Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Danish king changes coat of arms amid row with Trump over Greenland Design shows intent to keep control of Faroe Islands and Greenland – which Trump says he would like the US to buy
guardian ^ | January 6, 2025 | Miranda Bryant

Posted on 02/04/2025 10:30:10 PM PST by xxqqzz

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last
Article shows pictures of old and new seals. Bigger polar bear and ram for Greenland and Faroa Islands. Got rid of three crowns from when Greenland ruled Norway and Sweden in the 16th century.
1 posted on 02/04/2025 10:30:10 PM PST by xxqqzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: xxqqzz

Sure, change your coat of arms.

Go for it.

What are you going to do, fire on us with arrows?


2 posted on 02/04/2025 10:35:30 PM PST by WeaslesRippedMyFlesh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xxqqzz
Thinking about Greenland: I keep wondering if the United States can afford to buy and maintain Greenland. We have enough money trouble already with the existing States and Territories -- is it a good idea to saddle ourselves with yet another money sink?

Ditto Panama Canal.

3 posted on 02/04/2025 10:36:03 PM PST by asinclair (It's too bad there will never be a RICO indictment of the DNC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xxqqzz

BTTT


4 posted on 02/04/2025 10:38:42 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WeaslesRippedMyFlesh
What are you going to do, fire on us with arrows?

Since some Freepers claim that Trump only wants to buy Greenland, arrows wouldn't be necessary. A simply "It's not for sale" should suffice to end the matter.

And Denmark has said "It's not for sale." Repeatedly.

5 posted on 02/04/2025 10:41:19 PM PST by Angelino97
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xxqqzz
"King", OMG, that is so precious! I suppose that is something akin to "The Burger King", bless his heart!



6 posted on 02/04/2025 10:42:53 PM PST by Governor Dinwiddie ( O give thanks unto the Lord, for He is gracious, and His mercy endureth forever. — Psalm 106)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xxqqzz
Ww have 750,000 people living in Alaska.

Denmark failed to develop and spend the resources they need to defend Greenland.

Only 55,000 people in Greenland.

My proposal is that Nuuk remains under Danish jurisdiction. But Greenland will be sold to USA.

Sort of like Hong Kong remained British for a long period of time.

7 posted on 02/04/2025 10:43:05 PM PST by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xxqqzz
I like the new Greenland coat of arms!

danish-crest-02
8 posted on 02/04/2025 10:53:26 PM PST by Right_Wing_Madman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: asinclair

I don’t think Trump really wanted to occupy Greenland or Panama Canal. But he saw that US interests in those places have been neglected by American government and especially Panama is playing fire by letting China take control of the canal. With Greenland, it is a strategic place closer to the US than to Denmark. He saw the possibility of Russia and China make a game for it. His goals are to prevent American interest in the two places diminished.

By making such statements, international focus went to both places and negotiation took place. At the end, he prevents other countries to control Panama Canal and Greenland, and American interests are maintained.


9 posted on 02/04/2025 10:59:05 PM PST by paudio (NEW MATH: 45=47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: paudio
By making such statements, international focus went to both places and negotiation took place. At the end, he prevents other countries to control Panama Canal and Greenland, and American interests are maintained.

Greenland is an excellent reason why we should withdraw from NATO. First of all, the Cold War ended in 1991.

And right now, Denmark is all about "saving the environment" so they're not going to develop Greenland.

Eventually, China or Russia will take Greenland from Denmark if we don't do it first.

10 posted on 02/04/2025 11:05:01 PM PST by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Angelino97

“A simply “It’s not for sale” should suffice to end the matter.”

Umm, in business negotiations a no is not always final. Trump would never have made his decades of dealings and business growth if he went by your statement.


11 posted on 02/04/2025 11:19:22 PM PST by b4me (Pray, and let God change you. He knows better than you or anyone else, who He made you to be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: xxqqzz

Sorta like titanic’s deck chairs


12 posted on 02/04/2025 11:21:02 PM PST by Palio di Siena (Kralik…..you get the wallet )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Another result of Trump’s ststement is the local Greenlanders intensity theie efforts to be independent from Denmark.

We will see this development. Maybe another job for USAID ... half j/k


13 posted on 02/04/2025 11:21:55 PM PST by paudio (NEW MATH: 45=47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: xxqqzz

14 posted on 02/04/2025 11:25:15 PM PST by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me https://youtu.be/wH-pk2vZG2M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xxqqzz

i heard they doubled their number of dog sleds for national defense


15 posted on 02/04/2025 11:31:19 PM PST by joshua c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Governor Dinwiddie

Your British ancestors were subjects of a Danish king (or a few of them). At one time.

Cnut (Canute) for one.


16 posted on 02/05/2025 12:00:52 AM PST by buwaya (Strategic imperatives )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: WeaslesRippedMyFlesh

Lawyers are the modern weapon system. They CAN make it difficult.

BTW the Danish national weapon is the Madsen LMG, a very interesting device, if rather obsolete. Look it up.


17 posted on 02/05/2025 12:04:27 AM PST by buwaya (Strategic imperatives )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: buwaya
Gosh, you're right! I completely forgot about the Danelaw


18 posted on 02/05/2025 12:17:18 AM PST by Governor Dinwiddie ( O give thanks unto the Lord, for He is gracious, and His mercy endureth forever. — Psalm 106)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: asinclair

Opus?

Denmark can more afford to maintain Greenland than us?

The resumption of the Monroe Doctrine is no priority? Keeping Red China out of the Panama Canal is not part of that?


19 posted on 02/05/2025 12:23:35 AM PST by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Angelino97

Back to “Make Europe Great Again”, I see.


20 posted on 02/05/2025 12:24:25 AM PST by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson