Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: iamgalt

You might want to do a bit more research.

The administration has been very busy—taking thousands and thousands of specific actions.

The courts have looked at a relative handful of them.

The court activity makes a lot of headlines—but it is important to keep it in proper perspective.

More than 95% of the administration activity is moving along right on schedule.

The way to do the research is to focus on one federal agency at a time.

Make a list of every action they have taken—and see how many of those have actually been affected by court activities.

You can do that by going to the agency web site and looking through the administration press releases.

Anecdote time: I was getting my haircut done today. The lady cutting my hair had a relative laid off from a federal agency in Atlanta (not CDC—not sure which one). They were given several weeks notice and were fired. They are gone. No court activity. Just gone.


8 posted on 03/20/2025 5:16:41 PM PDT by cgbg (It was not us. It was them--all along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: cgbg

As far as I know, the only case against firings so far, besides the agency heads serving set terms, is probationary employees, who can only be fired for cause, rather than just because they’re probationary. A general RIF is OK, however, which can presumably include some probies. You just can’t target probies specifically for a layoff.


22 posted on 03/21/2025 3:43:40 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (FBI out of Florida!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson