Well I gave you time and in classic fashion of a lying sophist your only point is she did not say “only.”
She literally said the vaccine was not designed to prevent infection which is one of the things the post stated she said.
Take you filthy obfuscations elsewhere, it is disgusting how hard you try to create false impression with half truths and omissions.
Your post was an attempt to discredit her interview by finding a small inaccurate detail and thereby dismiss everything, well I have pointed out you literally lied about her not saying what she said, therefore we must dismiss you out of hand as a spiteful propagandist.
Whaa, here is my quote:
///////////////////////////////////////////////
Mostly she said the elderly were at tremendous risk, and vax rollout was not done in correct sequence. The elderly should have gotten it first. Not “only”. First.
///////////////////////////////////////////////
The only word was the only one that mattered. How is it a lie? The article uses that word, “only”. She did not say this. And I think you know it.