Skip to comments.
Deadline For Trump’s Federal Buyout Offer Extended By Court—As Over 40,000 Staff Agree To Leave: Here’s What To Know
Forbes via MSN ^
| 02/06/2025
| Sara Dorn
Posted on 02/06/2025 11:09:06 AM PST by SeekAndFind
Topline
A federal judge temporarily blocked President Donald Trump’s buyout offer to federal civilian employees from taking effect Thursday, hours before the deadline the administration set for more than 2 million employees to decide whether to take resignation packages with pay through September. Timeline
Feb. 6: A federal judge in Massachusetts pushed back the deadline for employees to accept the offer, initially set for 11:59 p.m. Thursday, until at least Monday in response to a lawsuit filed by federal workers unions that argued the administration could not guarantee pay beyond March 14 expiration date for the existing budget. Feb. 5: About 40,000 of the approximately 2.3 million employees eligible for the buyout offer have accepted it, according to NBC News and The Washington Post—after a figure of around 20,000 was reported a day earlier.
Feb. 4: Trump is reportedly planning mass layoffs among those who don’t take the buyouts, CNN reported Tuesday, citing two unnamed administration officials.
Feb. 4: The CIA—which was exempt from the initial offer—extended the buyout option to all of its employees on Tuesday and will also implement a hiring freeze, the Wall Street Journal reported.
Jan. 28: The Office of Personnel Management announced in a memo posted to its website and in a mass email to federal employees that all full-time federal civilian staffers had the option of taking buyouts by Feb. 6 that would allow them to be paid, with benefits, through Sept. 30.
"The majority of federal agencies are likely to be downsized through restructurings, realignments, and reductions in force,” the email stated, warning that a significant number of federal employees would be furloughed or reclassified to “at-will,” making them easier to fire.
How Many Federal Workers Are Taking Buyouts?
More than 40,000 workers have reportedly taken the offer and the number is growing...
(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: buyout; buyouts; clintonjudge; deadline; dmassachusetts; doge; employees; federal; georgeaotoole; georgeaotoolejr; georgeotoole; georgeotoolejr; interference; judge; judicial; layoffs; politicaljudiciary; scram; seniorjudge; severance; unions; voicevote
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
To: SeekAndFind
The 40,000 workers represent roughly 2% of those who were offered the deal—a large job cut by any measure, but short of the White House’s reported goal of slashing between 5% and 10% of the federal workforce through buyouts.
Who Is Eligible For The Federal Buyouts? Which Employees Are Exempt From The Offer?
The vast majority of civilian staff are eligible for the buyouts. Military armed forces personnel, U.S. Postal Service employees, immigration enforcement and national security employees and workers related to public safety are exempt, according to an OPM fact sheet. Agency heads can also identify exemptions within their departments.
To: SeekAndFind
I curious did the Judge offer any reason for this judgement and present any evidence from the plaintiffs that the Executive Branch managing the work force of the Executive branch is some how suppose to be subject to the Judiciary arbitrary unlawful decisions?
Did the Judge explain how a Judge in MA has any standing to take this case since it involved the US Government and properly should be tired in the DC court?
3
posted on
02/06/2025 11:12:21 AM PST
by
MNJohnnie
(Don't blame me, my congressman is MTG!)
To: SeekAndFind
It’s not really a buy out. They are merely resigning with an end date way into the future.
The positions are already funded through the end of the fiscal year. So, there is no “bonus” attached.
To: SeekAndFind
The more the due process, the easier it is to stick it to the ones who don’t take the package.
5
posted on
02/06/2025 11:13:45 AM PST
by
rdcbn1
(TV )
To: MNJohnnie
They judge shopped which is also illegal.
6
posted on
02/06/2025 11:13:58 AM PST
by
Skwor
To: SeekAndFind
Every Feral Stooge in every court in America seems to be owned by the DemonRAT Party.
7
posted on
02/06/2025 11:14:02 AM PST
by
FlingWingFlyer
(Don't forget to celebrate "A Day Without Guac and Panther Pee" today! )
To: SeekAndFind
I’m OK with an extension as long as they don’t reverse the resignations already made.
8
posted on
02/06/2025 11:19:03 AM PST
by
bwest
To: Vermont Lt
What Trump has done is drop the required time of service and age to retire.
Normally it’s 30 years but this action drops it to 20 and the age requirement depends other factors but has also been decreased as well.
9
posted on
02/06/2025 11:20:06 AM PST
by
V_TWIN
(America...so great even the people that hate it refuse to leave!ly)
To: SeekAndFind
2% of the workforce taking the buyout in the first nine days?
It’s a good start. They’re the low-hanging fruit, like USAID.
10
posted on
02/06/2025 11:21:03 AM PST
by
AF_Blue
("America is all about speed. Hot, nasty, bad ass speed." - Eleanor Roosevelt, 1936)
To: SeekAndFind
I hope these rat partisans masquerading as judges are the next nails to meet the Trump hammer.
To: V_TWIN
What Trump has done is drop the required time of service and age to retire. I did not know that, I thought these were separations not retirements. I'm not happy about but it will still save money in the long run.
12
posted on
02/06/2025 11:24:29 AM PST
by
usurper
(AI was born with a birth defect.)
To: usurper
13
posted on
02/06/2025 11:31:23 AM PST
by
V_TWIN
(America...so great even the people that hate it refuse to leave!ly)
To: SeekAndFind
So 2 of Trumps most important EO are tossed just like 16
14
posted on
02/06/2025 11:32:02 AM PST
by
iamgalt
To: SeekAndFind
We are a kritarchy. (yes, I had to look it up)
15
posted on
02/06/2025 11:34:40 AM PST
by
mykroar
("It's Not the Nature of the Evidence; It's the Seriousness of the Charge." - El Rushbo)
To: SeekAndFind
Ignore the judge. No authority.
16
posted on
02/06/2025 11:41:04 AM PST
by
Fledermaus
(GOP RINOs - Get on Board or Get Out!)
To: V_TWIN
That’s not entirely accurate.
17
posted on
02/06/2025 11:44:42 AM PST
by
3RIVRS
To: SeekAndFind
This probably isn’t a bad result. More people will take the buyout.
18
posted on
02/06/2025 11:48:26 AM PST
by
Opinionated Blowhard
(When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.)
To: SeekAndFind
“Temporarily blocked”. What does this mean? Does it give Dems more time to find a favorable federal judge to stop it entirely (until SCOTUS slaps them down)?
19
posted on
02/06/2025 11:57:27 AM PST
by
jeffc
(Resident of the free State of Florida)
To: V_TWIN
I retired from the DoD in 2019.....this is a hell of a deal if you ask me. Its sure is. The private sector would never offer such terms.
20
posted on
02/06/2025 12:03:08 PM PST
by
usurper
(AI was born with a birth defect.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson