Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

This 70-year-old woman is serving 9 years in prison for identifying the unauthorized destruction of voter information
American Thinker ^ | 03/12/2025 | Joe Fried

Posted on 03/13/2025 8:55:41 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Tina Peters was once the Clerk and Recorder of Mesa County, Colorado, and was in charge of county elections. Now she is serving a nine-year term in a Colorado prison. Her crime? She identified the unauthorized destruction of voter information that took place in two consecutive county elections: the November 2020 election and a local election held in early 2021.

In each case, there is irrefutable evidence showing that the election database had been removed and subsequently reinstalled, minus information needed to identify the voter intent of thousands of ballots.

Peters, who is a matronly gold star mother, was concerned after three conservatives lost in a local election, despite the county having far more Republicans than Democrats. Due to a pending software update, the election database would soon be altered. For that reason, Peters asked her IT department to make a backup copy of the database.

When they refused, Peters decided to take independent action. That action involved legal infractions that gave Colorado and local officials the excuse they needed to wage despicable lawfare. Here is the background.

Tina Peters asked an outside computer technician to make a database copy, and that copy ended up in the hands of two established IT experts. (It is not clear who gave it to them.) After the experts examined the database in minute detail, they issued an 87-page technical report with shocking revelations that have never been refuted.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: augustoknowswhattodo; colorado; dirtyjena; dirtyjenagriswold; dirtyjenathecommie; goldstarmother; jail; jenagriswold; jenathecommie; joefried; patriottina; peters; pinochetairlines; statementofinterest; tina; tinapeters; tinathepatriot; voterfraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

1 posted on 03/13/2025 8:55:41 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Here is an excerpt from the report, which was prepared by Walter Daugherity and Jeffrey O’Donnell:

See here:

https://www.chescounited.org/post/forensic-analysis-of-the-mesa-county-colorado-election-management-system

[EXCERPT]

There was an unauthorized creation of new election databases during early voting in the 2020 General Election on October 21, 2020, followed by the digital reloading of 20,346 ballot records into the new election databases, making the original voter intent recorded from the ballots unknown. In addition, 5,567 ballots in 58 batches did not have their digital records copied to the new database, although the votes from the ballots in those batches were recorded in the Main election database.

[END EXCERPT]

So, For granting “unauthorized access” to the database, Tina Peters was indicted on March 9, 2022 on a slew of overlapping charges. The felony charges include attempting to influence a public servant, identity theft, criminal impersonation, and conspiracy to commit criminal impersonation. The misdemeanors include first-degree official misconduct, violation of duty, and failure to comply with the requirements of the secretary of state.

The county district attorney, Dan Rubinstein, did not dispute a single point in the 87-page technical report, and he even acknowledged that “[f]urther investigation would be required to determine if...election records as required by statute” are gone forever.


2 posted on 03/13/2025 8:57:04 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

There should be a tree in the future of “Dirty Jena”...


3 posted on 03/13/2025 8:59:33 AM PDT by kiryandil (No one in AZ that voted for Trump voted for Gallego )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Where is our DOJ on this B/S? This women should be released immediately and compensated for her time spent. Also ,put her back in charge.


4 posted on 03/13/2025 9:00:35 AM PDT by spincaster (ifi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spincaster

At minimum a Presidential pardon.


5 posted on 03/13/2025 9:01:47 AM PDT by grobdriver (The CDC can KMA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: spincaster; grobdriver
Dirty Jena the Commie made sure it was a "state matter", so's the phony "charges" couldn't be pardoned by President Trump.

Our DOJ47 has filed a "statement of interest" in the case, probably related to violations of Tina Peters' civil rights at the federal level.

6 posted on 03/13/2025 9:05:03 AM PDT by kiryandil (No one in AZ that voted for Trump voted for Gallego )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: george76

Dirty Jena ping


7 posted on 03/13/2025 9:05:50 AM PDT by kiryandil (No one in AZ that voted for Trump voted for Gallego )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

But can he commute state sentences?


8 posted on 03/13/2025 9:09:18 AM PDT by Get Daddy a Beer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

So no whistle blower protections in Colorado?


9 posted on 03/13/2025 9:12:18 AM PDT by TheDon (Remember the J6 political prisoners! Remember Ashli Babbitt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Get Daddy a Beer; spincaster; grobdriver
But can he commute state sentences?

No.

What they CAN do is examine the case in light of federal civil rights violations by the lying Commies who prosecuted Tina Peters.

10 posted on 03/13/2025 9:12:22 AM PDT by kiryandil (No one in AZ that voted for Trump voted for Gallego )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Where is our DOJ on this B/S? This women should be released immediately and compensated for her time spent. Also ,put her back in charge.


11 posted on 03/13/2025 9:12:32 AM PDT by spincaster (ifi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grobdriver

Yes.. I don’t understand why she hasn’t already been pardoned - or is it a state vs federal thing?


12 posted on 03/13/2025 9:12:33 AM PDT by enumerated (81 million votes my ass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: spincaster; grobdriver; Get Daddy a Beer; TheDon; enumerated

regarding the DOJ47 “statement of interest”:

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/25550138-peters-ps-v-feyen-statement-of-interest/


13 posted on 03/13/2025 9:14:26 AM PDT by kiryandil (No one in AZ that voted for Trump voted for Gallego )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: grobdriver

> At minimum a Presidential pardon. <

I wish. But a president can only pardon federal crimes. From what I can tell, Tina Peters was convicted of state crimes. Only the governor can pardon her.


14 posted on 03/13/2025 9:14:39 AM PDT by Leaning Right (It’s morning in America. Again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: grobdriver

She faced state charges, which can’t be undone by presidential pardon. It would take a governor’s pardon, but, he’s a commie so that isn’t going to happen. However, what could happen is that everyone involved in her prosecution/persecution could face federal charges, in addition to those involved in the election malfeasance that she documented also facing federal charges. There are probably some other things the feds could do - which I don’t know why they’re not doing.


15 posted on 03/13/2025 9:16:35 AM PDT by coloradan (They're not the mainstream media, they're the gaslight media. It's what they do. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

Thanks. I knew there were some options available. Especially with blue state persecutions.


16 posted on 03/13/2025 9:16:46 AM PDT by Get Daddy a Beer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The fed could make it interesting by taking Jena Griswold to court and calling Tina Peters to testify.


17 posted on 03/13/2025 9:18:44 AM PDT by ryderann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheDon
So no whistle blower protections in Colorado?

The Commies running The Peoples' Republic of Colorado are pretending that she didn't blow the whistle on clear violations of Colorado election law.

This is what happens when Uncle Augusto isn't allowed to clean this stuff up with free helicopter rides for the perps.


18 posted on 03/13/2025 9:18:56 AM PDT by kiryandil (No one in AZ that voted for Trump voted for Gallego )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

Our DOJ47 has filed a “statement of interest” in the case, probably related to violations of Tina Peters’ civil rights at the federal level.


That ‘statement of interest’ needs to be converted into statement of action ....

I want to see daily updates of just what, exactly, the DOJ is working on ... that doesn’t effect NatSec.

Maybe this is why POTUS is visiting the DoJ, tomorrow. To see some action, or, at least status of action items.


19 posted on 03/13/2025 9:19:24 AM PDT by Jane Long (Jesus is Lord!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ryderann

Like the way you think!


20 posted on 03/13/2025 9:20:06 AM PDT by Jane Long (Jesus is Lord!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson