Posted on 04/16/2025 10:10:07 AM PDT by ebb tide
Bishop Joseph E. Strickland issued a public statement today in support of Baby Elaine Wren, an infant currently hospitalized in Texas and dependent on a breathing apparatus. Despite her family’s desire to continue life-sustaining treatment, the hospital may soon withdraw care under the authority of the Texas Advance Directives Act (TADA), commonly known as the “25-day rule.”
READ: Texas hospital may end baby’s life against parents’ wishes
“This policy violates the moral law and the dignity of the human person,” said Bishop Strickland. “It is not within the rightful authority of any committee to determine that a life is not worth continuing, especially when the patient is not actively dying and the care being provided is ordinary and proportionate.”
TADA allows hospital ethics committees to unilaterally end life-sustaining care ten days after giving written notice, even over the objections of the patient’s family. Bishop Strickland called this a “quiet injustice” and urged lawmakers to reform the law.
“The Church teaches that every human life, no matter how small, sick, or dependent, is made in the image of God and must be protected. To withdraw care from a living child against the wishes of her parents is unconscionable,” he said.
Bishop Strickland also references similar cases – like that of Tinslee Lewis – and warned that Baby Elaine’s situation is part of a troubling pattern. “These are not isolated tragedies. Texas law must change to ensure that vulnerable patients are protected, not abandoned.”
The bishop concluded by expressing solidarity with Elaine’s family: “You are not alone. The Church stands with you. We support your right to protect your daughter’s life and to seek treatment that honors her dignity.”
Read Strickland’s full statement below:
Dear Faithful of Christ, and all people of goodwill,
With a heavy heart, I write to you concerning a matter that strikes at the heart of human dignity and the sacredness of every human life – a matter unfolding in our own state of Texas.
An infant girl, Elaine Wren, lies in a Texas hospital, her small body supported by a breathing apparatus that sustains her fragile life. Her parents, driven by love and faith, desire to continue caring for her, to give her every chance to live. But they are now facing a grave threat – not from her illness alone, but from a law in our own land.
The Texas Advance Directives Act (TADA), also known as the “25-day rule,” permits hospital ethics committees to unilaterally decide to withdraw life-sustaining treatment, even over the objections of the patient’s family. Once notice is given, the family has 10 days to transfer the patient before care may be withdrawn. This puts an impossible burden on families – both emotionally and logistically – and has led, in more than one instance, to the death of vulnerable patients, including infants and children.
As a bishop of the Catholic Church, I must speak clearly: this policy violates the moral law and the dignity of the human person. It is not within the rightful authority of any hospital committee or legislative body to determine that a life is not worth continuing, especially when that life is sustained by ordinary means and when the patient is not actively dying.
The Catechism of the Catholic Church teaches:
Whatever its motives and means, direct euthanasia consists in putting an end to the lives of handicapped, sick, or dying persons. It is morally unacceptable. (CCC 2277)
And also:
Discontinuing medical procedures that are burdensome, dangerous, extraordinary, or disproportionate to the expected outcome can be legitimate … But one does not will to cause death. (CCC 2278)
In Baby Elaine’s case, we are not speaking of extraordinary or disproportionate means, but of a basic form of life support – something which can be rightly considered ordinary and morally obligatory if it offers hope of sustaining life without undue burden.
Moreover, the decision to remove treatment against the will of loving parents contradicts not only Catholic teaching but basic principles of parental rights and the proper role of medical care. Parents are the primary caretakers and decision-makers for their children – not ethics committees governed by institutional protocols or resource management concerns.
This is not an isolated tragedy. Other children – such as Tinslee Lewis and others – have been placed in similar peril under this law. And unless there is a firm outcry from people of faith and conscience, this quiet injustice will continue to claim the lives of the voiceless.
I urge lawmakers in Texas to revisit this law and restore a presumption in favor of life, particularly when families desire continued treatment. I urge medical professionals to honor the Hippocratic oath and the dignity of every patient. I urge all people of faith to pray and advocate for Baby Elaine and for all vulnerable patients threatened by this policy.
To Elaine’s family: you are not alone. The Church stands with you. We support your right to protect your daughter’s life and your desire to do all you can for her well-being.
To the faithful: let us not grow weary in defending life. Let us be the voice for those who have none. And may we never forget that every life, no matter how brief or frail, bears the image of God and is infinitely precious in His eyes.
All the other Texas Frankenbishops are more concerned about fighting Trump on his protection of our southern border against illegal invaders.
Ping
Francis has purged all real Catholics from leadership.
There are NO ETHICS in hospital ethics committees and never have been.
This is all about the dough.
There is not a bottomless pit of gold to support these kids, as I suspect this is a Medicaid case. Hard to say, given this is a sob story - lacking any real detail.
BYW - no GoFundMe?
Thanks to abortion and liberals, we have “advanced” to a society that is anxious to kill. Who or what is harmed by keeping this blessed being going? Prayers to Saint Terri.
If that’s the case re medicaid, no better example exists of the fallacy of government run single payer health care. Flawed humans doling out limited funds will invariably harm the most vulnerable and needy.
Many Texas bishops are involved with Texas Right to Life, such as the bishops in Dallas, Fort Worth, El Paso, Laredo and Lubbock ... just to name a few.
However ... the dioceses have been known to contradict themselves or their actions. The Texas Catholic Conference of Catholic Bishops has urged parishioners not to be involved with Texas Right to Life. Mind boggling.
Good for +Strickland. Where are the other Bishops?
No, there’s only a bottomless pit of gold for illegal aliens and criminals.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.