“Just how is it that The Law is not easily understood and that all legal beagles don’t come readily to the same conclusion?”
Because some reach their conclusion based upon the parties of the case and what they want to be true, and not according to laws and the Constitution.
I just read the D.C. court’s ruling and it is pretty solid. I didn’t bother reading the dissent because a) it’s longer than the decision itself (which is just 13 pages, and b) it is by Judge Pillard who was going to rule against the Trump administration no matter what the issue.
“Because some reach their conclusion based upon the parties of the case and what they want to be true, and not according to laws and the Constitution.”
Are you saying that The Law is a Donkey?