Skip to comments.
Glass bottles found to contain more microplastics than plastic bottles
Science X ^
| June 20, 2025
| Rébecca Frasquet
Posted on 06/21/2025 12:23:22 PM PDT by george76
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
1
posted on
06/21/2025 12:23:22 PM PDT
by
george76
To: george76
Where’s the graphic of the, “Oh noes, we are all gonna die”?
2
posted on
06/21/2025 12:25:27 PM PDT
by
A Navy Vet
(USA Birth Certificate - 1789. Death Certificate - 2021? )
To: george76

I say we totally revert to using these. It's the only way to be sure.
To: george76
So it’s coming from the food processing chain. Duh
To: ClearCase_guy; The Spirit Of Allegiance; SunkenCiv; Rennes Templar
I say we totally revert to using these. It's the only way to be sure. Amphorit. How about the rest of you?
5
posted on
06/21/2025 12:34:51 PM PDT
by
Ezekiel
(🆘️ "Come fly with US". 🔴 Ingenuity -- because the Son of David begins with MARS ♂️, aka every man)
To: george76
Maybe from all the plastic tubing and fittings in the production process?
To: george76
Glad I use this camel bladder handed down for 500 years. Stuff tastes funny but safe.
7
posted on
06/21/2025 12:44:13 PM PDT
by
Karliner
(Heb 4:12 Rom 8:28 Rev 3, "...This is the end of the beginning." Churchill)
To: george76
OK… all you cap-licking ZEEPERS have been warned. ;-)
8
posted on
06/21/2025 12:49:26 PM PDT
by
House Atreides
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CnVFlcTy0DcI’m now ULTRA-MAGA-PRO-MAX>)
To: Karliner
Does it turn your milk into yoghurt?
To: george76
Drinks including water, soda, beer and wine sold in glass bottles contain more microplastics than those in plastic bottles
= = =
OK
How about Vodka in plastic bottles. That has to be good, right?
10
posted on
06/21/2025 12:51:26 PM PDT
by
Scrambler Bob
(Running Rampant, and not endorsing nonsense; My pronoun is EXIT. And I am generally full of /S)
To: george76
Any proof that those contaminates weren’t there all along?
11
posted on
06/21/2025 12:58:27 PM PDT
by
GingisK
To: george76
How much beer do we have in plastic bottles?
I think Guinness might have some.
To: Karliner
Glad I use this camel bladder handed down for 500 years. Stuff tastes funny but safe.
Well, yeah, but you are limited to old wine. You cannot put new wine in such an old bladder.
13
posted on
06/21/2025 1:04:02 PM PDT
by
Dr. Sivana
("Whatsoever he shall say to you, do ye." (John 2:5))
To: george76
Goatskins (Botabags)?
Clay pots?
What can we drink from?
I know! Experts want us to stop drinking water altogether. Coupled with the alarm that human breathing adds to climate change, I’m beginning to think they may not have our best interests at heart
14
posted on
06/21/2025 1:14:59 PM PDT
by
CFW
To: george76
15
posted on
06/21/2025 1:20:10 PM PDT
by
sauropod
(Make sure Satan has to climb over a lot of Scripture to get to you. John MacArthur Ne supra crepidam)
To: george76
I think the more pertinent question is which source is more likely to lead to those microplastics being released into the environment and our bodies?
16
posted on
06/21/2025 1:22:39 PM PDT
by
lastchance
(Cognovit Dominus qui sunt eius.)
To: lastchance; george76
I commented too soon (mea culpa) it is not the glass which contains the microplastics but the plastic cap. The lede is misleading.
“We then noticed that in the glass, the particles emerging from the samples were the same shape, color and polymer composition—so therefore the same plastic—as the paint on the outside of the caps that seal the glass bottles,” she said.
17
posted on
06/21/2025 1:25:53 PM PDT
by
lastchance
(Cognovit Dominus qui sunt eius.)
To: Ezekiel
Hahaha…I see what you did there.
18
posted on
06/21/2025 1:32:06 PM PDT
by
liberalh8ter
( This tagline has taken the month off to attend the inauguration.)
To: Ezekiel
Amphorae change in our drinking containers too!
CC
To: george76
Key phrase in this article:
“… there is no reference level for a potentially toxic amount of microplastics…”
That’s like the “forever chemicals” that have been hysterically reported on. The reason they are very persistent is that they are very non-reactive, which is a little counterintuitive considering they contain fluorine. The biggest problem with them is that some of them are similar enough in shape to the nucleic acid base pairs to interfere with replication and translation of DNA/RNA.
20
posted on
06/21/2025 2:06:17 PM PDT
by
VanShuyten
("...that all the donkeys were dead. I know nothing as to the fate of the less valuable anima)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson