Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Coal Is the New Bridge Fuel
Real Clear Wire. ^ | June 03, 2025 | Bernard L. Weinstein

Posted on 06/05/2025 1:21:47 PM PDT by george76

Once again, the consensus of government and private weather forecasters is that this coming summer will witness above-average temperatures in most parts of the United States. Already, warnings have been sounded that America’s power grids will be under great stress—as has been the case for a number of years—with a strong probability of blackouts and brownouts in some parts of the country. For example, the North American Electric Reliability Corporation’s (NERC) summer reliability assessment published on May 18 cited the 15-state Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO) as the regional grid most likely to see a meltdown this summer.

NERC’s warning proved to be prescient. On May 25, more than 100,000 customers in and around New Orleans lost power for most of the day when electricity demand exceeded supply, despite an emergency order from the Department of Energy several days earlier to keep a 1,560 megawatt coal plant in Michigan on-line that was slated for closure by the end of May. ERCOT, the Texas grid operator, has also warned of possible outages this summer due to potential low solar and wind energy availability during peak demand.

The strains on America’s power grids are easy to explain. After remaining relatively flat for a decade, electricity demand is now projected to jump 50% over the next 10 years. Investments in server farms, artificial intelligence, crypto-mining, and a revival of manufacturing activity account for most of this growth. For example, a recent study by the Berkeley National Laboratory found that data centers consumed 4% of total U.S. electricity in 2023 but will account for 12% of power demand by 2028.

At the same time, construction of new base-load power plants—natural gas, nuclear, and coal—has plummeted. Driven by federal, state, and local tax incentives, wind and solar have accounted for the lion’s share of new installed generation in recent years. The problem, of course, is that these power sources are intermittent, which is why New Orleans lost electricity in May and why the Iberian Peninsula suffered a blackout in April.

Although several states—most notably Texas—have adopted programs to encourage new construction of natural gas plants, for the near term it’s critical to keep the nation’s remaining coal plants online.

Since 2010, 300 “always on” coal-fired power plants have been closed, reducing its share of generation from 45% to 16% nationwide. Only about 200 remain on the regional grids today.

The Trump administration has taken several steps to enhance power grid reliability and resiliency by keeping these coal plants on-line, including a series of executive orders signed by the President in early April. One of these orders allows a number of aging coal plants slated for closure to continue producing power.

Not surprisingly, these actions have energized environmentalists who remain committed to shuttering the remaining coal fleet and banning the construction of any new fossil fuel power plants. But the renewables-or-nothing approach they favor is crashing into a new energy reality. Not only is power demand poised to surge but building and connecting wind and solar plants, as well as the infrastructure needed to integrate them into the grid, is proving increasingly costly and challenging. Coupled with higher interest rates and supply chain challenges, local opposition to wind and solar farms, as well as new transmission lines, is having a significant impact on the speed and scale at which new generation is entering service.

The era of tearing down existing, well-operating power plants before reliable replacement capacity is built and connected to the grid is over. The on-demand power plants already in service are more valuable than ever. While coal’s long-term future remains in question, its near-term importance is clear. Our existing fleet of coal plants can help us manage the transition to a more reliable and resilient energy future as we build the next generation of base-load resources.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: coal

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


1 posted on 06/05/2025 1:21:47 PM PDT by george76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: george76

.


2 posted on 06/05/2025 1:32:29 PM PDT by sauropod (Make sure Satan has to climb over a lot of Scripture to get to you. John MacArthur Ne supra crepidam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

I’m liking what I hear and read about “Deep Fission”.


3 posted on 06/05/2025 1:39:48 PM PDT by pingman ("Step right up! Get your free helicopter ride, courtesy of Pinochet Air!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pingman
Interesting concept. I'd hope the risk of one going bad would be "1/a lot". But then I presume they'd hope to sell "a lot" of them. Saving on surface containment costs and personnel costs. Hoping the basic design keeps the risks low and the depth keeps any unwanted consequences well buried. But if if the risk per unit is non-zero and there are enough units something will eventually go wrong. Not necessarily a big something. Alas the depth makes access sufficient to fix even small problems problematic. Can they for sure shut down a broken reactor, permanently, without further active effort, from the surface? If reactor can melt down, can it irradiate the water table then have that contaminated water reach the surface, reach wells, etc? Nuclear power, to date, has had a good safety record, but not a perfect one. The handful of reactors we've managed to break have not been simple to fix, and simply burying their waste near the accident hasn't always worked well.
4 posted on 06/05/2025 2:25:32 PM PDT by JohnBovenmyer (MAGA urge to purge the dirge of O'Biden's scourge and splurge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: george76

These issues are self-inflicted and have nothing to do with warmer summers but closing power plants due to “climate change hippies”...


5 posted on 06/05/2025 2:50:34 PM PDT by packrat35 (Pureblood! No clot shot for me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; BraveMan; cardinal4; ...

6 posted on 06/05/2025 5:52:43 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (The best thing about a muzzie civil war is, everyone wins.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: george76

hA!


7 posted on 06/05/2025 8:18:43 PM PDT by CPT Clay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: packrat35

As I like to say, you cannot power modern civilization with wind, solar, and unicorn flatulence.

>After remaining relatively flat for a decade,

I’d like to know how much of that was because of adoption of LED lighting. That’s about over with, so that flattening of demand will not be with us much longer.


8 posted on 06/06/2025 12:58:29 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson