Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

First Nations leaders walk out of Mark Carney meeting on Building Canada Act
The Guardian ^ | Sat 19 Jul 2025 | Olivia Bowden

Posted on 07/19/2025 7:02:07 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican

Several First Nations leaders have walked out of a meeting with Mark Carney, as an event the Canadian prime minister hoped would assuage their concerns over his Building Canada Act instead left many with growing concern that it would violate their rights.

Carney has spent recent weeks promoting the act, which passed last month as part of Bill C-5 and which he says is a key part of his campaign promise to ensure Canada’s economy is less dependent on the US under Donald Trump, who has repeatedly threatened huge tariffs.

The legislation sets out a framework for major building projects, such as pipelines and mines to exploit natural resources infrastructure including ports, railways and electricity grids.

Under the act, certain projects designated as “nation-building” could be fast-tracked and override environmental and other planning regulations. To qualify, it says the projects should strengthen Canada’s autonomy and security, provide economic “or other” benefits and support the interests of Indigenous peoples, while meeting Canada’s objectives to tackle the climate crisis.

The government has not yet said which projects will be fast-tracked, but the minister responsible for Indigenous relations, Rebecca Alty, said it would consult provinces, territories and Indigenous peoples to agree those suitable.

Earlier this week, however, nine First Nations in Ontario communities launched a constitutional challenge against the federal government over Bill C-5, and against the province over similar legislation recently passed there.

(Excerpt) Read more at theguardian.com ...


TOPICS: Canada
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 07/19/2025 7:02:07 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

The begging for donations by the Guardian at the end of the article was particularly distasteful.


2 posted on 07/19/2025 7:10:34 PM PDT by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

They should tell Carney they’ll be checking out options on this side of the border.


3 posted on 07/19/2025 7:13:53 PM PDT by bigbob (Yes. We ARE going back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

51st state or not? 41M people > Cali. 2.7T GDP ~= Texas. 3.8M sq mi ~= the US. Other than the frogs it seems like a good bargain.


4 posted on 07/19/2025 7:14:21 PM PDT by ScottHammett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Looks like Bill C-5 is useless for Brookfield Carney without Native support.


5 posted on 07/19/2025 7:18:49 PM PDT by existentially_kuffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

How ‘bout that?

They’re not called “Native Canadians.”


6 posted on 07/19/2025 7:20:25 PM PDT by july4thfreedomfoundation (Russia? China? Democrats and RINOs are the biggest threat to the survival of America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
First Nations? Is that like the Fifth Third Nations?

7 posted on 07/19/2025 7:32:20 PM PDT by Governor Dinwiddie ( O give thanks unto the Lord, for He is gracious, and his mercy endures forever. — Psalm 106)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Governor Dinwiddie

It’s the Canuck term for *Native Americans* or what we used to just call *Indians*.

It’s actually more accurate because the Americans never had a native population. All the inhabitants the explorers met here allegedly came over the ice bridge during the last ice age.

So the Indians were just here first. But they are not native.


8 posted on 07/19/2025 7:36:40 PM PDT by metmom (He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon." Amen. Come, Lord Jesus….)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

When were the “First Nations” given veto power of pretty much all infrastructure investment and resources production in Canada?

It wasn’t like this 50 years ago, and certainly Canada has increasingly become a woke, race-mongering political cesspool - but what act or regulation enabled this slippery-slope?


9 posted on 07/19/2025 8:09:34 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Elbows up
pants down
bend over
here it comes


10 posted on 07/20/2025 5:40:48 AM PDT by Steven Tyler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson