Replies

I like your "logic!" Nothing ever changes. The world is static ... and will always remain that way. The Earth is the center of the universe.

Logic?

For starters...

You mean like your Appeal to Novelty Fallacy, especially since you stick to it after being shown that electric cars aren't new.

Also your Straw Man Fallacy, assuming people prefer internal combustion automobiles because they're holding onto history, ignoring that they reject electric vehicles because electric vehicles are a downgrade for them from internal combustion automobiles.

Add in your Bandwagon Fallacy, that because you want something, others who won't jump on the bandwagon are wrong.

You're also Arguing from Inertia ("Stay the Course") - The fallacy that it is necessary to continue on a mistaken course of action regardless of pain and sacrifice involved and even after discovering it is mistaken, because changing course would mean admitting that one's decision was wrong, and all one's effort, expense, and sacrifice was for nothing, and that's unthinkable.

You're pushing the Positive Thinking Fallacy - Refusing to acknowledge the reality of negative aspects of electric vehicles. You putting your head in the sand doesn't make the problems and limitations of electric vehicles go away.

Electric cars are pushed with the "Save the Children" Fallacy as well as Scare Tactics. They're also pushed as a Two-sides Fallacy - making it seem that two sides have equal weight or significance, when a much stronger argument supports just one side.

You buy all the electric vehicles you want but don't try to force it on others as the Leftists are doing.

You can promote any solution you want but we'll reject any so-called "solution" to fictional problems such as Globull Warming.

We'll rightfully reject any proposed solution that's not better than the one we have had in place for more than a century.