Short and sweet. Or bittersweet. Judges can be corrupt, and Democrat judges the most corrupt.
Ping out to the Daniel Greenfield Ping! list.
As always, please FReepmail me if you want on or off the esteemed Daniel Greenfield ping list.
Daniel Greenfield's website: The Sultan Knish blog
Something these 2 judges have in common besides no brain ?
AI is DIE or worse?
The future is looking bleak.
A judge using AI this way, even once, should be summarily impeached.
If Justice Jumanji Brown used AI to write her dissents, it would be a distinct improvement, and far more accurate.
Yeah, the ‘not real’ write up for our band make the Beatles look like hacks. 🤣🤣🤣🤣👍
In a perfect world but the Democrats would never support it.
AI
Not artificial, it is real.
Not Intelligent- it is idiotic really.
Not trustworthy. Of course DEI communists use it.
I’m not very impressed with natural intelligence these days.
L
That is, the FIRST thing a losing party does is research the injunction itself or the ruling (by AI) to look for artificial or copied or objectively false sentences and references.
Use AI to look for plagiarism, like every high school teacher now has to do on every writing assignment.
In a word, lazy. Bob Grant would refer to this Judge as a “washroom attendant.”
Use of Artificial Intelligence reveals organic stupidity.
CC
Almost certainly, the draft opinion was written by the Judge’s law clerk. But in the end, that doesn’t matter. Either he is hiring the wrong people or not supervision their work properly. To me, that’s grounds for impeachment and removal from office. Nobody practicing before him can have any faith in his judgments moving forward.
“DEI” = “Don’t Expect Intelligence”
Indeed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.