Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WATCH: This Is the Strongest Case for Trump's Tariffs I've Heard Yet
PJ Media ^ | 03/16/2025 | Matt Margolis

Posted on 03/16/2025 4:36:24 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

Donald Trump’s tariff policies remain a lightning rod for debate. Democrats are sounding the alarm, warning of dire economic fallout and painting a picture of looming catastrophe.

Batya Ungar-Sargon, deputy opinion editor of Newsweek, made one of the strongest, most effective cases yet for former President Donald Trump’s tariffs during the latest episode of “Real Time with Bill Maher.” She broke down exactly why these tariffs are necessary, and by the end, she left Bill Maher flustered.

Ungar-Sargon’s explanation couldn’t have been clearer: manufacturing jobs and economic nationalism are crucial for the American middle class.

When the conversation turned to the economy of the 1970s, Ungar-Sargon wasted no time explaining why so many Americans look back on that era with nostalgia. “In the ‘70s, the largest share of our GDP was in the middle class,” she said. “And that was not separate from the fact that 25% of our economy was in manufacturing.”

Maher sought clarification, asking if that meant “most of what was produced came from the middle, and now it comes from the rich.”

“Now, the top 20% controls over 50% of the GDP,” Ungar-Sargon confirmed, highlighting how economic power has been funneled away from the working class. “That manufacturing is still being done; it’s just being done in other countries.”

Maher interjected, noting that the jobs have moved overseas for “wages we will not work for.”

This, of course, is true, but it also proved Ungar-Sargon’s point.

“Yes, that’s exactly right. You’re right, Bill,” Ungar-Sargon responded. “That’s what the tariffs are for. They are to make American workers more competitive in the global market.” She then challenged the defeatist attitude that has allowed China to dominate industries once vital to the American workforce. “Why are we accepting that there should be a race to the bottom?

(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: security; tariffs

1 posted on 03/16/2025 4:36:24 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
HERE's ONE THING TO CONSIDER: NATIONAL SECURITY

She laid out Trump’s argument for protecting key industries, explaining that his trade policies aren’t just about economics but national security.

“Trump says there are five industries that we cannot have any kind of national security without having a stake in them—pharmaceuticals, lumber, steel, aluminum,” she said, adding that she had momentarily forgotten the fifth.

“These are really important, that we have a stake in the manufacturing of the things that we need as a nation. So that when China decides that it wants to go to war against us, we’re not relying on them for steel and aluminum in order to fight them.”
2 posted on 03/16/2025 4:38:02 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Worth the watch.

Good but not great.


3 posted on 03/16/2025 4:47:22 PM PDT by ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton (You can vote totalitarians in but you can never vote them out...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Yes, I was just going to write that. A strong and healthy manufacturing sector with experienced manufacturing managers and execs is vital to our security.


4 posted on 03/16/2025 4:48:31 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (Democrats who say ‘no one is above the law’ won’t mind going to prison for the money they stole)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

This makes me wonder why someone doesn’t do these 2-5 minute videos and have Musk, Trump and others post them to their accounts.

Of course, leftists still wouldn’t see them but a 5 minute video explaining TdA’s deportation or tariffs would get 100’s of millions views, and go a long way to getting the our side of the arguments out there.


5 posted on 03/16/2025 4:52:23 PM PDT by ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton (You can vote totalitarians in but you can never vote them out...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I’m thinking the 5th industrial pillar for national security would be energy.


6 posted on 03/16/2025 4:53:14 PM PDT by mund1011 (We can ignore reality, but we cannot ignore the consequences of ignoring reality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“...former President Donald Trump...”
???


7 posted on 03/16/2025 5:00:44 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th (Get out of the matrix and get a real life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mund1011
> I’m thinking the 5th industrial pillar for national security would be energy.

Actually its the first.
Cheap, abundant, reliable energy is the foundation of a nation's economy and its national defense.

8 posted on 03/16/2025 5:15:44 PM PDT by SecondAmendment (The history of the present Federal Government is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

semiconductor chips.


9 posted on 03/16/2025 5:17:27 PM PDT by 2Dreamin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Ok. I’m going to go off for a bit, but I’m not going to engage replies:

THIS.

Coming from someone @ newsweak is, well, a shocker. But it won’t matter. The left won’t be convinced. Period. The center? Well, they’re the true turncoats. At least the hard left has the cajones to stand true to their beliefs and not waffle every other election. That includes some republicans.

For DECADES I’ve been at odds with republicans - so-called ‘faux Conservatives’ - who held the ‘free trade’ banner high, ignoring the simple fact that it was more than bad trade policy which moved manufacturing jobs to cheaper labor:

Due to the federal spending problem, if manufacturing costs weren’t managed, the political class took it on the chin with high inflation. In the wake of the oil crisis & the peanut farmer, they got in bed with the corporatists, promised board salaries etc. and - in part - the game was on. It is the status quo. In plain sight. It’s a travesty. Corruption is a core issue still unresolved. Insider trading is but a symptom.

Yes, the idiot class is wrong about tariffs bringing higher prices: Bringing those jobs home will. It’s unavoidable, but manageable with a stronger economy if we address the other core issue:

We STILL have a spending crisis, and a financial crash is still a possibility.

They can cut all they want via DOGE, but POTUS seriously undermined reversing the status quo by supporting the CR.

It was a trap, and he fell for it hook, line & sinker. I’d hoped he vetted his advisors this time around. That’s strike 2. Now I wonder what’s coming next, the stupid mistake that will invigorate the left and bring us a return to decline in ‘28, having wasted all that momentum to transform government & the economy. NO MORE CRs.

I’m still grateful for DJT’s return, so it would be egregiously wrong to attack me for righteous critique. We need to codify changes, begin to address the congresscritter problem and produce a workable budget WHILE they do all the rest of it which is currently making headlines (assuming that ds lets any of that happen).

As I’ve written prior, I do hold hope...

...but my other hand is filling up fast. I demand MORE, but I’m not Pollyanna: I am Cynicus.

IMHO

[rant over]


10 posted on 03/16/2025 5:21:11 PM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

How many FReepers are old enough to remember when one or more members of families - even neighbors - were working in factories? My family were farmers but relatives who were not, worked in factories. Where I was born and raised, it was IBM, NCR/Allen Wales, Morse Chain, American LaFrance. My brother worked in a factory for 40 years after his military service (late ‘40’s) before retiring.


11 posted on 03/16/2025 5:22:42 PM PDT by Thank You Rush ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SecondAmendment

Actually its the first.

+++++++++

Don’t disagree. 4 of the 5 pillars were identified and I simply provided the missing pillar. Nothing happens without energy. Easily #1.


12 posted on 03/16/2025 6:04:27 PM PDT by mund1011 (We can ignore reality, but we cannot ignore the consequences of ignoring reality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Thank You Rush

My dad made rubber products, mom made car wiring, aunt stamped metal parts, and my brother made blue jeans. None of those companies are around anymore.


13 posted on 03/16/2025 6:13:06 PM PDT by jimpick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mund1011

That’s a good addition. I was thinking of chip making.


14 posted on 03/16/2025 6:30:48 PM PDT by super7man (Madam Defarge, knitting, knitting, always knitting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

“Why are we accepting that there should be a race to the bottom? You know, China, what is its competitive advantage over us? It’s that it pays slave wages. Why should we accept that?”


15 posted on 03/16/2025 7:13:36 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: logi_cal869
Mass produced goods are cheap no matter where they are produced. It is degrees of cheapness. The same product made in China vs the USA price is almost the same. On average the cost of labor for a manufactured good is <8% in the USA and <5% in China. The difference is pennies on the dollar. We need to make it here!!!
16 posted on 03/16/2025 7:18:20 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Consider the increased costs to transport from China or from other countries and US manufacturing costs should not be greater. With increased use of robotics, less reliance a manpower many products should cost about the same anywhere. US should have an advantage with energy costs given the abundant supply of energy resources. Regulatory impediments to manufacturing are also declining in US under Trump.


17 posted on 03/16/2025 7:41:45 PM PDT by grumpygresh ( Civil disobedience by non-compliance; jury and state nullification.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mund1011

They’re all important and necessary. Reminds me of an old joke.

The various parts of the body were arguing about who was the most important. The lungs said they were the most important, we need oxygen to live. The heart said it’s me, I pump the blood containing the oxygen. The brain said it’s me, none of this works without me. The butt quietly clamped shut, winning the argument.


18 posted on 03/16/2025 7:51:53 PM PDT by Tymesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jimpick

YEP - that’s the way it was. I forgot to include Remington Rand as a factory where relatives worked...also Eclipse, a division of Bendix Aviation...both of those in Elmira, NY


19 posted on 03/17/2025 6:09:27 AM PDT by Thank You Rush ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson