Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Government drops Maude criminal charges following ranchers’, elected representatives’ plea to secretary Brooke Rollins
Tri-State livestock news ^ | 4/29/25 | Rachel Spencer Gabel

Posted on 04/29/2025 11:20:10 AM PDT by CFW

Ranchers and their elected representatives have won a major battle. The federal government dropped criminal charges against Charles and Heather Maude of Caputa, SD.

Ben Patterson, Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Federal District Court in the Western Division of South Dakota signed a motion to dismiss the indictment against Charles Maude and Heather Maude, dated April 28.

South Dakota ranchers Charles and Heather Maude were indicted separately nearly a year ago on charges of theft of federal property stemming from a fenceline dispute about a fence built before either were born.

Wyoming Congresswoman Harriet Hageman is pleased with the news of the dismissal. “I’m excited for the Maudes. I’m very pleased that we were able to get this resolved for them and that the Trump administration and Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins has taken this so seriously.”

The Republican Congresswoman said the U.S. Forest Service employee’s actions last spring were designed to send a very strong message to livestock producers that the agency “was not necessarily their friends.”

(Excerpt) Read more at tsln.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; US: South Dakota
KEYWORDS: federallands; federalproperty; fence; forestservice; government; harassment; maude; overreach; persecution; southdakota; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
Here is a link to an FR thread from a couple of weeks ago.

New Trial Date for Charles and Heather Maude

Sometimes elections have positive consequences for the little guy. Good for Sec Rollins in correcting this travesty.

1 posted on 04/29/2025 11:20:10 AM PDT by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CFW

Background:

What happened?

“As it was reported in Tri-State Livestock News and The Fence Post Magazine, on March 29, 2024, Special Agent Lunders and U.S. Forest Service Patrol Captain Jeff Summers told the Maudes they received a complaint from a hunter a no trespassing sign was posted on a fence not built upon the correct boundary. The Maudes removed the sign from the fence, which was built sometime prior to the 1950s. The family owned their property adjacent to the U.S. Forest Service-managed Buffalo Gap National Grasslands (BGNG) since 1910.

The fence, built sometime between 1910 and 1950, was accepted as the property boundary by the USDA annually through the certification of acres by the USDA Farm Service Agency every year since the National Grasslands came into existence in 1960.

The Maudes met on May 1 with Special Agent Lunders and USFS District Ranger Julie Wheeler. The conclusion reached that day was a land survey would be needed first and foremost and that would take time, up to a year according to Wheeler. The Maudes scheduled a meeting at the allotment so the District Ranger could see the fence and move toward a resolution. Five days later, Lunders again arrived — and entered private property — with a survey crew to complete a survey the Maudes were not a party to. Neither a copy of the survey nor a copy of the original complaint allegedly issued by a hunter has been made available.

U.S. Forest Service Special Agent Travis Lunders arrived unannounced at the Maudes’ home on June 24, 2024, armed and in tactical gear, to serve the couple with separate federal indictments. The indictments were for the alleged theft of government property stemming from the placement of a fence built at least 75 years ago. The Maudes each faced 10 years in prison and $250,000 in fines over the 50 acres in question and were ordered not to speak to one another about the case.”


2 posted on 04/29/2025 11:24:02 AM PDT by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Sorry...First thing that popped into my head. 😜

3 posted on 04/29/2025 11:25:29 AM PDT by fidelis (Ecce Crucem Domini! Fugite partes adversae! Vicit Leo de tribu Juda, Radix David! Alleluia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

The Forest Service is not to be trusted with any power.... experience here in New Mexico has taught us they shouldn’t be trusted with matches either.


4 posted on 04/29/2025 11:28:25 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW
the placement of a fence built at least 75 years ago.

Given repeated government acceptance of the fence, it would seem that adverse possession would apply.

5 posted on 04/29/2025 11:29:02 AM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fidelis

https://youtu.be/lWUD7MBdDuo?si=OlVWmi2mpdqObO3k


6 posted on 04/29/2025 11:29:43 AM PDT by wally_bert (I cannot be sure for certain, but in my personal opinion I am certain that I am not sure..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CFW

“were ordered not to speak to one another about the case”

He would have gotten a big FU.


7 posted on 04/29/2025 11:35:48 AM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Is this clown still working and carrying a weapon?


8 posted on 04/29/2025 11:36:28 AM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CFW

that’s how liberal democrat progressive bass tards do business...they search and search for any tiny little thing to SCREW a American citizens but just try to do them justice and the American citizens get SCREWED again. and again. and again. what will it take to finally take the government agents and agencies to task for their war against American citizens who just want justice?


9 posted on 04/29/2025 11:37:13 AM PDT by Qwapisking ("The left will rue the day they cheated Trump out of the 2020 election forever" L.Star )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Can they sue U.S. Forest Service Special Agent Travis Lunders. Maybe take away his tactile queer gear?


10 posted on 04/29/2025 11:37:20 AM PDT by chuckb87
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CFW

I hope Agent Lunders is fired or transferred to Florida to invasive python patrol.


11 posted on 04/29/2025 11:42:24 AM PDT by Valpal1 (Not even the police are safe from the police!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CFW
U.S. Forest Service Special Agent Travis Lunders

There's a big problem right there. Why weren't US Marshals used, and why do agencies get to have their own police forces to enforce their own writs? What judge signed off on this travesty, if any?

I guess they're lucky they didn't get the Ruby Ridge treatment.

12 posted on 04/29/2025 11:46:26 AM PDT by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Pam Bondi haters. Cowardly Crickets today.


13 posted on 04/29/2025 11:47:25 AM PDT by Old West Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW
The Republican Congresswoman said the U.S. Forest Service employee’s actions last spring were designed to send a very strong message to livestock producers that the agency “was not necessarily their friends.”

Wayne Hage got that message over 35 years ago.

14 posted on 04/29/2025 12:05:08 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The tree of liberty needs a rope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

the left hate ranchers

you know

the whole cow meat thing


15 posted on 04/29/2025 12:37:34 PM PDT by joshua c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW
“This was a rogue employee that wanted to make an example of the Maudes.

I hope the administration has made an example of the rogue employee. Boundary disputes are a civil matter settled by proper surveys.

16 posted on 04/29/2025 12:48:44 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW
ordered not to speak to one another about the case

Sounds like some feral gubmint lawyers need to be made an example of too.

17 posted on 04/29/2025 12:50:58 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

“I hope the administration has made an example of the rogue employee. Boundary disputes are a civil matter settled by proper surveys.”


Unless, of course, your administration has a deep hatred for ranchers as the Biden handlers did. Then you find reasons to make it a federal criminal case. The Maudes should have, in a proper free nation, a case against the federal government for violations of their Constitutional rights.


18 posted on 04/29/2025 12:53:01 PM PDT by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Sure, I hope the Maudes have a path to attain restitution. But Trump needs to keep taking out the trash, hauling it away in garbage trucks and burning it.


19 posted on 04/29/2025 12:59:02 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: fidelis
First thing that came to my mind..


20 posted on 04/29/2025 1:05:12 PM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson