Posted on 06/03/2025 3:47:11 PM PDT by USA-FRANCE
Trump and Maga is not pro Russia
It’s just coincidence that we hope Putin wins
It's outrageous we were spending money on it.
No real conservative would oppose it being shutdown.
I agree with you — it’s important to approach newspapers with a healthy dose of skepticism, including those on the right. My father always taught me to “read between the lines” and to never take any information at face value. The article clip you shared about UFOs is intriguing, especially since it’s a topic that often finds traction in right-wing media. I remember when Tucker Carlson was heavily focused on the UFO phenomenon for a while — though it seems like he’s dialed that back recently.
FYI, this unit of the State Department was formed to CREATE LIES regarding Trump and Russia - the date GIVES IT AWAY:
“The U.S. government established its first counter-disinformation unit, the Global Engagement Center (GEC), in 2016. The GEC was created as an agency within the U.S. Department of State”
Since I stand behind Trump’s comprehensive 40-point agenda to counter Russia, that makes me a genuine Trump supporter.
If you oppose that list, then you’re clearly at odds with Trump’s policies outlined in it. So how does that make you Trump-friendly?
Let’s be real — logic matters here, my FRiend.
Quit posting cut-n-paste propaganda Eurotrash.
POTUS:
My way or the highway
This article is a hit job.
When Beatie spoke about Russia “infiltrating” the West it’s nothing different than what China has been doing for decades!
Again, a negative spin of a story which if you want to put a positive spin on it would read: Russia needs to “engage” western media the arts and entertainment as well as policy makers.
It is important to have Russia’s voice heard, to have their side represented.
Indeed that is a major problem ever since we shut down RT in the US because they ran stories the Democrats and Obama didn’t like while the so-called conservatives, still stuck in a Cold War, went along with this censorship crap.
Had the Russian perspective been told, would Biden really have pushed for NATO expansion the way he did?
You basically don’t get the “Russian side” of the story, and whether people want to believe it or not, there always are two sides.
When one side is ignored, you’re going to head for a collision.
At least there is something some Republicans (not to be confused with conservatives) and Democrats can agree on: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/meta-bans-rt-russian-disinformation-rcna171402
Sorry, I didn’t bother to read your garbage. Waste of time. You pretend to support President Trump, but the real truth is all you Ukes hate him and VP Vance for their peace efforts.
“At least there is something some Republicans (not to be confused with conservatives) and Democrats can agree on: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/meta-bans-rt-russian-disinformation-rcna171402“
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
RT, formerly Russia Today is a Russian state-controlled international news television network funded by the Russian government.
As a conservative, I can’t stand state-controlled media outlets.
“Sorry, I didn’t bother to read your garbage.”
>>>>>>>>>>>>
Why do you say that Trump’s 40 point anti Russia foreign policy list is “garbage”?
Please show some respect for our president.
Hahahaha.
You’re so full of $hit.
Show me one post where YOU complain about French, German, UK or even US state operated media.
Please-
“Right wing media” is not the first type of source that I would think of when looking for information on UFOs. Rolling Stone, Mother Jones, The Globe, Star, and tabloids displayed near the checkout in grocery stores are more what I would think of... along with click bait on YouTube and TikTok.
You merely cherry pick conservative sounding ideas to use when it benefits you, but you’re not really conservative.
Beattie had run Revolver.news, which had lead the conservative media reporting on the alleged J6 RNC/DNC pipe bombs.
“You merely cherry pick conservative sounding ideas to use when it benefits you, but you’re not really conservative.”
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So you assume I’m “not really a conservative” because I have spent years here on FR denouncing the IRAN-RUSSIA-NORTH KOREA-CHINA Alliance?
These regimes have never been America’s friends — they are hostile powers aligned against our interests, our values and our allies.
Iran is the heartbeat of radical Islam. It bankrolls terror groups like Hamas and Hezbollah, who relentlessly target our Israeli allies. And let’s be clear: Iran isn’t just stirring chaos in the Middle East (and helping the Houthies) - it’s arming Russia and its pro-Russian partners while pushing a nuclear agenda that threatens global stability.
Russia? A tyrannical regime then, a tyrannical regime now. Ronald Reagan showed us how to confront this absolute menace during the Cold War — with strength, clarity, and zero compromise. Russia today stands shoulder to shoulder with Iran, backing the same terrorist proxies and propping up Iran’s nuclear ambitions. These regimes aren’t just partners — they’re co-conspirators, locked in an indecent embrace of mutual hate for the West.
North Korea is no different. It’s a brutal communist dictatorship, now actively sending thousands of troops to aid Neo-Soviet Russia in its invasion of sovereign European land. Their role in this modern Axis is no longer just theoretical — it’s boots-on-the-ground treachery.
Together, these three nations form a new Axis of Tyranny: Islamism. Neo-Sovietism. Communism.
Each one is a threat. Together, they represent hate and anarchy.
Denouncing radical Islam, confronting Neo Soviet Russian aggression, and rejecting communist oppression isn’t “leftism” — it’s conservative common sense.
I am therefore a conservative.
Again, show me where in all those years that you posted where you criticize US, German, French, UK state run media?
I got it, it’s Russian so anything you can twist into a negative you will.
But at least attempt to stay somewhat consistent.
If you can’t find the wrong in when we do it, the Germans do it, the French do it, the UK does it, but you complain about the Russians doing it, you’re not consistent.
As to conservative: I doubt you really are such.
You are correct, I’m speculating. But based on previous posts, you like big government (as long as your interests are served) and you’re interventionist.
Those are hardly conservative (as in classical Constitutional / the Framer’s views). The folks that wrote the US Constitution pretty much wanted us out of European affairs, to be damn near isolationist, decentralized (state rights / 10th amendment) and with maximum personal liberty (Amendments 1 - 9) and that is all about keeping government small.
Today you have big government interventionist conservatives which really aren’t conservative at all, if conservative is to mean keeping with the spirit of the US Constitution. These are the Bush W., Bolton, Romney, types.
They conflate their religious conservatism with being Constitutionally conservative. They think because they are tough on crime, or support the military, that makes them conservative. Not the case. It does not matter if you see Islam as a threat (which is true), that does not make you conservative.
All you need to know to be a conservative is spelled out in 10 small paragraphs. Start reading amendments 1 - 10 and take them to heart: https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/
“Why do you say that Trump’s 40 point anti Russia foreign policy list is “garbage”?
Please show some respect for our president.”
It’s obvious you cut and pasted it from another source; you didn’t type all that. That makes it garbage. And there you go again with “our” and “we”. We all know who you are, a foreign weirdo. We all know you hate President Trump and VP Vance.
(((PING!)))
To be added to the zeeper follies pinglist, ping me bro... we need laughter!
Love that! 👍
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.