Calif. Bill Would Ban Using Lethal Force to Defend Your Home. Now, its Author Is Rethinking His Proposal.

The San Joaquin Valley Sun ^ | February 25, 2025 | Daniel Gligich

[nickcarraway]

Ping

[blackdog]

Critical thinking tells me that the right of self defense of your person and your property being denied, kinda puts the police in a real conundrum. They can't respond to threats of their person or public property either.

One cannot have it both ways unless the state is approving Brownshirt Squads.

[clee1]

California is completely insane.

[Beowulf9]

California. Full Commie.

[Billthedrill]

The goal is to prevent wannabe vigilantes like Kyle Rittenhouse...

Still butt-hurt over losing the Rittenhouse thing, I see. Have to keep the Big Lie alive.

[DarrellZero]

Just when you think Democrats can’t get any stupider.

[ByteMercenary]

““AB 1333 was never intended to limit a crime victim’s right to defend yourself, your family, or home,” Zbur posted. “The goal is to prevent wannabe vigilantes like Kyle Rittenhouse from provoking violence & claiming self defense after the fact.”

Are all CA D politicians this nucking futz? Nothing about the Rittenhouse event was about defending property and Zbur totally mischaracterises it as provoked vigilantism.

Hopefully Zbur will soon have an event that changes his viewpoint - a painful event.

[monkeyshine]

Who came up with this stupid idea? Anyone who breaks into your home while you are in it is a defacto threat to your life. Shoot them. To make self defense illegal is anti-human and pro-violence. This guy is a complete moron. But it’s California…

[FamiliarFace]

It’s called The Land of Fruits and Nuts for a reason.

[Lazamataz]

Simply not good enough.

If someone enters your house with the intent to kill you, rape your wife, abduct your children, and steal your valuables, you should be required to:

Admit them into your house.
Give them chocolates.
Sit down with them and pay off any loans they have.
Hold your wife down while they rape her.
Hand over your car keys.
Help them load the car with your stuff.
Drop to your knees and give them fellatio.
Kill yourself.

Failure to do these things should be a California felony.

[Alas Babylon!]

Oh, big bad Kyle.

Yup, anytime we defend ourselves we're Kyle Rittenhouse, gunning for victims and cops enforcing the law are just George Floyd murderers.

California democrats are so bass ackwards!

[rktman]

Oh, the old run away run away scenario. Dumbasses!

[teeman8r]

i do not defend my home... i defend those that live there.

eat lead, mother uckers.

[Dr. Sivana]

The goal is to prevent wannabe vigilantes like Kyle Rittenhouse...

Rittenhouse wasn't at home, so he was not defending his home.

Rittenhouse was defending himself from physical harm and death, and was also collaterally defending the lives and health of others from violence. This bill has NOTHING to do with Rittenhouse, who was half-a-country away.

[hanamizu]

“....vigilantes like Kyle Rittenhouse from provoking violence & claiming self defense after the fact”

---

Kyle ‘provoked violence’ by simply being there. The late skateboard guy chased Kyle down and smashed him on the head before Kyle shot him. And the self-styled medic Kyle disarmed had a gun in his hand. The jury got it right, Assemblyman Zbur.

[gundog]

This guy is a complete moron.

Representative government....

[SaxxonWoods]

The bill would invite every criminal to show up with a gun and take whatever they want, including lives.

[gundog]

A former Executive Director of Equality California, the nation's largest statewide LGBTQ+ civil rights organization...

Climate justice, equity, blah, blah, blah. The guy’s a walking cliche.

[MtnClimber]

Post the addresses of all who supported this. They are volunteering to be victims.