Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 07/20/2025 4:12:38 PM PDT by Words Matter
Once a global leader in civil liberties and the fight against fascism, Britain now faces a lingering question: Will ethnic Britons become a minority in their homeland?
In one of the most provocative speeches heard in the British Parliament in recent years, MP Andrew Bridgen claimed that “over the past 100 years, approximately 250,000 women and girls have been raped in Britain, with 90% of the perpetrators being Muslim.”
(Excerpt) Read more at jpost.com ...
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
The lights are going out all over Europe.
The rump UK empire globalists in the city of London are imposing the same “divide and rule” strategies on England that they employed on most of their former colonies.
The USA is a big target as well.
Charles Martel fought for nothing, Europe will realize that or they are doomed.
“A warning shot for us here in the US”
Everyone is blaming the ‘boomers’.
“Once a global leader in civil liberties and the fight against fascism,”
When was this? Most British soldiers in WWI could not vote. The Germans could and had for decades. When the Brits fought fascism, it was to protect the Empire, not to spread freedom. Free speech has always been a stepchild there with only a few good moments.
“Once a global leader in civil liberties”
Quite a remarkable assertion.
Everywhere except in South Africa, China, India, Pakistan, Iraq, Syria, Arabia, Kuwait, Iran, Crimea, Egypt, Ireland, Israel/Palestine, etc.
Now they are being flooded with the third world who has very little good feelings about them.
I had no idea about the WWI era voting stuff.
This is a basic question that nobody seems to ask. Why do Muslims “have to” come into countries like the UK and why does the UK “have to” let them in? Why can’t Muslims simply stay where they are? Or if they sneak into the UK, why can’t they be booted out? The article talks about “enacting legal safeguards to curb the foreign influence,” blah blah blah, but why is it never an option to simply KEEP THEM OUT?
That's what the people who run their government want.
Perfidious Albion alert!
“Everyone is blaming the ‘boomers’.”
I thought everyone was blaming the democrats, the deep staters, the New World, One World crowd.
“Once a global leader in civil liberties”
Britain ended slavery in the world, brought civilization to those areas of the world.
Looks like you are a product of modern public education.
It seems like this is the goal.
It is an absolute fact the England will become muslim. The beautiful blonde hair blue eyed Brit will become history. Muslims have been given the vote and soon the Brits will be wearing Hijabs and other rags to pacify Ally. They will be living in abject poverty.
Importing large numbers of Third Worlders and using them to replace the native population has been going on in Europe since the 1960s. It started so slow that you probably wouldn’t notice it, but ramped up big time in the 90s. And then went into overdrive starting in 2014. In fact, one positive thing that Gaddafi did was halt the flow (at least from Libya). I can’t help but wonder if that was the real reason he was overthrown and killed.
There seems to be no will in Western Europe to halt it. In fact, in most cases, the Government seems to be doing all it can to encourage and support the migrants.
How do they really think this is going to end? Is it not obvious by now?
Keep in mind that the ‘new arrivals’ only have to be about 25 to 30 percent of the population to seize power, due to them being young and mostly male, with the Brits being old and fat.
It won’t even be close when they make their move, and, at that point, we will wish we hadn’t spent DECADES letting the Neocons start and fight useless wars...as we’ll have a REAL FRIEND in need, and likely many others in Europe.
Lots of UK residents have asked that question of their local governments. I recall looking at gov.uk websites that held impressively long FAQ sections - and there were always entries concerning "asylum seekers". Point-blank stuff, too, like: "Now that their home country is no longer suffering war or political strife, can the asylum seekers begin leaving the UK?" The answer was always some double-talk about violating some UN Agreement. IIRC, one of the sites I viewed was in Kirklees. You might still find the content I describe, or you may have to paste the url into the waybackmachine and look at snapshots from ten years ago or longer.
The UN has always worked against the first-world nations.
Ask the Celts how that works.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.