Skip to comments.
Federal judge issues new nationwide block against Trump’s order seeking to end birthright citizenship
CNN via MSN ^
| jULY 10, 2025
| Devan Cole
Posted on 07/10/2025 9:01:06 AM PDT by libstripper
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
Looks like birthright citizenship issue will eventually get to SCOTUS. The decision in the nationwide injunction case bodes well for a proper decision in the birthright citizenship cases because the Court based its decision there on a careful historic analysis of the equity powers of the Federal courts, concluding that such nationwide power was not contemplated in Congress original decision to grant equity powers to the Federal courts. If SCOTUS follows through with that line of reasoning in the birthright cases, it should rule in favor of the EO because the history of the 14th Amendment shows it was intended primarily to benefit former slaves and their descendants.
To: libstripper
Yes. It was a mistake to not make it clearer way back then, and when you read the historical context, it is pretty clear the 14th Amendment was not meant to allow someone to become an American citizen because their mother crawled onto a beach and had a baby.
It was meant to address the status of people who had been slaves.
2
posted on
07/10/2025 9:04:51 AM PDT
by
rlmorel
(Factio Communistica Sinensis Delenda Est.)
To: libstripper
Well this is the right way to do it. The class and mass action lawsuit option was created for this purpose, but rather than use it, they shopped for judges who would issue universal injunctions. Now it is following the proper course at least.
3
posted on
07/10/2025 9:05:56 AM PDT
by
bigbob
(Yes. We ARE going back)
To: libstripper
I understood the SC banned nationwide injunctions from district justices. They don’t seem to care because absolutely nothing happens to them.
To: libstripper
The ruling from US District Judge Joseph Laplante is significant because the Supreme Court last month curbed the power of lower court judges to issue nationwide injunctions *************
No it didn't deter them. To the country, USSC weakness only encouraged them to keep issuing more blocking injunctions.
5
posted on
07/10/2025 9:06:21 AM PDT
by
Starboard
To: scan_complete
The exception from that ruling is if it is a class action suit, which in this case it is. So now it will proceed to SCOTUS and be decided (hopefully) once and for all.
6
posted on
07/10/2025 9:07:57 AM PDT
by
ripnbang
("An armed man is a citizen, an unarmed man, a subject.")
To: libstripper
7
posted on
07/10/2025 9:08:32 AM PDT
by
JusPasenThru
(Make America Florida! )
To: libstripper
Ain't NO WAY that THIS USSC (Robert's Court) is gonna eliminate Anchor Babies. With the borders closed, it's the ONLY way they can continue to import "dozens of family members", and assure that non-citizens can STILL drop in to the USA and plop an anchor baby.
8
posted on
07/10/2025 9:09:57 AM PDT
by
traditional2
("Is it them, again, Yogi?")
To: libstripper
ussc left a loophole for a class action which this is
9
posted on
07/10/2025 9:11:09 AM PDT
by
joshua c
To: libstripper
an abrupt change of policy that was longstandingScrew the law! This is how we been doing it, so the law doesn't actually matter.
10
posted on
07/10/2025 9:11:18 AM PDT
by
dware
(Americans prefer peaceful slavery over dangerous freedom)
To: libstripper
Does the fact that Trump doesn’t try to do this through congress tell us all we need to know about congress?
11
posted on
07/10/2025 9:15:26 AM PDT
by
SaxxonWoods
(The road is a dangerous place man, you can die out here...or worse. -Johnny Paycheck, 1980, Reno, NV)
To: bigbob
Don’t you have to be identified in order to be part of the class. Sounds like a good way to create a list of kids whose parents need deportin’.
To: libstripper
Time to throw this ball back in the SCOTUS’ court. Maybe they can change it to anyone, regardless of citizenship, who passes a deuce inside the U.S. borders is automatically a “U.S. Citizen”. This is just following along the lines the court has already established.
13
posted on
07/10/2025 9:22:22 AM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(DemonRAT politicians say tha pt their voters are all murderers who want American blood for illegals.)
To: libstripper
Apparently there is no mechanism for the titular head the judicial branch, the SCOTUS to discipline its inferior court judges.
Lawless, renegade federal district court judges. Go figger.
14
posted on
07/10/2025 9:24:38 AM PDT
by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
To: libstripper
This federal district courts “thumbing their noses” at the SCOTUS pretty much supports my assertion, the only real power the judicial branch has is the deference paid to it by the other two branches and the people.
15
posted on
07/10/2025 9:29:31 AM PDT
by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
To: rlmorel
This and everything else that POTUS Trump has established through EO is going to have to be codified by worthless Congress especially this insanity of instant Americans. I doubt most of it will.
16
posted on
07/10/2025 9:31:35 AM PDT
by
shanover
(...To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave e them.-S.Adams)
To: libstripper
Supreme Court gets punked again.
17
posted on
07/10/2025 9:31:47 AM PDT
by
Bonemaker
(invictus maneo)
To: libstripper
Time for the SCOTUS to decide if they are with the American people or the DemonRATs and the world’s Birthright Vacation industries. The Chinese love ‘em.
18
posted on
07/10/2025 9:36:07 AM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(DemonRAT politicians say tha pt their voters are all murderers who want American blood for illegals.)
To: libstripper
If the “class” consists of unborn children, apparently the ACLU now supports the rights of the unborn.
To: libstripper
Doesn’t get much dirtier than a (W) Bush nominee with Georgetown undergrad and law degrees.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson