Skip to comments.
City Gov to Seize 175-Year-Old Farm by Eminent Domain, Replace with Affordable Housing
agweb.com ^
| June 11, 2025
| Chris Bennett
Posted on 06/12/2025 8:39:18 PM PDT by lowbridge
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 next last
1
posted on
06/12/2025 8:39:18 PM PDT
by
lowbridge
To: lowbridge
This kind of crap is why people loathe government.
2
posted on
06/12/2025 8:43:02 PM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: lowbridge
I wonder how much federal $$$ Cranbury Township will get out of this.
3
posted on
06/12/2025 8:46:31 PM PDT
by
Ken H
(Trump 2024)
To: lowbridge
4
posted on
06/12/2025 8:48:16 PM PDT
by
kiryandil
(No one in AZ that voted for Trump voted for Gallego )
To: lowbridge
A RERUN OF THE KELO DECISION???
CITY IS WRONG
5
posted on
06/12/2025 8:49:14 PM PDT
by
ridesthemiles
(not giving up on TRUMP---EVER)
To: lowbridge
I don’t see how the Cranbury Township Committee can’t force someone to sell.
To: Secret Agent Man
Where does Trump come down on this situation?
7
posted on
06/12/2025 8:51:19 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
(YMMV)
To: kiryandil
8
posted on
06/12/2025 8:54:34 PM PDT
by
heartwood
(Please blame all ridiculous or iinappropriate words on autocorrect. Thank you. )
To: lowbridge
And you wonder why a guy armors up a Komatsu bulldozer and seeks revenge?
9
posted on
06/12/2025 8:55:54 PM PDT
by
Clay Moore
(My pistol identifies as a cordless hole punch. )
To: lowbridge
Now, here's a guy that has no concept of the life he can give his offspring if he sold that property. $20-30 million for a 21-acre farm? Heck, Andy, shoot me an Email and maybe your buyers and myself can reach a deal on a 160-acre farm I have in Oklahoma that's been around since the land rush. Heck, if they want to give me 30 million for what I have, they can have that, and I can go buy myself and each of my kids a 100 acre farm on the shores of Toledo Bend or Lake-of-the-Pines, and I'll still have money to put in the bank.
(Pssssttt Andy - you can't take it with you.)
To: lowbridge
Seize the land of every member of the Cranbury Township Committee. No “laws for thee but not for me”.
To: ridesthemiles
Mount Laurel decision. NJ Supreme Court required towns to build affordable housing. Legislature set quotas to comply. If a town doesn’t build housing or pay another town to build housing, builders can sue to force the town to let them develop and include affordable housing. After 20 years or so, affordable reverts to market-rate, and the town needs to build more.
The state is so brilliant that the median strip of the Garden State Parkway has been counted as buildable acreage.
12
posted on
06/12/2025 8:59:57 PM PDT
by
heartwood
(Please blame all ridiculous or iinappropriate words on autocorrect. Thank you. )
To: lowbridge
Donate the land to a "church" that will continue to lease out the land for agri-business.
Checkmate.
To: eastexsteve
Now, here's a guy that thinks differently from you, so he must be an idiot.
14
posted on
06/12/2025 9:02:16 PM PDT
by
NorthMountain
(... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
To: lowbridge
Looks like a few of the selectmen of the township need to wake up with horse's heads in their beds.
15
posted on
06/12/2025 9:03:04 PM PDT
by
Governor Dinwiddie
( O give thanks unto the Lord, for He is gracious, and His mercy endures forever. — Psalm 106)
To: heartwood
NJ Supreme Court required towns to build affordable housing. The President can't legislate by fiat ... that power is reserved to judges.
16
posted on
06/12/2025 9:03:37 PM PDT
by
NorthMountain
(... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
To: lowbridge
all while buyout offers ballooned to $20-30 million. "affordable housing" is another scam. The developer figured out he could spend 1/4 of that buying some local town politicians, and he could get the land after all.
17
posted on
06/12/2025 9:04:10 PM PDT
by
PGR88
To: heartwood
After 20 years or so, affordable reverts to market-rate, and the town needs to build more. That's their excuse. If they want to maintain the ratio of "low income housing", let them knock down their own houses. That'll increase the ratio because you know they aren't living in low-income housing.
To: kiryandil
To: kiryandil
20
posted on
06/12/2025 9:08:27 PM PDT
by
Repeal The 17th
(Get out of the matrix and get a real life.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson