Posted on 03/18/2025 6:58:02 AM PDT by hardspunned
I said this today, like merchant, his daughter is wrapped up in this rat agenda as well. They are all on the same page
Simply, the judge got out-lawyered. While he ordered that the plane be turned around orally from the bench, the court's minute notes simply say that "Defendants shall not remove any of the individual Plaintiffs from the United States for 14 days absent further Order of the Court..."(See Dkt. No. 9, J.G.G.v Trump 1:25-cv-00766, DCC, for those of you with access to PACER). By the time that note was entered, the airplane was already outside of the United States, or as Bukele said "Oopsee"
The judge expected his oral order to be obeyed, because in his experience they typically are, but oral orders are not appealable, and the court's minute notes control. Rage against Trump as much as he may, the judge cannot legitimately find that Trump is in contempt for not turning the plane around because he did not express that in the court's notes.
They have not fully scrubbed her off the Internet yet:
https://www.partnersforjustice.org/team-members/katharine-boasberg
“She/her
Katharine assists the national team with its growing body of capacity building work in public defender offices across the nation”
President Trump is immune from prosecution for official acts—so ruled by the Supreme Court.
Thanks for playing.
Sorry Kat. It lives forever on the Internet.
WHO IS FUNDING HER 501c3???
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
USAID?
From their website...
“How it works
Partners for Justice provides collaborative support services to people facing criminal charges, while helping public defenders protect people from incarceration and other criminal penalties.
Learn more about what we do ›
1
We embed specialty-trained teams within public defender offices to meet housing, employment, educational, health and mental health needs for clients.
2
We build capacity for public defender offices through resources and collaboration.
3
We create and distribute resources to public defender offices in our network.”
I’d like to know how much government money this NGO gets.
Of course.
Why is he defaming John Roberts already? Let the process work itself through.The process is the punishment.
Unless the Chief Justice steps in and slaps these activist judges down, the scenario will continue. Countless decisions/actions made by the POTUS will be delayed thru restraining orders and litigation.
The elements behind all this know they won't win...they just want to play out the clock until DJT's term is over.
If Justice Roberts stays on the sidelines, they might achieve their goal.
Closing the paddock and barn doors after the horse got loose and ran away, isn’t an effective way to make the horse go home.
Has anyone appealed to him yet? I don’t think so.
Bttt.
5.56mm
All the years of following the networks, rulings, relationships and details is starting to surface as important. The notoriously corrupt DC Judge James Boasberg is now in the big ugly spotlight.
President Trump calls for Judge Boasberg to be impeached.
Supreme Court Justice John Roberts immediately jumps into action to defend his friend and colleague.
The reason is the relationship between him and Boasberg.
WASHINGTON – “For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose,” Roberts said Tuesday in a rare and brief statement issued just hours after Trump publicly joined demands by his supporters to remove judges he called “crooked.”
John Roberts appointed Boasberg to be presiding judge of the FISA court after Judge Rosemary Collyer’s term was over. In the aftermath of the DOJ manipulating the FISA court to attack President Trump, Chief Justice Roberts needed Boasberg to protect the FISC. As a result, Boasberg sat at the epicenter of some of the worst DC judicial decisions ever. Including the precedent of forcing VP Mike Pence to testify in a grand jury against the accused, President Donald Trump.
Simultaneously, Boasberg did everything he could to fulfill his commitment to Roberts, even appointing Mary McCord, wife of Roberts’ senior staff Sheldon Snook, to be amicus to the court. {GO DEEP}
Yes, Roberts will protect Boasberg, because Boasberg -who Roberts appointed to be presiding judge of the FISC- has major leverage over Roberts.
Boasberg has assembled his shields over years, and CTH has outlined every step. The brutally obvious began surfacing when Boasberg appointed *Mary McCord as amicus to the FISC.
McCord’s husband, Sheldon Snook, was the key staff of Roberts and almost certainly the leaker of the Dobbs decision. Chief Justice Roberts had to hide that reality (which he did after the US Marshal investigation) because it put the leak inside his office.
Boasberg knows this (and other stuff) and Roberts reacts to eyes on Boasberg from a defensive posture.
Yes.
Geesh...come on, man!! It's like deciphering the Rosetta Stone with some of these posts.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.