If there’s one thing I’ve learned from watching all these so-called investigations over the years, it’s that the outcome depends almost entirely on who’s running it. If it’s a squish, an institutionalist, a deep-state loyalist, someone new to the issue, or anyone easily misled or compromised by the system, nothing will come of it, no matter how damning the facts are.
When it comes to charging anyone for the Obama-led conspiracy to frame Trump for Russia collusion, the issue isn’t whether it’s chargeable. We already know the facts. The only question that matters is who’s in charge? Because only a tiny handful of people have what this moment demands, which is both the hard-earned knowledge that comes from years of fighting in the trenches, and the rare kind of integrity that can’t be faked or bought. You can’t parachute someone in at the last minute and expect them to understand the depth of this rot. It has to be someone who’s lived it, tracked every lie, and never sold out. Someone like Ed Martin.
So again, the only question that matters right now is who’s running this?
As Hans indicates, we have the facts. Will Pam Bondi deliver or will shed go the way of Jeff Sessions?
“Institutionalist” is the most common description used to describe Kash. He’s one of those “99% of the FBI is good”, we just need to let them do their jobs, types.
Great quesiton. I guess we shall see who is who and who goes after whom.