We have at least 12-15 million people here who illegally entered our nation, sneaking across our borders. How is that not an invasion? Regarding 'required' for public safety, I'm sure the family of Laken Riley would differ with your assessment that 'the public safety does not require it'. That's just one of MANY cases (e.g.):
Aleksandre Modebadze, 47, killed <2 weeks ago in his home by 3 illegals;
The case of Francisco Oropesa who had been deported 4 times before killing 5 neighbors, including a 9 year old boy.
The 13 million immigrants convicted of homicide who are now free in the US (ICE data).
The cases of illegal 'migrants' trying to breach US military bases (e.g. Quantico, Twentynine Palms).
These are just some examples. There are many more.
I would also argue that for some within our government who want to 'transform' America, pushing and facilitating rapid demographic shifts via illegal immigration is a form of rebellion against the US.
“How is that not an invasion ??”
I think the legal definition of physical invasion requires both unauthorized entry AND hostile intent.
The argument could and would be made that 90%+ of illegal immigrants do not have hostile intent and therefore could not legally be considered invaders.
Instead of silly and borderline unConstitutional dead ends like arguing about suspending Habeus Corpus, the administration should be heavily investing in ramping up the logistical and judicial resources needed to correctly process illegal immigrants and to deport those who cannot justify being allowed to stay.