They are cleaning house. People are being investigated to find reasons to terminate them. Some people do really stupid things. Obviously, there wasn’t much oversight of these people in the Bidet Regime.
To be clear, most of the bureaucracy has no granular oversight. I worked for the VA for over twenty years. We had weekly “worksheets” to report activities by checking boxes and writing in numbers of contacts etc. and I can tell you, it would be the easiest thing in the world to just mail it in. Some did almost no work but reported sufficient activities to protect their annual performance ratings, which were mostly pro forma “excellent.” Because nobody had incentive to do serious oversight— it just causes headaches with HR and the unions and EEO (now DEI, I suppose) etc.
Plenty of time to watch porn or play video games or text with people.
“Obviously, there wasn’t much oversight of these people in the Bidet Regime.”
There sure wasn’t. To me it’s even worse than that. They were actively encouraging it. I give you Sam Brinton and Richard Levine. Some here were skeptical of Tulsi Gabbard, but she acted swiftly and decisively. What has it been? A few days since this was exposed?
Careful. There are a few here complaining that these essential federal employees are being treated unfairly and need to keep their jobs.
I’m guessing ‘not much oversight’ was because the rot started at the top and moved down...
People are being investigated to find reasons to terminate them.
That’s like saying someone is being checked to see if they’re a shoplifter while they’re standing with a 30 pound turkey stuck inside their shirt.
I’d say they’re seeing the crimes and misconduct and responding appropriately.
To think that Gabbard was basically put on a terrorist no-fly list for being normal. Now it makes sense.