Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Treasury Department Suspends Enforcement of BOI and Corporate Transparency Act
CPA Practise Advisor ^ | 03-03-2025 | Isaac M. O'Bannon

Posted on 03/02/2025 9:23:29 PM PST by MNJohnnie

The Treasury Department announced March 2 that it will no longer enforce the Corporate Transparency Act or the associated Beneficial Ownership Information reporting requirements.

Furthermore, the agency announced that, “Not only will it not enforce any penalties or fines associated with the beneficial ownership information reporting rule under the existing regulatory deadlines, but it will further not enforce any penalties or fines against U.S. citizens or domestic reporting companies or their beneficial owners after the forthcoming rule changes take effect either.”

The Treasury Department said it will further be issuing a proposed rule that will narrow the scope of the rule to foreign reporting companies only.

“This is a victory for common sense,” said U.S. Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent. “Today’s action is part of President Trump’s bold agenda to unleash American prosperity by reining in burdensome regulations, in particular for small businesses that are the backbone of the American economy.”

The Corporate Transparency Act, which was signed into law in January 2021, is an anti-money laundering law that directs businesses to report their ownership structures to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), which is overseen by the Treasury Department. The thinking is that clear ownership structures make it more difficult for bad actors to use shell companies for illicit activities like money laundering or drug trafficking.

A Jan. 1, 2025, deadline had originally been set for reporting companies to file their BOI reports with FinCEN, but that deadline has been delayed and suspended numerous times by federal courts.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: adeyemo; awinfortraffickers; cleanup; drugdealersunite; drugdealerswinning; fincen; nigerian; privacy; reporting; smallbusiness; trump; wallyadeyemo; winning
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last
SO MUCH WINNING!
1 posted on 03/02/2025 9:23:29 PM PST by MNJohnnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
There was a good reason for the basic idea. Where the whole thing falls down is in the implementation and "requirement" specification. It at the same time went too far and not far enough.

Another poor law passed by the Democratic Congress and signed by a Democratic pResident.

2 posted on 03/02/2025 9:29:58 PM PST by asinclair (It's too bad there will never be a RICO indictment of the DNC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Good.


3 posted on 03/02/2025 9:35:01 PM PST by NoLibZone (Scary that a party can "run" a candidate that doesn't feel any need to campaign.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: asinclair

It was just another pain in the ass time waster whilst those intent on laundering money could easily find ten ways around it.


4 posted on 03/02/2025 9:36:39 PM PST by bigbob (Yes. We ARE going back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

For sure…. how much more WINNING can my old heart stand!


5 posted on 03/02/2025 9:39:56 PM PST by House Atreides (I’m now ULTRA-MAGA-PRO-M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Does this include the Biden requirement for banks to report to the IRS every transaction of $600?


6 posted on 03/02/2025 9:57:50 PM PST by mass55th (“Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway.” ― John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mass55th

... at the same time that the government has made trillions of dollars of untraceable transactions, without any accountability. Hypocrites!


7 posted on 03/02/2025 10:06:20 PM PST by coloradan (They're not the mainstream media, they're the gaslight media. It's what they do. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: All
Biden's Treasury made $4.7 trillions tax dollars in untraceable transactions,
without any accountability.

Who cashed the checks?

Official govt portrait of Biden Treasury hire, Nigerian Wally Adeyemo. Adeyemo abruptly quit Treasury when Trump came in. Ademeyo refused to handover documents chronicling his Treasury activities wrt $4.7 trillion in Treasury payments. Earlier, the Nigerian headed “Obama’s Foundation” which soon made Obama “a billionaire.” Is this why Obama won’t discuss his Foundation finances?


8 posted on 03/02/2025 10:17:44 PM PST by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: All

Nigerian Wally Adeyomo, Biden’s US Treasury hire is
an experienced Democrat and more than proved his worth.

Nigerian born Wally (Wale) Adeyemo is now the new Deputy Secretary of the United States Treasury, following his confirmation by the Senate. The U.S. Mission in Nigeria announced his confirmation on Friday, said Wally was one of the spectacular personalities and first Nigerian African to assume the position. He was born in Ibadan, and raised in Southern California. Biden had prior to his inauguration, nominated Adeyemo as part of the White House team that would drive Biden's vision of rebuilding the country

Update
<>Adeyemo abruptly quit Treasury when Trump came in.
<>Ademeyo refused to handover documents chronicling his Treasury activities
<>he quit Treasury leaving $4.7 trillion in unidentified Treasury payments.
<>the Nigerian once headed Obama’s “Foundation” which made Obama “a billionaire.”
<>probably why Obama wont discuss his Foundation finances.

9 posted on 03/02/2025 10:34:43 PM PST by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: asinclair

Another selectively applied law? Where apparent democrap donors run scot free and those that do not donate to democrap coffers, even if non-political, are punished? This seems to be a running theme through just about any enforcement.


10 posted on 03/02/2025 10:37:05 PM PST by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Liz

ah, I see, democraps turning us into a 3rd world kleptocracy.


11 posted on 03/02/2025 10:38:49 PM PST by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mass55th

mass55th wrote:


Does this include the Biden requirement for banks to report to the IRS every transaction of $600?

I don’t think it does; I hope they get rid of that limit.

And it’s not banks that report it, it’s online money transfer companies like PayPal, venmo, etc.

For example, if someone sells on eBay or Facebook Marketplace and ships the goods, the transactions are tallied and then reported to the IRS when it reaches the limit.

It used to be “$20,000 -and- 200 transactions”.

Last year the limit was $5000 and any number of transactions, this year it’s $2500 and any number of transactions, and next year it’s $600 and any number of transactions.

So someone selling their used sofa for $600 via PayPal will get a 1099-R form from PayPal and PayPal reports it to the IRS.

The tax preparers say if you sell it for less than you bought it for, you can put “$600, purchase” on a particular IRS form, and “$600 sold” on that form; this way it balances out and there’s no gain (you can’t take a loss on selling your goods).

But that will create a whole lot of paperwork, not to mention the mess when someone can’t prove what they initially paid for the item and the IRS asks for that proof (who keeps receipts beyond the warranty period for all their household goods?).


12 posted on 03/02/2025 10:50:03 PM PST by WildHighlander57 ((the more you tighten your grip, the more star systems will slip through your fingers.) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator

The usual Dem MO


13 posted on 03/02/2025 11:05:22 PM PST by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: WildHighlander57

Thanks for the excellent explanation. I appreciate it. I hope they do get rid of it. I don’t sell any thing online, and haven’t had a PayPal account in many years.


14 posted on 03/02/2025 11:55:35 PM PST by mass55th (“Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway.” ― John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Since the law was authorized a President who, himself, was credibly accused of laundering money through his own family’s shell companies, it is/was a joke.


15 posted on 03/02/2025 11:58:59 PM PST by The Duke (Not without incident.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

woohoo!

I’ve been riding this out simply on principal. They already know everything about me.


16 posted on 03/03/2025 12:00:10 AM PST by Gene Eric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mass55th; WildHighlander57

yeah, it has nothing to do with 1099 ($600+) wage reporting.

BOI reporting was a gratuitous attempt to have the primary Corporate/LLC owners identify themselves once again to a federal enforcement agency.

FWIW, Corporate/LLC entity founders already have to report their personal info to the incorporating state. BOI was nothing more than Congress demanding the centralization of the private ownership details.


17 posted on 03/03/2025 12:13:13 AM PST by Gene Eric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Filing last year cost me $500 in lawyer fees to file the convoluted form.

Will I get that back? (Rhetoric question)


18 posted on 03/03/2025 12:56:09 AM PST by llevrok (Keep buggering on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Trump’s Treasury Dept announced March 2 that it will no longer enforce the Corporate Transparency Act or the associated Beneficial Ownership Information reporting requirements.

“This is a victory for common sense,” said U.S. Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent. “Not only will we not enforce any penalties or fines associated with the beneficial ownership information reporting, but we will not enforce penalties or fines against U.S. citizens or domestic reporting companies or their beneficial owners.” Treasury said it will be narrowing the scope of the rule’s enforcement to foreign reporting companies only.


Backstory The Corporate Transparency Act was signed into law in January 2021, by Biden, to lull the taxpayers into thinking he was doing something about “money laundering” which is the favored practice of Congress and the Biden Crime Family.

Biden’s Corporate Transparency Act exempted many entities,
including banks, credit unions, and “governmental authorities.”


19 posted on 03/03/2025 1:02:33 AM PST by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: asinclair

We do need something like this in place for insurance companies, though. Apparently they create affiliate companies who charge them for “services” (they outsource a few tasks), and in wildly over charging, they siphon off the insurance company’s profits. That way the insurance company can raise rates, or declare themselves insolvent to avoid paying claims, and on paper they do indeed look broke, but only because their proceeds are being hidden in the affiliate company. It’s being noticed in Florida, but I’m sure it’s happening in a lot of other states as well.


20 posted on 03/03/2025 2:01:26 AM PST by A_perfect_lady (The greatest wealth is to live content with little. -Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson